British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   2016 Election (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/2016-election-855107/)

BEVS Jun 30th 2016 3:51 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Steerpike (Post 11990514)
Yikes. I blame The Mad Pooper for jumping in and turning it into an insult-fest.

Tell you what. It is my Friday afternoon here in New Zealand and TMP now needs somewhere else to take a dump, so I'll take it upon myself & move it back for you all. *

* we reserve the right to bung some other thread in here just to make up the numbers.

Wintersong Jun 30th 2016 5:30 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by BEVS (Post 11990711)
Tell you what. It is my Friday afternoon here in New Zealand and TMP now needs somewhere else to take a dump, so I'll take it upon myself & move it back for you all. *

* we reserve the right to bung some other thread in here just to make up the numbers.

I wuv wu :wub:

Leslie Jul 1st 2016 12:45 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Order has been restored. Let's just hope that unBrexit goes this smoothly. :starsmile:

zargof Jul 1st 2016 1:57 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
The Clintons really don't help themselves. What was Bill thinking having a meeting with Loretta Lynch? I'm sure it was all perfectly innocent, as if there was anything nefarious, they would have never made it known in public. But the optics are terrible.

Is Bill just trying to keep it interesting seeing as how Trump has imploded.

scrubbedexpat099 Jul 1st 2016 4:14 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11991040)
I'm sure it was all perfectly innocent

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Remember laws are for little people.

Leslie Jul 1st 2016 11:13 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11991040)
The Clintons really don't help themselves. What was Bill thinking having a meeting with Loretta Lynch? I'm sure it was all perfectly innocent, as if there was anything nefarious, they would have never made it known in public. But the optics are terrible.

Is Bill just trying to keep it interesting seeing as how Trump has imploded.

It's always this kind of crap that the Clintons can't seem to stop themselves from doing. I don't think there was any big political machinations --- not because Bill Clinton is above doing so but rather because Lynch is better than that. If the Clintons were actually trying to influence the investigation then they would have sent their minions in to do a reverse black bag operation, not by Bill throwing his weight around on the tarmac. Stupid and entitled behavior on his part though.

Anian Jul 5th 2016 3:56 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Looks like Hillary is in the clear for the emails.

Jerseygirl Jul 5th 2016 4:32 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Anian (Post 11994483)
Looks like Hillary is in the clear for the emails.

Unbelievable. :rolleyes:

Giantaxe Jul 5th 2016 4:40 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 11994514)
Unbelievable. :rolleyes:

What criminal offences do you think Clinton committed?

Jerseygirl Jul 5th 2016 4:53 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 11994523)
What criminal offences do you think Clinton committed?

Non of course...it's a vast right wing conspiracy.

If nothing else it shows her ignorance and stupidity...totally unfit to be POTUS.

zargof Jul 5th 2016 5:04 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 11994523)
What criminal offences do you think Clinton committed?

So the defence now is "they didn't find enough evidence to indict me, it's all good."

Time for a new campaign slogan. Either go old school with the Nixonian "I am not a crook.", or try and appeal to Sanders younger supporters with "Not indicted bitches!"

Giantaxe Jul 5th 2016 5:08 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 11994531)
Non of course...it's a vast right wing conspiracy.

Were Condoleza Wright and Colin Powell's use of private emails also examples of this "vast right wing conspiracy"?


Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 11994531)
If nothing else it shows her ignorance and stupidity...totally unfit to be POTUS.

In the eyes of some, I'm sure. But to me it pales into insignificance compared to the "extremely careless" manner the Bush Administration invaded Iraq. Didn't stop him being re-elected.

Giantaxe Jul 5th 2016 5:09 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11994543)
So the defence now is "they didn't find enough evidence to indict me, it's all good."

Time for a new campaign slogan. Either go old school with the Nixonian "I am not a crook.", or try and appeal to Sanders younger supporters with "Not indicted bitches!"

I see Sanders' supporters don't like the result of the "FBI Primary".

zargof Jul 5th 2016 5:17 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 11994547)
I see Sanders' supporters don't like the result of the "FBI Primary".

Sanders' supporters don't like political corruption and the influence of money in politics.

So you think "Not indicted bitches!" is the way to go?

Giantaxe Jul 5th 2016 5:21 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11994554)
Sanders' supporters don't like political corruption and the influence of money in politics.

So you think "Not indicted bitches!" is the way to go?

I'd say the way to go was to admit it was a mistake to use a private email server.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:58 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.