Post EU Referendum
Banned










Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724













Strawman argument - I have not complained about the cultural, ethnic, religious mix of London and the UK. Look up my previous posts and show me specifically where I have.


I am saying that you directly benefit from things that you have not directly paid for. You may consider that you have paid for "your piece" of a national education system, for example. But common goods are things into which we collectively pay - and which our elected government helps to accomplish - to accomplish an end that individuals alone cannot. Individualism is not an adequate concept for explaining how a society functions well (god knows I know that, living where I do). If the population were not as a whole educated, there would be ramifications far beyond "services" and they would impact you, and all of us, negatively.

Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,835












We could have said the same as you until 3 months ago. The amount of top class treatment a family member is getting and will continue to get for some time would have taken everything we all possessed without the NHS, and we go down on our knees in thanks for it.


What you pay for the NHS for example and other benefits is a form of insurance which YOU might one day need.
We could have said the same as you until 3 months ago. The amount of top class treatment a family member is getting and will continue to get for some time would have taken everything we all possessed without the NHS, and we go down on our knees in thanks for it.
We could have said the same as you until 3 months ago. The amount of top class treatment a family member is getting and will continue to get for some time would have taken everything we all possessed without the NHS, and we go down on our knees in thanks for it.


I am saying that you directly benefit from things that you have not directly paid for. You may consider that you have paid for "your piece" of a national education system, for example. But common goods are things into which we collectively pay - and which our elected government helps to accomplish - to accomplish an end that individuals alone cannot. Individualism is not an adequate concept for explaining how a society functions well (god knows I know that, living where I do). If the population were not as a whole educated, there would be ramifications far beyond "services" and they would impact you, and all of us, negatively.


What you pay for the NHS for example and other benefits is a form of insurance which YOU might one day need.
We could have said the same as you until 3 months ago. The amount of top class treatment a family member is getting and will continue to get for some time would have taken everything we all possessed without the NHS, and we go down on our knees in thanks for it.
We could have said the same as you until 3 months ago. The amount of top class treatment a family member is getting and will continue to get for some time would have taken everything we all possessed without the NHS, and we go down on our knees in thanks for it.



Reasonable Bitch










Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 18,139












There's actually little difference in how the NHS is paid for than say, in Germany. The difference seems to be that in Britain, it's part of taxation, so it's less differentiated, while in much of "the rest of the world", you're obliged to buy health insurance. Often, that "insurance" is state-subsidised, such as AOK in Germany. In any case, you still pay for it. It isn't "free" (unless of course, you're stint). And healthcare isn't "free" anywhere. Not even in Britain. The system simply gives the public the impression that it is.
Now, as Britain's economics inevitably downsize, it begs the question of whether the NHS is sustainable under the current system. It needs more money, but there's less to go around, so how does that square with reality?
Now, as Britain's economics inevitably downsize, it begs the question of whether the NHS is sustainable under the current system. It needs more money, but there's less to go around, so how does that square with reality?


And you are saying that subsidising someones housing in one of the most expensive locations in the world is a common good? That a warehouse worker in a rough part of Wolverhampton should pay more tax for the "common good" of keeping a single mum ensconced in a flat in Chelsea rather than somewhere cheaper?
I am quite capable of recognizing straw men when I see them you know.


Parliament won't be "stopping" us from leaving. If anything, the exit is likely to be "harder" due to Parliament not passing whatever idiocy May and Davis come up with.


Have a read:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/common-good


Anyway, Parliament will now get a look-in.
Parliament to get binding vote on final Brexit deal - BBC News
Parliament to get binding vote on final Brexit deal - BBC News
If no deal, the UK will jump without Parliament approval ...


Article 50 has been declared and approved, so we will be leaving - that has already been approved. The terms of the leaving have not, because the government has been unable to produce any.

Banned










Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26,724












There are no fecund immigrants.
Was it your twin bother who posted those comments.
