British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   Select a Candidate for 2008 (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/select-candidate-2008-a-482909/)

elfman Sep 22nd 2007 2:34 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by BigDavyG (Post 5342990)
Won't divulge my results as the quiz is obviously fatally flawed :blink:...

was it Hillary? :rofl:

cindyabs Sep 22nd 2007 2:50 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
I tied Guiliani and Biden :blink:

John Edwards was third.


:huh:

Lord Lionheart Sep 22nd 2007 2:56 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by cindyabs (Post 5343333)
I tied Guiliani and Biden :blink:

John Edwards was third.


:huh:

I heard a segment on Friday on NPR about Guiliani, a former staunch advocate of gun control while mayor of NYC, he was giving a speech to the NRA about 2nd amendment rights.
These guys have no shame......... or principles that can't be bought for the right price.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=14596793

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=14620495

happynz Sep 22nd 2007 3:09 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
Kucinich and Richardson at 49
Clinton and Obama at 46
Mike Gravel at 45

:o erm...I know Dennis Kucinich and Bill Richardson don't stand a chance at getting the Democratic nomination.

anotherlimey Sep 22nd 2007 6:40 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
Edwards
Clinton
Obama

:confused:

snowbunny Sep 22nd 2007 7:02 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
Kucinich
Dodd
Gravel

biofuels -- we should definitely expand research, but production? As Kathy pointed out, they currently aren't petroleum saving. They will drive up the cost of livestock feed and other products, so they aren't a panacea, but they are a starting point.

more like require everyone to drive a 30 mpg+ vehicle.... ahem....

immigration -- enforce the existing laws and send employers to jail. Hmmm, that wasn't an option. This is a major hot button for me, but not because I blame the immigrants, I blame those who've exploited them.

cindyabs Sep 22nd 2007 11:25 pm

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by happynz (Post 5343345)
Kucinich and Richardson at 49
Clinton and Obama at 46
Mike Gravel at 45

:o erm...I know Dennis Kucinich and Bill Richardson don't stand a chance at getting the Democratic nomination.

Jeez,my TOP results were only 26 point match. I consider myself a moderate and an Independant.

This does not bode well for me in 2008. :unsure:

Roland Hulme Sep 23rd 2007 12:09 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by BigDavyG (Post 5342990)
Won't divulge my results as the quiz is obviously fatally flawed :blink:
But it was interesting that my response to the following question was contrary to the stance of several candidates - should anyone who is against this policy be allowed to live, let alone stand for election...

Hang on Big Davy G - I think we ALL agree we need to sort out the oil crisis, but America's not going about the biofuel business the right way. Corn - which is the basis of their research - is fatally flawed because it has a one-to-one conversion ratio (uses as much energy to make it as it gives out) and you'd need to convert four Americas into corn fields to produce enough to fuel america.

Sugar based biofuel is likely - so lets pour our gas money into the carribbean instead of the middle east and finally let them get rich off something other than tourism.

So being against federally funded biofuel ISN'T a bad thing - it doesn't mean you're against biofuel entirely - just the cackhanded US version of it.

Pharrya Sep 23rd 2007 2:29 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
I got Joe Biden, beating a joint second of Hillary!, Obama and John Edwards.

Although I don't particularly like Biden as a person (or his public persona, never actually met him)

This will be the first US election where I can vote, having got citizenship 2 months ago. Oh, and I'm registerd as Unaffiliated.

Lord Lionheart Sep 23rd 2007 2:50 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by cindyabs (Post 5344126)
Jeez,my TOP results were only 26 point match. I consider myself a moderate and an Independant.

This does not bode well for me in 2008. :unsure:

I was thinking the same thing about people that got scores in the 40's and 50's. My top few candidates were only 3 our 4 points difference, and my top 2 guys got 29 points each. One of the Republicans even got 17 points :unsure:


Originally Posted by Pharrya (Post 5344695)

This will be the first US election where I can vote, having got citizenship 2 months ago. Oh, and I'm registerd as Unaffiliated.

Congratulations. I just got mine a week ago. I registered unaffiliated too

BigDavyG Sep 23rd 2007 3:12 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by Roland Hulme (Post 5344251)
So being against federally funded biofuel ISN'T a bad thing - it doesn't mean you're against biofuel entirely - just the cackhanded US version of it.

Well my take was that anything that begins to take the US down that path can only be a good thing, despite the many potential short-term inefficiencies and issues.

BritGuyTN Sep 23rd 2007 4:32 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 
well i got hilary and obama tied with 45

apparently I disagree with them on taxes and iraq

why can't we have a nice candidate who wants to cut taxes and leave Iraq asap?

Sally Sep 23rd 2007 4:37 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by BritGuyTN (Post 5344939)
well i got hilary and obama tied with 45

apparently I disagree with them on taxes and iraq

why can't we have a nice candidate who wants to cut taxes and leave Iraq asap?

It's use of the taxes they do get really.

NC Penguin Sep 23rd 2007 8:54 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by fatbrit (Post 5343187)
Excellent news!

... but it doesn't mean the test taker's going to vote according to the results.:)

snowbunny Sep 23rd 2007 11:19 am

Re: Select a Candidate for 2008
 

Originally Posted by Lord Lionheart (Post 5344738)
I was thinking the same thing about people that got scores in the 40's and 50's. My top few candidates were only 3 our 4 points difference, and my top 2 guys got 29 points each. One of the Republicans even got 17 points :unsure:

Kucinich at my top got 64 points; Dodd 62; Gravel 59. I'll bet the difference is "how strongly" you feel about each issue; I tend to feel fairly strongly and indicated that.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:48 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.