![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Boiler. You are always on point.
And not always appreciated. I do. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 12665535)
Not my problem. I vote for people to address that problem. I personally don't care in the slightest.
If they slave for me it leads to $$$. 10% increase every year. (Although what if that productivity was applied to their own country of citizenship..hmmm' Love 'em. Legally wrong of course.. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12665538)
Well let's assume you make them Americans, will they want to do the jobs Americans do not want to do? Will they want to work plucking fruit whatever (I will ignore that very few do now)
So what happens then? Reminds me of the we need young people because we are getting old arguments, well young people get old as well. So you end up in the same situation so what do you do then, rinse and repeat? Then you have to consider all those people who would like to move to the US and do not have an option, well if it is just get here and we will give you amnesty what happens then? Now I also can see the other side, there is a big shortage where I am of reliable people to work minimum wage jobs, but then the price of accommodation etc is a factor and bringing in more people seems unlikely to help that. |
Re: 2020 Election
So Gianteaxe
Are you benefiting from illegals the way I do? $$$ Do you care one way or the other personally? I don't. Do you want to overturn the current immigration laws? By voting. Do you want the illegal aliens to get a shortcut to citizenship? There are plenty of legal visas for temp workers, Of course you're in the city of needles and poops. What are you doing about that? (I enjoy your posts..no personal issues with you but SF residents seem to love illegal aliens and I don't know why? I came on L1. Adobe) |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 12665555)
So Gianteaxe
Are you benefiting from illegals the way I do? $$$ Do you care one way or the other personally? I don't. Do you want to overturn the current immigration laws? By voting. Do you want the illegal aliens to get a shortcut to citizenship? There are plenty of legal visas for temp workers, Of course you're in the city of needles and poops. What are you doing about that? I readily admit I don't have a solution. I think the best we can do is start to chip away at the margins, for example by giving those that came under a certain age a path to legality. Additionally, it's all essentially pointless unless and until the employment of undocumented workers is treated as a significant crime and prosecuted as such. Right now, employers essentially can employ such workers with impunity. For example, the boyfriend of a friend is an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador. He's been here around 20 years. He's employed by a transport company in SF who can treat him like shit and provide none of the benefits that they do to legal workers. I came on an L1 too and am a citizen now. |
Re: 2020 Election
Ok I get you.
Peace man... (Avoid those poops.) |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12665549)
So what's your solution to the "facts on the ground"?
What I would like to know, and this goes for quite a few other issues, is what the proponents of change expect their change to produce. Some of it seems simple to forecast, and there are intelligent people making these proposals, I do not know Castro but assume he is no dummy. So what am I lead to believe, they have not considered the consequences, they have but do not care, somebody else's problem? Or they think the change, and we are talking a massive change is good. So many other areas they talk about 5 or 10 years whatever, GND etc talks about what will happen by 2100, so why ignore other positions like this. I am not expecting definite numbers. On Global Warming not sure if anybody has taken into account migration flows, if we have large numbers moving from areas where their carbon footprint is low to areas where it is high, then that strikes me as of consequence, seems to be a factor of 20 difference in many cases. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12665564)
I presume I am benefiting in the sense that I can't vouch for the legality of every worker that serves me, be it in a restaurant or when my condo building was repainted etc etc.
I readily admit I don't have a solution. I think the best we can do is start to chip away at the margins, for example by giving those that came under a certain age a path to legality. Additionally, it's all essentially pointless unless and until the employment of undocumented workers is treated as a significant crime and prosecuted as such. Right now, employers essentially can employ such workers with impunity. For example, the boyfriend of a friend is an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador. He's been here around 20 years. He's employed by a transport company in SF who can treat him like shit and provide none of the benefits that they do to legal workers. I came on an L1 too and am a citizen now. |
Re: 2020 Election
Gabon is where Tarzan grew up.
Factoid. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12665564)
for example by giving those that came under a certain age a path to legality.
That's on their parents who initiated the illegal action. Don't you agree? Otherwise it would be such a draw to come here with a young child/baby/pregnant...and that's not a sensible immigration policy. Or is it? I'm no expert. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 12665622)
I hardly think giving citizens of another country who came here, or were brought here, illegally should have a path to citizenship that cuts in front of legal qualified applicants.
That's on their parents who initiated the illegal action. Don't you agree? Otherwise it would be such a draw to come here with a young child/baby/pregnant...and that's not a sensible immigration policy. Or is it? I'm no expert. I will say it again - if someone is willing to risk their life getting here in the back of a truck, they are on a different level from the likes of me who got here thanks to a good education and a valuable skill. The concept of 'fairness' and 'queue jumping' just doesn't enter into it. Those who come here illegally aren't taking any 'space' or 'position in queue' from anyone else trying to get here legally. |
Re: 2020 Election
Most people don't care about their neighbors next door.
Let alone those on the other side of town. Even less citizens of another country. Most care about their loved ones, (some) family, and their pets. Human nature. Lip service is easy though. 'Those who come here illegally aren't taking any 'space' or 'position in queue' from anyone else trying to get here legally.' They do take significant resources collectively, and some of them do kill citizens and legal residents. Pretty nasty for someone who has no right to be here in the first place. Just a fact. Indefensible. Whatever your rational they have no right to be here. Agree? |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 12665622)
I hardly think giving citizens of another country who came here, or were brought here, illegally should have a path to citizenship that cuts in front of legal qualified applicants.
That's on their parents who initiated the illegal action. Don't you agree? Otherwise it would be such a draw to come here with a young child/baby/pregnant...and that's not a sensible immigration policy. Or is it? I'm no expert. |
Re: 2020 Election
Which visa?
And would that be a sensible immigration policy? Anyone from anywhere in the world? I don't know. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hotscot
(Post 12665689)
Which visa?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:02 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.