![]() |
The Queen
We just watched Her Majesty on TV. She rules. Literaly.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by chartreuse
(Post 7098594)
We just watched Her Majesty on TV. She rules. Literaly.
My God ! .... Is she still alive ? |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Patrick Hasler
(Post 7098627)
My God ! .... Is she still alive ?
|
Re: The Queen
I just watched it on YouTube. I had to replay the song at the end several times before I figured out that it was "O Little Town of Bethlehem." Turns out you Brits use a different melody than we do here in the States. Interesting...
~ Jenney |
Re: The Queen
"The Queen"... is boring... :sneaky:
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by DeanUK2US
(Post 7098662)
"The Queen"... is boring... :sneaky:
Plus I can't stand the woman or any of them come to that, we certainly won't be watching or listening to her in this household. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by chartreuse
(Post 7098643)
I reckon she could still kick your scrawny ass ;)
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Poppy girl
(Post 7098670)
I am with you there Dean BORING..
Plus I can't stand the woman or any of them come to that, we certainly won't be watching or listening to her in this household. I switched off as soon as I heard her voice, and I can't even remember what was said! :D |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by chartreuse
(Post 7098594)
We just watched Her Majesty on TV. She rules. Literaly.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Patrick Hasler
(Post 7098679)
She probably could... after she kicked yous :D
Merry Christmas - nearly time for Doctor Who now...:D |
Re: The Queen
Well if you dont like the Queen there is always the alternative christmas message on channel 4 this year by the Iranian president.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7799652.stm Cant see that occuring in the US! |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by chartreuse
(Post 7098594)
We just watched Her Majesty on TV. She rules. Literaly.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by tonrob
(Post 7099054)
Slapper.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Patrick Hasler
(Post 7098627)
My God ! .... Is she still alive ?
|
Re: The Queen
I just watched it, I thought it was a rather nice one. :thumbup:
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Poppy girl
(Post 7099056)
LMAO doesn't look like she has many fans on BE :lol:
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Poppy girl
(Post 7099056)
LMAO doesn't look like she has many fans on BE :lol:
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by britvic
(Post 7099119)
It's not who she is it's what she stands for and she ain't done too bad a job :) and I'm not making excuses's for most of that blood line.
|
Re: The Queen
I'd rather have the Queen as Head of State than Brown, Blair Thatcher, Cameron or any other of those conniving, lying, self serving ***** known as politicians.
Anyhoo, I'm off to watch the dr Who christmas special, when I can get Mrs T away from Eastenders anyway :D |
Re: The Queen
I downloaded it and will be watching with Christmas dinner, not because I think she will have anything life changing to say but out of English tradition.
Although it would be funnier if the D of E did it, he comes out with some corkers :lol: |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Titchski
(Post 7099209)
I'd rather have the Queen as Head of State than Brown, Blair Thatcher, Cameron or any other of those conniving, lying, self serving ***** known as politicians.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by AdobePinon
(Post 7099268)
Why? What would be different?
|
Re: The Queen
What could she possibly have to say that has any relevance to anyone? As long as she brings in the tourist dollars I'm not against her staying in her role, but that's the one and only purpose she serves. She can kiss my ass otherwise. Lady Di was the only one I had any respect for and they knocked her off ...
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7099352)
As long as she brings in the tourist dollars...
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Manc
(Post 7099386)
of course Paris gets no tourists since the French Revolution.
|
Re: The Queen
I find your comments concerning our head of state quite offensive.:frown:
You may not like her offspring but she has kept a certain stability to our home country for a considerable length of time.She may have, in some eyes,become outdated,but what 'she' represents is tradition and history. Both of which bring much needed revenue to the country.She also brings some hope to some people that there is a buffer to the irresponsible Government's we have had.:frown: |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7099401)
But Paris is pretty and has good food!
Jim. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Scouse Express
(Post 7100794)
Are you talking about Paris Hilton?
Jim. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Dogbyte
(Post 7100788)
I find your comments concerning our head of state quite offensive.:frown:
You may not like her offspring but she has kept a certain stability to our home country for a considerable length of time.She may have, in some eyes,become outdated,but what 'she' represents is tradition and history. Both of which bring much needed revenue to the country.She also brings some hope to some people that there is a buffer to the irresponsible Government's we have had.:frown: |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Dogbyte
(Post 7100788)
I find your comments concerning our head of state quite offensive.:frown:
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Dogbyte
(Post 7100788)
She may have, in some eyes,become outdated,but what 'she' represents is tradition and history. Both of which bring much needed revenue to the country.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Dogbyte
(Post 7100788)
I find your comments concerning our head of state quite offensive.:frown:
You may not like her offspring but she has kept a certain stability to our home country for a considerable length of time.She may have, in some eyes,become outdated,but what 'she' represents is tradition and history. Both of which bring much needed revenue to the country.She also brings some hope to some people that there is a buffer to the irresponsible Government's we have had.:frown: As for being a 'buffer', though - let's be realistic - if she tried to interfere in the workings of the government, she'd simply be legislated out of the process. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Manc
(Post 7100813)
I find a non elected head of state and self professed head of a church to be highly offensive.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7101185)
US has Disneyland, UK has the Royal Family. Whatever works.
We're screwed! :rofl: |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by ironporer
(Post 7099065)
Nah, they just hired the ex Soviet Stalin embalmers, and a couple of Disney animatrinix experts to make it see so,
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7101185)
Like I said, as long as she's a tourist attraction, she's ok with me! US has Disneyland, UK has the Royal Family. Whatever works.
========================== "The argument that the monarchy brings in tourism revenue is not only irrelevant to a debate about our constitution, it is also untrue. There is not a single bit of evidence to back this up. Of the top 20 tourist attractions in the UK only one royal residence makes it, Windsor Castle at number 17 (beaten comfortably by Windsor Legoland, in at number 7). Royal residences account for less than 1% of total tourist revenue. Indeed, the success of the Tower of London (number 6 in the list) suggests that tourism would benefit if Buckingham Palace and Windsor castle were vacated by the Windsor family. The British tourist industry is successful and robust - castles and palaces would remain a part of our heritage regardless of whether or not we have a monarchy (look at Versaille). Other attractions, such as the London Eye, Trafalgar Square, the west end, Bath, Stonehenge, Britain's beautiful countryside and so on, will continue to attract tourists in the same numbers as they do today." ========================== From http://www.republic.org.uk/ Yes, you can quibble about the source being biased if you want. I won't argue with you. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by tonrob
(Post 7099054)
Slapper.
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by nettlebed
(Post 7102196)
But the value of the tourism that the Royal Family brings to the country is nothing compared to the amount of money that could be brought in if all the royal residences and establishments were open to tourists all year round.
========================== "The argument that the monarchy brings in tourism revenue is not only irrelevant to a debate about our constitution, it is also untrue. There is not a single bit of evidence to back this up. Of the top 20 tourist attractions in the UK only one royal residence makes it, Windsor Castle at number 17 (beaten comfortably by Windsor Legoland, in at number 7). Royal residences account for less than 1% of total tourist revenue. Indeed, the success of the Tower of London (number 6 in the list) suggests that tourism would benefit if Buckingham Palace and Windsor castle were vacated by the Windsor family. The British tourist industry is successful and robust - castles and palaces would remain a part of our heritage regardless of whether or not we have a monarchy (look at Versaille). Other attractions, such as the London Eye, Trafalgar Square, the west end, Bath, Stonehenge, Britain's beautiful countryside and so on, will continue to attract tourists in the same numbers as they do today." ========================== From http://www.republic.org.uk/ Yes, you can quibble about the source being biased if you want. I won't argue with you. |
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7103526)
Cool, I won't argue with that! So kick 'em out then, because they don't deserve to live there for any other reason!
|
Re: The Queen
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 7103526)
Cool, I won't argue with that! So kick 'em out then, because they don't deserve to live there for any other reason!
--- |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:13 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.