Planespotting II

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 13th 2020, 9:17 pm
  #931  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Pulaski
"Suspected"
It is a Seattle based new outlet
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 11:03 am
  #932  
BE Forum Addict
 
markonline1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 2,554
markonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond reputemarkonline1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Wow! British Airways announced last night it was retiring it’s fleet of B747’s immediately!! Obviously we knew it was coming, it was planned for 2024, but that’s it. They won’t be flying any more. I think I’m right in saying BA were the biggest operator still of the type. Sad day. The 380 was a bigger aircraft, but when I used to follow a 747 down a taxiway is it taxied out with its flaps out, I used to be amazed every time how the hell it got off the ground. It was massive. A beautiful and iconic aircraft.
markonline1 is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 11:13 am
  #933  
Often not so civil...
 
civilservant's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: The Boonies, GA
Posts: 9,561
civilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

I'm not surprised. The 4-burners were always going to be done for the second that demand dropped off a cliff. I'm surprised they survived the Great Recession to be honest. I was never a fan myself, either flying on them or their looks, but it is another type consigned to history for BA, which is always sad.

They did look good in the Landor livery, but then, so did everything.

Concorde in Landor


Last edited by civilservant; Jul 17th 2020 at 11:24 am. Reason: 'fan'
civilservant is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 2:00 pm
  #934  
Thread Starter
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,448
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by markonline1
Wow! British Airways announced last night it was retiring it’s fleet of B747’s immediately!! ....
Isn't that announcement actually back-dated by three months? I can't image that BA has been flying many 747s since the end of March.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:07 pm
  #935  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Steerpike's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13,111
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by civilservant
I'm not surprised. The 4-burners were always going to be done for the second that demand dropped off a cliff. I'm surprised they survived the Great Recession to be honest. I was never a fan myself, either flying on them or their looks, but it is another type consigned to history for BA, which is always sad.

They did look good in the Landor livery, but then, so did everything.

Concorde in Landor

4-burners - 4 engines? I've always felt safer on a 4-engine plane, from a redundancy perspective.
Steerpike is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:12 pm
  #936  
Often not so civil...
 
civilservant's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: The Boonies, GA
Posts: 9,561
civilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Steerpike
4-burners - 4 engines? I've always felt safer on a 4-engine plane, from a redundancy perspective.
Right.

I see the logic of the 'more is more' but honestly since the advent of ETOPS they just aren't relevant anymore. These engines hardly ever fail, and if they do it's some outside force (like the pilot turning it off by mistake, ice build up, bird ingestion etc)
civilservant is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:13 pm
  #937  
Thread Starter
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,448
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Steerpike
4-burners - 4 engines? I've always felt safer on a 4-engine plane, from a redundancy perspective.
That post, under the quoted picture, seems ironic, considering the fate of Concorde.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:14 pm
  #938  
Often not so civil...
 
civilservant's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: The Boonies, GA
Posts: 9,561
civilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Pulaski
That post seems ironic, considering the fate of Concorde.
Not the Olympus's fault though was it? Blame the DC-10 that departed in front of it
civilservant is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:15 pm
  #939  
Thread Starter
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,448
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by civilservant
Not the Olympus's fault though was it? Blame the DC-10 that departed in front of it. ....
Agreed.

Anyway, to Steerpike's point, there aren't many two engine planes that come down because of engine issues. Software issues, pilot errors/ issues, .... and, er, missiles, appear to be the most common reasons these days for planes to drop out of the sky, and having an extra couple of engines isn't going to help with any of those issues.

Last edited by Pulaski; Jul 17th 2020 at 5:19 pm.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 5:57 pm
  #940  
BE Forum Addict
 
steveq's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: State College Pa.
Posts: 1,585
steveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by civilservant
I see the logic of the 'more is more' but honestly since the advent of ETOPS they just aren't relevant anymore.
For those not familiar with air flight acronyms. ETOPS. Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim.
steveq is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 6:58 pm
  #941  
Often not so civil...
 
civilservant's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: The Boonies, GA
Posts: 9,561
civilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond reputecivilservant has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards

I've heard yours before though, and like it very much
civilservant is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 7:03 pm
  #942  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Agreed.

Anyway, to Steerpike's point, there aren't many two engine planes that come down because of engine issues. Software issues, pilot errors/ issues, .... and, er, missiles, appear to be the most common reasons these days for planes to drop out of the sky, and having an extra couple of engines isn't going to help with any of those issues.
Leaving aside the MH370 disappearance, the last major over-the-ocean crash I can remember was AF447 over the southern Atlantic. That was caused by frozen pitot tubes and pilot error, so four engines wouldn't have saved it.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 7:30 pm
  #943  
BE Forum Addict
 
steveq's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: State College Pa.
Posts: 1,585
steveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond reputesteveq has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
That was caused by frozen pitot tubes and pilot error, so four engines wouldn't have saved it.
True, I wouldn't even blame the tubes, it was pilot error. The final accident report was very sobering.
steveq is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 7:42 pm
  #944  
Thread Starter
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,448
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Originally Posted by steveq
True, I wouldn't even blame the tubes, it was pilot error. The final accident report was very sobering.
I believe there are similarities with Atlas Air 3591 which was apparently flown into the ground by a pilot who trusted his perceptions over the readings on his instruments.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Jul 17th 2020, 7:44 pm
  #945  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Planespotting II

Ill miss seeing the 747. I loved the look. Glad I got to fly on it once. We would get a BA 747 half the year here in Vancouver and A380 in summer peak season.


Still need a 777 myself but likely never will fly on one.

Not much variety in my new city, mostly Dash 8s and smaller.

scrubbedexpat091 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.