President Biden
#2371

Get over yourself, I'm not moving goalposts at all, I'm merely illustrating that many attitudes that were commonplace 75 years ago are n not so now, and where they do exist they are quite rightly vilified. They never used to be, certainly not by the majority. We get it, Churchill was a bit of a bastard, but it was 75 years ago, learn from it and move on.
(but yes, you moved your goalposts)
Last edited by kimilseung; Jan 23rd 2021 at 11:37 pm.
#2372
Account Closed
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0


...and I am saying that those attitudes are far from rare, under the surface they still burn, and that these recent years in the USA, and to an extent other places has, displayed how fragile our norms of today are. Turning blind eyes, promoting when we benefit from actions over others suffering, does not help to keep them buried it helps foster their return.
#2373
#2374
Account Closed
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0


Not defensive, just stating a fact, you draw conclusions on someone based on one aspect of their opinion, and it's beyond you to entertain the possibility that you're wrong. Of course the fascists, white supremacists still exist, no-one is denying that but many have had that badge pinned on them unfairly because they don't subscribe fully to the views of you and your ilk. It's a very good way to make someone seem unreasonable and easier to tear down.
#2375

Not defensive, just stating a fact, you draw conclusions on someone based on one aspect of their opinion, and it's beyond you to entertain the possibility that you're wrong. Of course the fascists, white supremacists still exist, no-one is denying that but many have had that badge pinned on them unfairly because they don't subscribe fully to the views of you and your ilk. It's a very good way to make someone seem unreasonable and easier to tear down.
#2376

Why in hell would you include Fauci in that group? He is not a politician, nor holding elected office. He is a world renowned virologist who is extremely intelligent, knowledgeable and well respected around the world. He is fine just where he is, doing what needs to be done.
I agree he is doing a great job. But should anyone at that age be the key leader for such an important role? Or should he be introducing a team of equally impressive scientists that he has mentored such that public faith is still maintained in the inevitable event of Fauci’s retirement? For example, according to Wiki, Faucis deputy at NIAID is Hugh Auchincloss. Does he have Faucis public profile or popularity?
I am not pointing fingers at the individuals and the quality of the jobs they are doing. I am concerned about a lack of acknowledgment that none of us live forever. Having an equally qualified and publicly known team/deputy/alternative around them, ensures continuity.
by presenting them as uniquely qualified to do the job, there is a great risk that there is a lack of public confidence when you get to the day they are unable to do the job. The unspoken strategy of having a younger and vibrant, popular deputy works for Biden, why not Fauci too?
#2377


#2379

Senator Johnson seems to be trying to strong-arm the Biden administration.
https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/st...90865935884293
Also posting this to the Trump thread..
https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/st...90865935884293
Also posting this to the Trump thread..
Not to mention the firings after falling out.
#2380
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0


Protesters clash with authorities outside Portland ICE facility
https://nypost.com/2021/01/24/protesters-clash-with-authorities-outside-portland-ice-facility/
“If you trespass on federal property with a weapon . . . you will be arrested,” a recording played to the crowd additionally warned.
When the order to clear out went unheeded, tear gas was launched into the mass of protesters.
When the order to clear out went unheeded, tear gas was launched into the mass of protesters.
#2381
Heading for Poppyland










Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 13,218












OK, thanks, your assumption is duly noted.
#2382
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319












Protesters clash with authorities outside Portland ICE facility
https://nypost.com/2021/01/24/protes...-ice-facility/
I assumed Biden would not want to be known for tear gassing MPP's.
https://nypost.com/2021/01/24/protes...-ice-facility/
I assumed Biden would not want to be known for tear gassing MPP's.
1. Did Biden actually personally tear gas anyone? No... I presuming the on-scene commander actually ordered it as well, and that Biden probably wasn't even consulted.
2. I assumed prior to it happening that no U.S. President would want to to be known as someone who tear gassed people doing nothing, just so they could be photographed outside a church... Now we've both made incorrect assumptions.
But you're not going to let a few facts dissuade you from trying to pin every negative on Biden, are you?
Last edited by DaveLovesDee; Jan 24th 2021 at 10:06 pm.
#2383

I said it last year, and it's so much more relevant today after the Capitol events. Smashing up property, rioting and looting, should be perfectly valid justification for being tear-gassed and locked up.
Last edited by Steerpike; Jan 24th 2021 at 11:29 pm.
#2384

Because he is a public servant and Director of NIAID.
I agree he is doing a great job. But should anyone at that age be the key leader for such an important role? Or should he be introducing a team of equally impressive scientists that he has mentored such that public faith is still maintained in the inevitable event of Fauci’s retirement? For example, according to Wiki, Faucis deputy at NIAID is Hugh Auchincloss. Does he have Faucis public profile or popularity?
I am not pointing fingers at the individuals and the quality of the jobs they are doing. I am concerned about a lack of acknowledgment that none of us live forever. Having an equally qualified and publicly known team/deputy/alternative around them, ensures continuity.
by presenting them as uniquely qualified to do the job, there is a great risk that there is a lack of public confidence when you get to the day they are unable to do the job. The unspoken strategy of having a younger and vibrant, popular deputy works for Biden, why not Fauci too?
I agree he is doing a great job. But should anyone at that age be the key leader for such an important role? Or should he be introducing a team of equally impressive scientists that he has mentored such that public faith is still maintained in the inevitable event of Fauci’s retirement? For example, according to Wiki, Faucis deputy at NIAID is Hugh Auchincloss. Does he have Faucis public profile or popularity?
I am not pointing fingers at the individuals and the quality of the jobs they are doing. I am concerned about a lack of acknowledgment that none of us live forever. Having an equally qualified and publicly known team/deputy/alternative around them, ensures continuity.
by presenting them as uniquely qualified to do the job, there is a great risk that there is a lack of public confidence when you get to the day they are unable to do the job. The unspoken strategy of having a younger and vibrant, popular deputy works for Biden, why not Fauci too?
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/about/hugh-auchincloss-md
#2385
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,012












I guess I've lived in this country longer than most on here.... Fauci is an absolute public health hero for his recognition of and work on the AIDS/HIV crisis from the early '80's onwards. He received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from George W Bush in 2008, having been described as an American hero by Bush Senior during a presidential debate in 1988. This country owes a great debt to him.
https://drt.cmc.edu/2020/03/23/georg...fauci-in-1988/
https://drt.cmc.edu/2020/03/23/georg...fauci-in-1988/