![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12117416)
Red meat for the gullible (of which a lot are Trump supporters) and typical Trump deflection from actual issues. Expect a lot of this over the next four years.
|
Re: 2016 Election
He seems to be a follower of the Fake News media. Now claiming that he really won the popularity vote. This is very worrying
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12117293)
The money for this audit is being crowd-sourced. The level of government debt is irrelevant to this discussion.
Besides, the US has plenty of money, it's just isn't allocated very well. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12117416)
Red meat for the gullible (of which a lot are Trump supporters) and typical Trump deflection from actual issues. Expect a lot of this over the next four years.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dc koop
(Post 12117551)
He seems to be a follower of the Fake News media. Now claiming that he really won the popularity vote. This is very worrying
I was thinking about what his foreign policy will be ? On one hand seems he is saying USA should disengage from "nation building" etc, on the other he will decisively eradicate ISIS etc. Waiting to see what actual plan he tries to implement. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12117527)
I know. Look at us all right now. Jumping down rabbit holes.
And a lot of people aren't aware enough to be able to see it. https://newrepublic.com/article/1390...gic-well-truth |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12118022)
This is a good piece. It's not just the facts that Trump ignores, it's logic itself.
And a lot of people aren't aware enough to be able to see it. https://newrepublic.com/article/1390...gic-well-truth Here is a list of Trump's campaign promises: ‘I will give you everything.’ Here are 282 of Donald Trump’s campaign promises It is full of instances where one promise makes another promise impossible. For example: 12) Leave the federal minimum wage at $7.25 per hour, which is already too high. 13) Raise the federal minimum wage to $10 per hour, as $7.25 is too low and "the minimum wage has to go up." |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12118058)
... $7.25 per hour, which is already too high ...
What would he have thought a reasonable hourly rate was, then? $5? $2? What a twat. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12118058)
Great piece and it really shows how much Trump counts on the politeness of others. He lies, to the point where he even contradicts his own lies, to get whatever he wants. Then he lies about the lies he told --- right to the face of the person he lied to originally. This is what he does in all of his "deals", lies incessantly until he "wins" and then reneges on all of his promises by lying about what he promised.
Here is a list of Trump's campaign promises: ‘I will give you everything.’ Here are 282 of Donald Trump’s campaign promises It is full of instances where one promise makes another promise impossible. For example: 12) Leave the federal minimum wage at $7.25 per hour, which is already too high. 13) Raise the federal minimum wage to $10 per hour, as $7.25 is too low and "the minimum wage has to go up." Trump seems to have done some sort of deal to keep some jobs from moving to Mexico, but if the identical widget costs twice as much when made in the US compared to Mexico it can only be temporary. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12118067)
To be fair they all do that. Hillary certainly had her moments.
Trump seems to have done some sort of deal to keep some jobs from moving to Mexico, but if the identical widget costs twice as much when made in the US compared to Mexico it can only be temporary. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12118067)
Trump seems to have done some sort of deal to keep some jobs from moving to Mexico, but if the identical widget costs twice as much when made in the US compared to Mexico it can only be temporary.
Of course nearly every article you see in the media only talk about the jobs and not the associated tax break. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12118068)
Get over the Hillary fetish. She's not president. Besides, I thought Hillary was horrible and awful and needed to be killed, hanged and/or locked up. Right? So, if she was really that horrible, why is her record constantly being used to justify Trump's behavior.
My Family were in the Motor Vehicle Industry and I remember vaguely that being impacted with initially Japanese imports, a combination of cost, cheap transportation and design. The situation has progressed much more since then, with open markets any Politician going for high wages and benefits in the US when the costs elsewhere are significantly lower is lying. Design is very moveable. If you have 2 identical products, one made in the US, one made elsewhere and which is significantly cheaper which one do you buy? You end up with relatively high wages but no employment. So the spiel I grew up with was that you moved into areas which were more technological, did not understand then and I do not now how that insulated you, why could those jobs also not be done elsewhere cheaper? The only end game surely is that costs equalise, well there or there about. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12118079)
The deal is Carrier has to keep 1000 jobs in Buttfck, Indiana and in return the owners get a nice tax break which more than offsets extra expense of keeping those jobs.
Of course nearly every article you see in the media only talk about the jobs and not the associated tax break. But then of course you end up with everybody needing one. Somebody else can do the Maths but it ends in tears. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12118079)
The deal is Carrier has to keep 1000 jobs in Buttfck, Indiana and in return the owners get a nice tax break which more than offsets extra expense of keeping those jobs.
Of course nearly every article you see in the media only talk about the jobs and not the associated tax break. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12118085)
Trump made such and "example" of Carrier during the election, I'm sure they had no choice but to keep some American jobs for fear of boycott. Meanwhile, Trump's companies keep buying everything from China.
If Trump really does want to "bring the jobs back", then he should start advocating for Bernie Sanders' Outsourcing Prevention Act. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:01 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.