non vs. none
#1
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 726
From: Boston / Guipúzcoa











A question for you Brits out there (I'm American):
In the US, we would say, for example, "non resident". But I've seen some Brits use "none resident". Is that a UK thing?
Thanks.
- Eric S.
In the US, we would say, for example, "non resident". But I've seen some Brits use "none resident". Is that a UK thing?
Thanks.
- Eric S.
#2
No. Likely just a spelling error or simple slip of the fingers
Non is a prefix
None is a pronoun.
Non is a prefix
None is a pronoun.
#3
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 726
From: Boston / Guipúzcoa











Well, that's what I first thought. But then I kept seeing it in other places.
- Eric S.
- Eric S.
#5
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,508
From: North Norfolk and northern New York State











It could also be that, in some circumstances, autocomplete doesn't like the look of "non" as a word so amends it to "none." Personally, I've got into the habit of eyeballing my text to try to ensure that stupid misspellings haven't been introduced by the machine, but it's easy to miss some.
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
#6
It could also be that, in some circumstances, autocomplete doesn't like the look of "non" as a word so amends it to "none." Personally, I've got into the habit of eyeballing my text to try to ensure that stupid misspellings haven't been introduced by the machine, but it's easy to miss some.
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
Talking of young illiterate people, one I see sometimes is when people write "tonne" when they mean "ton."
However, there are certainly problems with you're/your, they're/their/there, it's/its, lose/loose, etc.
Last edited by macliam; Jan 2nd 2019 at 8:32 am.
#7
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,508
From: North Norfolk and northern New York State











#9
I've noticed an increasing rate of typos on online news sources..Telegraph, Guardian etc...severe lack of editor oversight these days.
And reading The Scotsman, Glasgow Herald headlines...they just seem so parochial now which makes me wary of moving back.
Last week the Herald had a headline, '1 in 3 Scots, a clear majority..blah, blah...' also in another article the writer used 'to' instead of 'too', repeatedly.
I gave them a good tutting...
And reading The Scotsman, Glasgow Herald headlines...they just seem so parochial now which makes me wary of moving back.
Last week the Herald had a headline, '1 in 3 Scots, a clear majority..blah, blah...' also in another article the writer used 'to' instead of 'too', repeatedly.
I gave them a good tutting...
Last edited by Hotscot; Jan 2nd 2019 at 9:25 am.
#13
I've noticed an increasing rate of typos on online news sources..Telegraph, Guardian etc...severe lack of editor oversight these days.




