non vs. none
#1
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Boston / Guipúzcoa
Posts: 718
non vs. none
A question for you Brits out there (I'm American):
In the US, we would say, for example, "non resident". But I've seen some Brits use "none resident". Is that a UK thing?
Thanks.
- Eric S.
In the US, we would say, for example, "non resident". But I've seen some Brits use "none resident". Is that a UK thing?
Thanks.
- Eric S.
#2
Re: non vs. none
No. Likely just a spelling error or simple slip of the fingers
Non is a prefix
None is a pronoun.
Non is a prefix
None is a pronoun.
#3
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Boston / Guipúzcoa
Posts: 718
Re: non vs. none
Well, that's what I first thought. But then I kept seeing it in other places.
- Eric S.
- Eric S.
#5
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,545
Re: non vs. none
It could also be that, in some circumstances, autocomplete doesn't like the look of "non" as a word so amends it to "none." Personally, I've got into the habit of eyeballing my text to try to ensure that stupid misspellings haven't been introduced by the machine, but it's easy to miss some.
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
#6
Re: non vs. none
It could also be that, in some circumstances, autocomplete doesn't like the look of "non" as a word so amends it to "none." Personally, I've got into the habit of eyeballing my text to try to ensure that stupid misspellings haven't been introduced by the machine, but it's easy to miss some.
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
However, there are certainly problems with you're/your, they're/their/there, it's/its, lose/loose, etc.
Last edited by macliam; Jan 2nd 2019 at 8:32 pm.
#7
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,545
#9
Re: non vs. none
I've noticed an increasing rate of typos on online news sources..Telegraph, Guardian etc...severe lack of editor oversight these days.
And reading The Scotsman, Glasgow Herald headlines...they just seem so parochial now which makes me wary of moving back.
Last week the Herald had a headline, '1 in 3 Scots, a clear majority..blah, blah...' also in another article the writer used 'to' instead of 'too', repeatedly.
I gave them a good tutting...
And reading The Scotsman, Glasgow Herald headlines...they just seem so parochial now which makes me wary of moving back.
Last week the Herald had a headline, '1 in 3 Scots, a clear majority..blah, blah...' also in another article the writer used 'to' instead of 'too', repeatedly.
I gave them a good tutting...
Last edited by Hotscot; Jan 2nd 2019 at 9:25 pm.
#13
Re: non vs. none
I've noticed an increasing rate of typos on online news sources..Telegraph, Guardian etc...severe lack of editor oversight these days.