![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 12012628)
Winning the most votes is a fairly common method of winning the nomination. As it turns out, she won the most votes.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12012522)
I like Libertarians that are principled as they're about the only ones who will actually say we need to cut the defense budget. The problem is they tend to have some funny economic ideas, worshiping at the altar of Hayek and Rand. That plus the social Darwinism means I could never support them
Should the government invade other countries and shoot at the locals just for fun? No. Should the government keep you from smoking pot? No. Should the government prevent you from being gay married? No. Should the government protect you from corporations that want to data mine and nickel-and-dime you to death? No. Should the government do anything to keep you from starving to death or dying of cancer? No. And so on. Just say no. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 12012628)
Winning the most votes is a fairly common method of winning the nomination. As it turns out, she won the most votes.
Helps if you hassle the other member so much that she resigns though don't u think :sneaky: |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12012685)
Scandal rocks Democratic Party truce on eve of confab | Daily Mail Online
Helps if you hassle the other member so much that he resigns though don't u think :sneaky: |
Re: 2016 Election
Sorry my bad should be she as in Shultz after screwing up his campaign. But I am sure u know what I am talking about anyhow :@)
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12012685)
Scandal rocks Democratic Party truce on eve of confab | Daily Mail Online
Helps if you hassle the other member so much that she resigns though don't u think :sneaky: In any case, Debbie Wasserman Schultz's secret disdain for Bernie Sanders' candidacy was such a secret that the voters didn't know about it. And given that most folks don't even know who she is, her opinions of Sanders were probably irrelevant to virtually all of them, anyway. Bernie Sanders lost the primary because he was less popular than Hillary Clinton. His failure to connect with minority voters was a particular issue for him, being that he specializes in retail politics for white people. Much of the American electoral landscape does not resemble Vermont's. If Sanders wanted to win, then he should have been more popular than she was. You win some, you lose some. |
Re: 2016 Election
Lot of love for Hillary on here, Trump has no chance. Someone should do a poll and see who will win the expat vote.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12012805)
Lot of love for Hillary on here, Trump has no chance. Someone should do a poll and see who will win the expat vote.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12012805)
Lot of love for Hillary on here, Trump has no chance. Someone should do a poll and see who will win the expat vote.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 12012811)
I haven't seen much love for Hillary. I've seen a lot of 'I'll go for the lesser of two evils' comments though. That doesn't scream love to me. :lol:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 12012811)
I haven't seen much love for Hillary. I've seen a lot of 'I'll go for the lesser of two evils' comments though. That doesn't scream love to me. :lol:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Pretty classy move by Sanders at the roll call.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12012824)
Pretty classy move by Sanders at the roll call.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12012833)
I loved it.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12012833)
I loved it.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:39 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.