OT: Demenezes shooting
#16
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Pity the same isn't true when the US military or private security services do it :curse:
#17
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: HMP Strangeways
Posts: 5,206
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
You say the end justified the means, by killing one they saved who knows how many? What if that had been your brother or father or son? Wouldn't you demand justice for their senseless death? I know this may sound a bit melodramatic, but how many innocents could die if we don't have repercussions in place to protect us and we allow the Police full force of arms to shoot anyone who looks/acts suspicious?
I ask why the officers had to "shoot to kill" instead of 'shoot to disarm"? They could have shot him anywhere, like the hand, arm, knee, leg, etc to bring him down, but they chose a fatal shot. Besides if he had indeed been an operative, wouldn't be somewhat beneficial to have a live terrorist (for questioning) rather than a dead one?
Have to concur with Leslie - it's still an uproar in the US when an innocent person is killed by officers just as it should be.
I ask why the officers had to "shoot to kill" instead of 'shoot to disarm"? They could have shot him anywhere, like the hand, arm, knee, leg, etc to bring him down, but they chose a fatal shot. Besides if he had indeed been an operative, wouldn't be somewhat beneficial to have a live terrorist (for questioning) rather than a dead one?
Have to concur with Leslie - it's still an uproar in the US when an innocent person is killed by officers just as it should be.
You say shoot him in the leg.That happens in the movies not in real life (I speak from experience)This is not to sound flippant over the matter, but you have to remember that the British Police are still learning by the faults as carrying firearms was not until recent years, a normal practice. I regret any loss of life but the circumstances warranted a regrettable death of in this case an innocent person.On not too a lighter note though, if De Mendes had not been an illegal alien, he would have been back in Brazil !.
#18
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Leslie, the answer to this question is simple.Surviellence officers follow him but no armed response officers close enough to stop him.Lack of info re radios,armed officers acted on info given.believed armed with device.... objective... to deny him chance to detonate. determination ..kill him. Simple.
#20
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: HMP Strangeways
Posts: 5,206
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Correct, one of them that eventually got to the station was, but that was part of the confusion that reigned over the whole situation.The surveillance officers gave way to the armed response officers who immediately went to the platform,onto the train and killed him.An unarmed surveillance officer was actually holding his arms on the train to stop him detonating a believed device.When the armed officers saw that they assumed he was trying to detonate a bomb, so they neutralized him', as they say.The actual surveillance officer was nearly shot in the chest aswell due to his action at it was only because he screamed he was 'Police' he didnt get done aswell.
#21
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
I ask why the officers had to "shoot to kill" instead of 'shoot to disarm"? They could have shot him anywhere, like the hand, arm, knee, leg, etc to bring him down, but they chose a fatal shot.
A tragic mistake everyone would agree, but that's that.
#23
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Ok Thanks. What is everyone on here a doctor now?
#26
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Me????? 14 years in the St John Ambulance Brigade, from age 11 upwards.
Invaluable First Aid Training
Free Touchline Seats For Liverpool & Everton (and Directors Box)
Free Concert Admission For The Liverpool Empire
Free Spot At Beechers Brook for The Grand National
etc etc.
What a life
Jim.
Invaluable First Aid Training
Free Touchline Seats For Liverpool & Everton (and Directors Box)
Free Concert Admission For The Liverpool Empire
Free Spot At Beechers Brook for The Grand National
etc etc.
What a life
Jim.
Last edited by Scouse Express; Oct 17th 2007 at 1:29 am.
#27
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
Probably shock ... I'm a doctor ..but not of medicine
But I have seen it happen
http://www.policeone.com/officer-down/634288/
But I have seen it happen
http://www.policeone.com/officer-down/634288/
#28
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
You have to look at the complete picture as known at that time of the incidents faced by both the Police and Government.Terrorists believed still active and believed capable of continued violence against the general public.I concur that the higharchy of both Police and Government should have been quicker to acknowledge that a mistake had been made and by making certain comments too soon placed an unjustified amount of pressure on officers who risked their own lives in that station.If he had been a bomber they would have been killed aswell.A policy was in place which had been tried and tested and that is a dead terrorist does not explode bombs.
You say shoot him in the leg.That happens in the movies not in real life (I speak from experience)This is not to sound flippant over the matter, but you have to remember that the British Police are still learning by the faults as carrying firearms was not until recent years, a normal practice. I regret any loss of life but the circumstances warranted a regrettable death of in this case an innocent person.On not too a lighter note though, if De Mendes had not been an illegal alien, he would have been back in Brazil !.
You say shoot him in the leg.That happens in the movies not in real life (I speak from experience)This is not to sound flippant over the matter, but you have to remember that the British Police are still learning by the faults as carrying firearms was not until recent years, a normal practice. I regret any loss of life but the circumstances warranted a regrettable death of in this case an innocent person.On not too a lighter note though, if De Mendes had not been an illegal alien, he would have been back in Brazil !.
#30
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: OT: Demenezes shooting
I ask why the officers had to "shoot to kill" instead of 'shoot to disarm"? They could have shot him anywhere, like the hand, arm, knee, leg, etc to bring him down, but they chose a fatal shot. Besides if he had indeed been an operative, wouldn't be somewhat beneficial to have a live terrorist (for questioning) rather than a dead one?
You confront a would be suicide bomber with a detonator in his hand, and you shoot him in the leg/arm. Don't you think he might just get pissed off? Bear in mind you're going to have to be pretty close to do it with a pistol, close enough that his explosive belt is going to give you a new type of face lift.
Not the best idea.
The problem here was that the victim was wrongly identified as a potential suicide bomber. The guys who pulled the trigger were not at fault (as I believe has been established at the hearing already), they shot to stop a perceived threat.