![]() |
Re: A language question
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve." That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter. What happened to "first come, first served"? :frown: |
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 9582458)
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve." That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter. What happened to "first come, first served"? :frown: |
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Egg and Cress
(Post 9583232)
Maybe what is meant is "if you are the first to come, you are the first one we serve" ?? :unsure::)
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 9582458)
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve." That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter. What happened to "first come, first served"? :frown: |
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by nethead
(Post 9583270)
My kids have a habit of saying something happened 'on' accident instead of 'by' accident which doesn't sound right to me. I thought it was just them and some type of kid talk then I heard an adult the other day say it, so don't know whether it's an American thing or a regional thing??
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by another bloody yank
(Post 9583284)
I've heard of doing something "on purpose". Maybe it's related.
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 9582458)
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve." That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter. What happened to "first come, first served"? :frown: |
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by nethead
(Post 9583307)
Yes, I think maybe that's where they get mixed up, but like I said I heard an adult say 'on accident' recently that's when I wondered if it's more widespread than I had thought. You would say 'by accident' wouldn't you?
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by another bloody yank
(Post 9583334)
I honestly don't know what I would say/have said anymore.:blink:
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 9582458)
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve." |
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by another bloody yank
(Post 9583334)
I honestly don't know what I would say/have said anymore.:blink:
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 9583339)
I know exactly what you mean. :blink:
|
Re: A language question
On accident? Very odd. Do they say something is 'on the cards' or 'in the cards'? I'm thinking I might have heard Americans use the latter.
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by General Tojo
(Post 9583406)
On accident? Very odd. Do they say something is 'on the cards' or 'in the cards'? I'm thinking I might have heard Americans use the latter.
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 9582458)
"First come, first serve."
|
Re: A language question
Originally Posted by General Tojo
(Post 9583406)
On accident? Very odd. Do they say something is 'on the cards' or 'in the cards'? I'm thinking I might have heard Americans use the latter.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:03 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.