Wikiposts

2016 Election

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 27th 2015, 2:38 pm
  #1966  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Read the "Think Progress" (yeah, love the totally non-partisan flavour of that name) article. Looks like political payback in the works. What's fun is watching the anguished voices comparing the sleaze they foresee to that in Texas and Mississippi - when they border on that shining example of political rectitude, Illinois (oh, yeah, forgot, that one's run by the Democrats).

Here's an example of the hysteria expressed when a favourite political cudgel is snatched off the table:
“It’s going to be a free-for-all,” warned Bottari. “It’s going to be a wild, wild, West.” “This will allow corruption to flourish,” added Heck. “We used to be the shining model state for elections, campaign finance reform, ethics, all that stuff. Now we’re somewhere between Texas and Mississippi in the state of our ethics, and anything goes and the money flows.”

Scott Walker Is Ready To Turn Back The Clock On Ethics And Campaign Finance In Wisconsin | ThinkProgress

Colour me cynical.

Last edited by FlaviusAetius; Oct 27th 2015 at 2:40 pm.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 2:54 pm
  #1967  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Read the "Think Progress" (yeah, love the totally non-partisan flavour of that name) article. Looks like political payback in the works. What's fun is watching the anguished voices comparing the sleaze they foresee to that in Texas and Mississippi - when they border on that shining example of political rectitude, Illinois (oh, yeah, forgot, that one's run by the Democrats).

Here's an example of the hysteria expressed when a favourite political cudgel is snatched off the table:
“It’s going to be a free-for-all,” warned Bottari. “It’s going to be a wild, wild, West.” “This will allow corruption to flourish,” added Heck. “We used to be the shining model state for elections, campaign finance reform, ethics, all that stuff. Now we’re somewhere between Texas and Mississippi in the state of our ethics, and anything goes and the money flows.”

Scott Walker Is Ready To Turn Back The Clock On Ethics And Campaign Finance In Wisconsin | ThinkProgress

Colour me cynical.
Yeh, that was funny comparing them to Texas and Mississippi :-) But what you haven't done is explain why this is a good idea.

Oh, and Walker's stance predates the termination of his hopeless run for president:

Scott Walker: Dismantle independent elections and ethics board | Politics and Elections | host.madison.com

Last edited by Giantaxe; Oct 27th 2015 at 2:59 pm.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:03 pm
  #1968  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

"As He Drops Trump Says Polls ‘Not Scientific’"

Ah, the irony...

https://radio.foxnews.com/2015/10/27...ot-scientific/
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:05 pm
  #1969  
BE Practitioner (Level 2)
 
username.exe's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,403
username.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Any predictions for the third Republican debate tomorrow night?

Will any of the candidates do damage to Trump or Carson?
Will anyone have a breakout moment?
Can any of the candidates get their campaign jumpstarted?

Since it's going to be on CNBC, you'll need a cable subscription. However, there is a workaround where you can sign up for CNBC Pro's free 7 day trial (but you need to cancel before the week is up or it'll charge your card).
CNBC Pro
username.exe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:07 pm
  #1970  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
Yeh, that was funny comparing them to Texas and Mississippi :-) But what you haven't done is explain why this is a good idea.

Oh, and Walker's stance predates the termination of his his hopeless run for president:

Scott Walker: Dismantle independent elections and ethics board | Politics and Elections | host.madison.com
Well, other states manage to keep the sleaze within acceptable bounds without having a "John Doe" procedure. That sounds too much like an invitation for activists to anonymously cooperate with hyper-partisan DAs to tie up political opponents with endless investigations and with strategic leaks to the press to destroy those political opponents on the thinnest of charges. I'm talking about the procedure, not that it didn't maybe correctly bag 6 of Walker's people. But there is an urge in this country to criminalize political opposition.

Glad to see we're not too far apart. I'm not saying Walker is lily-white. He's survived a relentless campaign to bring him down and he's now just as hard-boiled and cutthroat as his opponents.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:08 pm
  #1971  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by username.exe
Will any of the candidates do damage to Trump or Carson?
Trump will trash Carson.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:17 pm
  #1972  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Well, other states manage to keep the sleaze within acceptable bounds without having a "John Doe" procedure. That sounds too much like an invitation for activists to anonymously cooperate with hyper-partisan DAs to tie up political opponents with endless investigations and with strategic leaks to the press to destroy those political opponents on the thinnest of charges. I'm talking about the procedure, not that it didn't maybe correctly bag 6 of Walker's people. But there is an urge in this country to criminalize political opposition.
The board is independent and has nabbed corruption in both major parties.

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Glad to see we're not too far apart. I'm not saying Walker is lily-white. He's survived a relentless campaign to bring him down and he's now just as hard-boiled and cutthroat as his opponents.
I think he's always been cutthroat. I do think the Democrats made a bad tactical error in trying to recall him in '12 though.

Last edited by Giantaxe; Oct 27th 2015 at 3:27 pm.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:25 pm
  #1973  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Agree. Trump will trash Carson - in, for him, the nicest way possible. Too easy to lose points for being the bully. No one else has the chutzpa to touch Carson.

Fiorina will try to get a break-out by going after The Hill. Auditioning for VP if, as is likely, she can't get to the top. Like Hillary she's going to play the gender card, but not as overtly.

Let's see if Cruz can vault into second place if either Trump or Carson fall a couple of spots and Bush and Rubio cancel each other out. [Is Leslie rooting for Cruz?]

Game of Thrones continues tomorrow night.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:34 pm
  #1974  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
The board is independent and has nabbed corruption in both major parties. FIFY
Hard to believe any organization in this country, charged with cleaning the political stables or running things, is "independent." From the US Supreme Court with its incessant party line votes, (and the Florida Supreme Court in 2000?), to the FCC, EPA, NLRB, the weaponized IRS, DOJ and FBI, to the thousands of DAs around the country, everything is charged with politics.

If the Wisconsin board has nabbed crooks in both parties one would probably have to look at which party was in the majority on the board when someone got bagged.

We need to import some Canadians to clean up our shite-filled barns.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:37 pm
  #1975  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
We need to import some Canadians to clean up our shite-filled barns.
Only if we can import their list of acceptable ids as well
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:53 pm
  #1976  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
Only if we can import their list of acceptable ids as well
Oh, right....but how would "the pure" obtain them without having to lift a finger?
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 3:59 pm
  #1977  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Oh, right....but how would "the pure" obtain them without having to lift a finger?
It would be pretty difficult not to have at least something on the Canuck list.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 4:22 pm
  #1978  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
It would be pretty difficult not to have at least something on the Canuck list.


Yeah. Utility bills are on their list. That worked in 2012. There is a story, undoubtedly apocryphal, that several busloads of Chicago residents were bused into Wisconsin to vote - early and often, of course. They all had photocopies of utility bills and were accompanied by a lawyer who threatened to sue the poll workers if they didn't let his people register and vote. So they did and they did, and then boarded their buses and motored to the next county to repeat the process - probably with a fresh sheaf of utility bills.

In 2012, 48,000 people registered to vote in Milwaukee on election day, 17% of the total. It would take an army of people weeks to pore through the voter registration and voting records, check the addresses and who lives there, probably to find no one at the address. No one has the time and money to do that, ergo, voter fraud is hardly ever proved.

Sorry, that's all the fun I can have tonight. See you all tomorrow.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 4:26 pm
  #1979  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Well I do agree on the world scale our federal election is a non-issue.

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Perhaps the difference is that since the Americans are electing the "Leader of the Free World" the election here matters to some extent. Canada's election has about as much effect on the world as the elections in Denmark.

Obama was trying to turn the country into a large, cozy multi-culti Denmark; but the people here aren't quite comfortable with the "transforming America" into a scandinavian-style social democracy gig. And they're not as polite as our friends in the Great White North either.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Oct 27th 2015, 4:31 pm
  #1980  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,894
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius


Yeah. Utility bills are on their list. That worked in 2012. There is a story, undoubtedly apocryphal, that several busloads of Chicago residents were bused into Wisconsin to vote - early and often, of course. They all had photocopies of utility bills and were accompanied by a lawyer who threatened to sue the poll workers if they didn't let his people register and vote. So they did and they did, and then boarded their buses and motored to the next county to repeat the process - probably with a fresh sheaf of utility bills.

In 2012, 48,000 people registered to vote in Milwaukee on election day, 17% of the total. It would take an army of people weeks to pore through the voter registration and voting records, check the addresses and who lives there, probably to find no one at the address. No one has the time and money to do that, ergo, voter fraud is hardly ever proved.

Sorry, that's all the fun I can have tonight. See you all tomorrow.
You'd think that a governor so intent on voter id to "combat fraud" would be able to investigate this and find such "obvious" voter fraud to bolster this case. Like this, for example:

"GOP’s voter fraud humiliation: Turns out Wisconsin’s worst case is a Republican"

GOP’s voter fraud humiliation: Turns out Wisconsin’s worst case is a Republican - Salon.com

Last edited by Giantaxe; Oct 27th 2015 at 4:34 pm.
Giantaxe is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.