Wikiposts

2016 Election

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 2:22 pm
  #4516  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 2016 Election

Bill's latest comments on race should stir the pot.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 3:47 pm
  #4517  
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,206
From: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Leslie
He will.
I imagine he's looking at making a recess appointment. That would be temporary, but not sure how temporary. Would it be until the end of the current session of the Senate? I suppose they would be in session, after their present recess, until the end of the year. If he did that, it would do some damage, for sure.

Further on something RoadWarrior discussed earlier. A deadlocked Supreme Court does mean that the decision in the lower Circuit Court would stand. However, a 4 - 4 decision essentially has no precedential value. That means that another Circuit could come up with an opposite decision (taking up a case similar to the teacher's union case now on appeal from the 9th Circuit, for example) and simply follow the opinion they like best as guidance. There could then be two opposing rulings from the Circuits, which would position a third teacher's union case to go before the Supremes, when they're fully stocked, to settle the contradiction.

Maybe my learned friend, the RoadWarrior, could add to this.

Last edited by FlaviusAetius; Feb 15th 2016 at 3:50 pm.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:00 pm
  #4518  
dakota44's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 27,078
From: Nova Scotia Canada
dakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
I imagine he's looking at making a recess appointment. That would be temporary, but not sure how temporary. Would it be until the end of the current session of the Senate? I suppose they would be in session, after their present recess, until the end of the year. If he did that, it would do some damage, for sure.

Further on something RoadWarrior discussed earlier. A deadlocked Supreme Court does mean that the decision in the lower Circuit Court would stand. However, a 4 - 4 decision essentially has no precedential value. That means that another Circuit could come up with an opposite decision (taking up a case similar to the teacher's union case now on appeal from the 9th Circuit, for example) and simply follow the opinion they like best as guidance. There could then be two opposing rulings from the Circuits, which would position a third teacher's union case to go before the Supremes, when they're fully stocked, to settle the contradiction.

Maybe my learned friend, the RoadWarrior, could add to this.
A recess appointment is good until the senate convenes in the following session...and they can confirm or deny at that time.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:06 pm
  #4519  
jeepster's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 429
jeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond reputejeepster has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Leslie
I am happy with 1 & 3.

Hitting Jeb and W with 9/11 is, in my mind, below the belt. I have never believed, nor bought into any of the conspiracy theories regarding the matter. 9/11 wasn't W's fault any more than it was Clinton's fault. It just happened. Anyhoodles, and the reason I thought to respond specifically, Trump has been on TV doubling down on blaming Bush(s) for 9/11.
The Bush's are an international crime family. There's been volumes written on them, Kitty Kelley, Kevin Phillips, Russ Baker, just to name a few. And it's about time W started answering for 9-11. He had a free pass on the incident.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:13 pm
  #4520  
Jerseygirl's Avatar
SUPER MODERATOR
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 89,088
Jerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond reputeJerseygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by jeepster
The Bush's are an international crime family. There's been volumes written on them, Kitty Kelley, Kevin Phillips, Russ Baker, just to name a few. And it's about time W started answering for 9-11. He had a free pass on the incident.
Both the Bush's and the Clinton's are up to their necks in it. It's time for new blood...whoever or whatever party that should be.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:22 pm
  #4521  
sir_eccles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,106
From: Phoenix, AZ
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
I imagine he's looking at making a recess appointment. That would be temporary, but not sure how temporary. Would it be until the end of the current session of the Senate? I suppose they would be in session, after their present recess, until the end of the year. If he did that, it would do some damage, for sure.
Sorry to burst your bubble but Obama has already made it clear there will be no recess appointment and he is waiting until they get back. Clearly keeping things above board it is then on Congress to muck it up.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:35 pm
  #4522  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,212
From: San Francisco
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by sir_eccles
Sorry to burst your bubble but Obama has already made it clear there will be no recess appointment and he is waiting until they get back. Clearly keeping things above board it is then on Congress to muck it up.
If I were Obama, I'd fulfill my constitutional obligation by nominating Sri Srinavasan, who was confirmed by a 97-0 vote for the DC circuit. That would leave the Republicans, who didn't have a single dissenting voice, to explain why he can't even get a hearing this time around.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:51 pm
  #4523  
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,206
From: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
If I were Obama, I'd fulfill my constitutional obligation by nominating Sri Srinavasan, who was confirmed by a 97-0 vote for the DC circuit. That would leave the Republicans, who didn't have a single dissenting voice, to explain why he can't even get a hearing this time around.
Much as we usually disagree about everything, we might actually have been better off if you were Obama. Then again...
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 4:55 pm
  #4524  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,212
From: San Francisco
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Much as we usually disagree about everything, we might actually have been better off if you were Obama. Then again...
He hasn't nominated anyone yet.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 5:19 pm
  #4525  
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,206
From: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
He hasn't nominated anyone yet.
That was only partially my point.
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 6:05 pm
  #4526  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 2016 Election

What is the time frame that the Senate have to consider the nomination?
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 6:59 pm
  #4527  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Has this Rubio ad been mentioned at all?

Vancouver featured in Marco Rubio campaign ad - British Columbia - CBC News



Seems someone doing his ads thinks Vancouver, BC is in the US.....
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 7:02 pm
  #4528  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 2016 Election

Unless your ancestors, every one of you, are 100 per cent, 100 per cent from sub-Saharan Africa, we are all mixed-race people.
Bill
 
Old Feb 15th 2016 | 10:25 pm
  #4529  
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,206
From: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Jsmth321
Has this Rubio ad been mentioned at all?

Vancouver featured in Marco Rubio campaign ad - British Columbia - CBC News



Seems someone doing his ads thinks Vancouver, BC is in the US.....
Could be an ominous sign for our good friends in the Great White North.
 
Old Feb 16th 2016 | 1:23 am
  #4530  
Bloody Yank
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,186
From: USA! USA!
RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by dc koop
Obama should tell the GOP to go **** themselves and nominate someone to replace Scalia. A lame duck president has done that before and in fact it's happened about six times in history. It's not for the republicans to deny him that right

More than likely the GOP majority will shoot it down but it might be some payback for all the grief the racist, do nothing Congress has been handing him for 7 years
The GOP is trying to use Scalia's replacement as a tool for increasing Republican turnout and providing them with a wedge issue. A recess appointment would just help the GOP to use this to their advantage by giving them a reason to unify.

This would also a lousy experience for any of these appointments, who will end up being put through the ringer for what may be no job at all.

Obama et. al. need to figure out how to turn this one around on the Republicans so that it's the Dems who benefit. In the interim, it actually helps the Democrats to have some of these 5-4 decisions turned into 4-4 ties.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.