![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12760884)
Mayor of New York on his resume though, which is a stronger qualification than some other candidates... I somehow doubt he's running because of Warren's tax plans.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12760943)
Mayor of New York didn't help Bill De Blasio.
As you seem to have a singularly negative opinion of Bloomberg, what did you think of his time as mayor? |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12760978)
What I saw of De Blasio was exceptionally unimpressive and had nothing to do with him being Mayor of New York. Of course, one Mr Giuliani was also Mayor of New York!
As you seem to have a singularly negative opinion of Bloomberg, what did you think of his time as mayor? |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12760991)
My opinion of Bloomberg isn't really relevant, as I was just commenting that I don't see why we really need another old white male billionaire in the Democratic primary. The one we already have isn't doing too well.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12761044)
So you're going to judge Bloomberg by how Steyer is doing? As opposed to judging him on his owns merits (or lack thereof)?
I suppose he could run as the guy who tried to ban Big Gulps. I'm sure that will be a big vote winner. |
Re: 2020 Election
I don't often agree with Zargof, but I do in this case. Yawn.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12760892)
He’s thinking of running because he assumes - quite correctly - that none of the current crop of Democrats have a snowball’s chance in hell of beating Trump in 2020. Whether he’s got the chops remains to be seen but if he does run then at least it’ll put the idea of resurrecting Hillary firmly to bed.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12761086)
I'm thinking that he might get my vote at this point.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12761086)
I'm thinking that he might get my vote at this point.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Is that psychic lady still in the running?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12761115)
Is that psychic lady still in the running?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12761264)
Yes and she still is a better option than Mike Bloomberg.
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/ne...ds/2150503001/ |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12761496)
Indeed. I want to know where Bloomberg stands on this . . . :sneaky:
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/ne...ds/2150503001/ |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12761499)
I had just popped a cannabis candy into my mouth; you have to use these powers for good, Superwoman!
Even medical marijuana isn't consistent across states. Stupid. I could easily become a one issue voter in 2020. As an independent voter I am working on a checklist: 1) Must support legalization. 2) Must not be Donald Trump. The former is negotiable the latter is not. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12761092)
Interesting. I remember you saying that you thought Biden and Sanders were too old. Mikey B is 77.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:08 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.