|
Restrictions on travel
https://oag.ca.gov/ab1887
My son brought this to my attention. He's planning how to spend his conference attendance funds for 2017, and this puts a severe crimp in his choice of venues ... |
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12144010)
https://oag.ca.gov/ab1887
My son brought this to my attention. He's planning how to spend his conference attendance funds for 2017, and this puts a severe crimp in his choice of venues ... |
Re: Restrictions on travel
They have become a caricature of the liberal lefty
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
California is at the bottom of my list of states I'd consider moving to.
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12144010)
https://oag.ca.gov/ab1887
My son brought this to my attention. He's planning how to spend his conference attendance funds for 2017, and this puts a severe crimp in his choice of venues ... |
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12144010)
https://oag.ca.gov/ab1887
My son brought this to my attention. He's planning how to spend his conference attendance funds for 2017, and this puts a severe crimp in his choice of venues ...
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 12144292)
He was seriously considering Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee? Is he part of California's state department for country and blues music, or corn production?
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12144321)
Or moonshine production? :lol:
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 12144326)
He's still got Virginia and South Carolina open to him if that's the plan. ....
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12144345)
There ain't much goin' on in SC that is either educational or cultural. :rolleyes:
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Maybe this is the first step to succession or to kill the economies in those states.
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by mrken30
(Post 12144392)
Maybe this is the first step to succession or to kill the economies in those states.
This is just a restriction on state-sponsored travel though. There are still 49 other states who don't have these restrictions, it won't really have much of an effect in the long run. |
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 12144394)
* Secession :p
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_of_states
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 12144394)
This is just a restriction on state-sponsored travel though. There are still 49 other states who don't have these restrictions, it won't really have much of an effect in the long run.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0a506064d9a26 |
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by mrken30
(Post 12144392)
Maybe this is the first step to succession .....
|
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12144399)
The last time I heard (last November), it was some Californians who were exploring secession. :lol:
The South can keep their country singers. Unfortunately some of the good LGBT singers are dead now |
Re: Restrictions on travel
Originally Posted by mrken30
(Post 12144392)
Maybe this is the first step to succession or to kill the economies in those states.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 7:52 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.