Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Europe > Spain
Reload this Page >

Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10th 2013, 1:07 pm
  #61  
BE Forum Addict
 
Retired in Euskadi's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Elorrio, Bizkaia
Posts: 1,032
Retired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by Lynn R
I meant "we" as in Western civilisations, not just the British. I know it is not our people who are committing these atrocities and injustices, but we wade into warfare with certain countries claiming we are doing it to remove tyrants or fight terrorism, when it's nothing of the kind, only to protect our economic interests. Tyrants and despots exist all over the world entirely unmolested by the USA, Britain or anybody else because there's no economic payback for getting involved. Saudi Arabia is the biggest funder of terrorism there is, so why do all the Western economies bend over backwards to appease them (even suppressing legal investigations into corruption involving bribes paid to get lucrative contracts awarded - and yes I know it was Tony Blair who did that) whilst we go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan? Only today it has been reported in the press that a 17 year old girl has been beheaded there.

Maybe it's not possible to change it, but I really can't stomach continually patting ourselves on the back and maintaining an attitude of moral superiority over "them", when we operate purely on the basis of self-interest. Just at least be honest about it.
I would agree; we have nothing to pat ourselves on the back for.

What really gets me is the wholesale fashion for dumbing down of our whole Judaeo-Christian history to the level of inconsequence. What's happened in the past has happened & we cannot change it; nor should we "apologise" because it cannot be undone. All we can try to do is learn from the past mistakes & resolve not to repeat them, though that also is a tall order looking at some of our policies!
Retired in Euskadi is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2013, 1:30 pm
  #62  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749
cricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by retired in euzkadi
What really gets me is the wholesale fashion for dumbing down of our whole Judaeo-Christian history to the level of inconsequence. What's happened in the past has happened & we cannot change it; nor should we "apologise" because it cannot be undone. All we can try to do is learn from the past mistakes & resolve not to repeat them, though that also is a tall order looking at some of our policies!
Well exactly, the problem is that Britain has always relied on repressing the rest of the world in order for the nobles and upper class to get rich - and this history continues unabated
cricketman is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2013, 2:39 pm
  #63  
BE Forum Addict
 
Pocaloca's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,041
Pocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by cricketman
Well exactly, the problem is that Britain has always relied on repressing the rest of the world in order for the nobles and upper class to get rich - and this history continues unabated
Plus ça change ...

World's 100 richest people got $241 billion richer in 2012

All the money the banks "lost".
All the money taken from the hospitals.
All the money taken out of education.
All the money they've taken from the poor, the sick, the unemployed.
It hasn't all just simply disappeared. It had to go somewhere.
Pocaloca is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2013, 9:19 pm
  #64  
On the road again.
 
Dick Dasterdly's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: On Top of the World
Posts: 17,507
Dick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond reputeDick Dasterdly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by cricketman
Well exactly, the problem is that Britain has always relied on repressing the rest of the world in order for the nobles and upper class to get rich - and this history continues unabated
Ah yes, much like the Spanish did in the Americas you mean and would still love to be able to do now, if they hadn't cocked it all up.
Dick Dasterdly is offline  
Old Jan 11th 2013, 6:05 am
  #65  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Domino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond reputeDomino has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by cricketman
Well exactly, the problem is that Britain has always relied on repressing the rest of the world in order for the nobles and upper class to get rich - and this history continues unabated
didn't have you down as a communist, but then didn't they do the same thing ??
Domino is offline  
Old Jan 11th 2013, 8:08 am
  #66  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749
cricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by Domino
didn't have you down as a communist, but then didn't they do the same thing ??
I'm not a communist, but then I'm not a liberal capitalist. I think I'm a "sustainable capitalist", to put a label on it. Maybe it will catch on
cricketman is offline  
Old Jan 15th 2013, 12:16 pm
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
amideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by cricketman
I'm not a communist, but then I'm not a liberal capitalist. I think I'm a "sustainable capitalist", to put a label on it. Maybe it will catch on
Yeah, I fondly remember when I first realised that idealistic liberalism consistently achieved the opposite of the intended effect.

I sense you might actually be peeking out of the closet now. Welcome to sunlight, CMan.
amideislas is offline  
Old Jan 17th 2013, 3:38 pm
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
amideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond reputeamideislas has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?


Absolute nonsense as usual

The wealth is distributed in fewer hands now than it was 50 years ago - and the rich are richer than they were then

I dont want to hand out money to anybody, I want the world to be less reliant on creating money (read debt, the whole economy is based on destributing debt, the money doesnt actually exist) and instead to sustainably use the resources which they have around them.

That doesnt mean that we would live in poverty, because we would still have antibiotics, electricity, hospitals, transport etc, but everyone would use less energy and earn less money, but they would receive more reliant on the people they live around, their community and local resources
OK, you win... we're far worse off than we have ever been (except for Spain, of course, which is the only utopia on the planet).

Back in the old days, everybody used to be so prosperous, so kind, and never treated anyone with disrespect, never engaged in racism, aggressive behaviour, sexual misconduct, greed or fraud, corruption, war, murder, or any other unthinkable act. These things are all products of the last 50 years of evolution. Before that, it was never heard of.

Unlike the "good old days" virtually everyone on the planet (except for the Spanish, of course) is now racist, a greedy banker, a thief, a sexual deviate, a liar, a murderer, an extortionist, a corrupt war-mongering politician, or some other sort of criminal (or so you often seem to believe).

Too bad we can't go back to the good ol' days when all that ugly stuff was either swept under the rug, or denied altogether. Ignorance was indeed bliss, wasn't it?
amideislas is offline  
Old Jan 17th 2013, 5:22 pm
  #69  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 553
notacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by Pocaloca
Plus ça change ...

World's 100 richest people got $241 billion richer in 2012

All the money the banks "lost".
All the money taken from the hospitals.
All the money taken out of education.
All the money they've taken from the poor, the sick, the unemployed.
It hasn't all just simply disappeared. It had to go somewhere.
This assumes a zero sum world economy when in fact the wealth of the world is constantly growing.

You assume Peter must be robbed to pay Paul when in fact Peter is growing and so is Paul.

All the money the banks "lost".

The money was never there to be lost. What was lost was the inflated value of assets on their books.

All the money taken from the hospitals.

No money was taken from hospitals - only that which was used to pay for goods and services.

All the money taken out of education.

Ditto

All the money they've taken from the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

Money was taken off the rich in taxes to pay the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

If the rich didn't get richer, it would mean they weren't paying taxes, and public spending wouldn't be what it is.

"All the money taken" is in fact the reduction of public spending not underpinned by taxes and borrowed by extravagant governments.
notacontrathinker is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 8:14 am
  #70  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749
cricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by notacontrathinker
This assumes a zero sum world economy when in fact the wealth of the world is constantly growing.

You assume Peter must be robbed to pay Paul when in fact Peter is growing and so is Paul.

All the money the banks "lost".

The money was never there to be lost. What was lost was the inflated value of assets on their books.

All the money taken from the hospitals.

No money was taken from hospitals - only that which was used to pay for goods and services.

All the money taken out of education.

Ditto

All the money they've taken from the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

Money was taken off the rich in taxes to pay the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

If the rich didn't get richer, it would mean they weren't paying taxes, and public spending wouldn't be what it is.

"All the money taken" is in fact the reduction of public spending not underpinned by taxes and borrowed by extravagant governments.
Not at all - you have mixed up thinking

The world isnt getting richer, it is getting more in debt. The world is in debt to itself in the tune of trillions of dollars. Money isnt made, it is invented by governments and banks, they simply type some numbers into a computer and it appears

The mega-rich take the invented money from the national institutions and then expect everyone else to pay it back
cricketman is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 8:43 am
  #71  
BE Forum Addict
 
Pocaloca's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,041
Pocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond reputePocaloca has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by notacontrathinker
This assumes a zero sum world economy when in fact the wealth of the world is constantly growing.

You assume Peter must be robbed to pay Paul when in fact Peter is growing and so is Paul.

All the money the banks "lost".

The money was never there to be lost. What was lost was the inflated value of assets on their books.

All the money taken from the hospitals.

No money was taken from hospitals - only that which was used to pay for goods and services.

All the money taken out of education.

Ditto

All the money they've taken from the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

Money was taken off the rich in taxes to pay the poor, the sick, the unemployed.

If the rich didn't get richer, it would mean they weren't paying taxes, and public spending wouldn't be what it is.

"All the money taken" is in fact the reduction of public spending not underpinned by taxes and borrowed by extravagant governments.
Oh I must have got it wrong then. So the banks didn't really need bailing out because they never had the money in the first place? Spain isn't littered with unfinished hospitals, and schools aren't being forced to increase class sizes? Public sector workers haven't had their pay cut by 22% on average? And all those rich people pay their taxes like dutiful citizens?

I must be reading the wrong papers.
Pocaloca is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 12:42 pm
  #72  
BE Forum Addict
 
Retired in Euskadi's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Elorrio, Bizkaia
Posts: 1,032
Retired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond reputeRetired in Euskadi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by cricketman
Not at all - you have mixed up thinking

The world isnt getting richer, it is getting more in debt. The world is in debt to itself in the tune of trillions of dollars. Money isnt made, it is invented by governments and banks, they simply type some numbers into a computer and it appears

The mega-rich take the invented money from the national institutions and then expect everyone else to pay it back
You seem to have something against the rich. Nothing wrong with having wealth as such. It's how you acquire it & what you do with it that counts. If certain people wish to send their children to Eton, so what?

The rich & the poor will always be with us.
There are many rich people who give a lot of their money away without needing to.
There are many poor people whose only desire is to become richer.
And the vast majority of us probably lie somewhere in the middle.

Yes, there is a lot of inequality in the world, whether financial, spiritual, physical, political or economical.
In the end, probably the system we have is a great deal better than the lot of the poor people in places like North Korea, Cuba, sub-Saharan Africa, not to mention Arab dictatorships like Syria or Yemen.
I've yet to see hoards of people queueing up to go & live in Cuba, North Korea, Russia or the Arab dictatorships.
But don't let us become complacent either.
Let's be a bit more positive about the world.
Retired in Euskadi is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 1:29 pm
  #73  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749
cricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by retired in euzkadi
You seem to have something against the rich. Nothing wrong with having wealth as such. It's how you acquire it & what you do with it that counts. If certain people wish to send their children to Eton, so what?

The rich & the poor will always be with us.
There are many rich people who give a lot of their money away without needing to.
There are many poor people whose only desire is to become richer.
And the vast majority of us probably lie somewhere in the middle.

Yes, there is a lot of inequality in the world, whether financial, spiritual, physical, political or economical.
In the end, probably the system we have is a great deal better than the lot of the poor people in places like North Korea, Cuba, sub-Saharan Africa, not to mention Arab dictatorships like Syria or Yemen.
I've yet to see hoards of people queueing up to go & live in Cuba, North Korea, Russia or the Arab dictatorships.
But don't let us become complacent either.
Let's be a bit more positive about the world.
I have nothing against the rich per se, I myself am incredibly rich, relatively...

The argument that we have it better than countries under repressive regimes is one that is trotted out regularly to make sure that we "thank our lucky stars" and maintain the status quo

That doesnt change my opinion that our economic system is built on a house of cards and inherently unfair

Btw, the biggest problem that regimes have that go against their neighbours political thinking, is that they then have nobody to trade with. This is Cuba's biggest problem. It is actually a country that is run incredibly well (I've seen it for myself). Something for the UK to think about when discussing whether to leave the EU...
cricketman is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 2:49 pm
  #74  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 553
notacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of lightnotacontrathinker is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by Pocaloca
Oh I must have got it wrong then....
The world isnt getting richer

The tangible wealth of the world is increasing. There are more houses, buildings, shops, roads, railways, airports, ports, cars, trains etc,etc,etc, and more people with full bellies wandering around the planet than in all it’s history.

The world is in debt to itself in the tune of trillions of dollars

Debt is not evil. Should I walk around in sackcloth and ashes because I have taken out a car loan ? Add up all the car loans, mortgages, loans for other goods for all the people in the world, and it WILL come to trillions. Trillions is a fairly new word used by the press to try and scare us. We love to be scared. Move along there, there is nothing to see here.

Money isnt made, it is invented by governments and banks, they simply type some numbers into a computer and it appears

Impossible. There is a money market out there that insists this is not done.

The mega-rich take the invented money from the national institutions and then expect everyone else to pay it back

How do Richard Branson, Bill Gates and wotsisname Zuckerman et al actually do this ?

So the banks didn't really need bailing out because they never had the money in the first place?

More or less correct. The treasury put in place measures to ensure that if there was a run on the banks the government would guarantee payment. The run didn’t happen and the money wasn’t really needed. For doing this the government managed to pick up a couple of cheap banks. The losers were the owners of the bank.

The British government were able to do this because their word is as good as gold around the world, whereas someone like defaulting Iceland’s word is now worth doodly squat.

Spain isn't littered with unfinished hospitals ?

Shouldn’t have started them in the first place without a full and viable financial plan. Any idiot can start a hospital, get the credit for it then quietly drop it.

schools aren't being forced to increase class sizes ?

Do you mean there were too few pupils in the past to fill the classrooms and it is now being brought up to the correct level, or do you mean there has been bad planning. After all you should be able to extrapolate from the number of births the school places required years ahead. What’s this got to do with the mega-rich ?

Public sector workers haven't had their pay cut by 22% on average ?

You shouldn’t borrow to increase the public sector, because when you can’t borrow anymore, you have to lose workers or pay everybody less.

And all those rich people pay their taxes like dutiful citizens?

I suggest to you that the mega-rich pay scrupulous attention to their tax affairs, and would try extremely hard to avoid even inadvertently ending up in a cold jail cell.

However, if we are talking Spanish rich, or even ever-so-slightly Spanish rich, then ‘no’. Tax evasion seems to rival pentanque as the national sport.

I must be reading the wrong papers

I am cursed (or blessed) in the last eight years by not being able to get hold of British newspapers very easily here, and I’ve only just been re-hooked upto the inter-thingy. My information tends to come from TV – BBC, SKY, CNN, Al-Jazeera, Euronews, and the Spanish Channels.

Now I know these channels give a slanted view of the world, but after coming out of quarantine I am appalled by the unresearched garbage spouted out by all the British press and accepted as gospel by seemingly intelligent people.

How many papers correctly forecast Guadiola’s move to MB? Right! Now apply that to the rest of the crap they pump out.
notacontrathinker is offline  
Old Jan 18th 2013, 3:05 pm
  #75  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749
cricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond reputecricketman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Were the western Empires totally bad news?

Originally Posted by notacontrathinker
The world isnt getting richer

The tangible wealth of the world is increasing. There are more houses, buildings, shops, roads, railways, airports, ports, cars, trains etc,etc,etc, and more people with full bellies wandering around the planet than in all it’s history.

The world is in debt to itself in the tune of trillions of dollars

Debt is not evil. Should I walk around in sackcloth and ashes because I have taken out a car loan ? Add up all the car loans, mortgages, loans for other goods for all the people in the world, and it WILL come to trillions. Trillions is a fairly new word used by the press to try and scare us. We love to be scared. Move along there, there is nothing to see here.

Money isnt made, it is invented by governments and banks, they simply type some numbers into a computer and it appears

Impossible. There is a money market out there that insists this is not done.

The mega-rich take the invented money from the national institutions and then expect everyone else to pay it back

How do Richard Branson, Bill Gates and wotsisname Zuckerman et al actually do this ?

So the banks didn't really need bailing out because they never had the money in the first place?

More or less correct. The treasury put in place measures to ensure that if there was a run on the banks the government would guarantee payment. The run didn’t happen and the money wasn’t really needed. For doing this the government managed to pick up a couple of cheap banks. The losers were the owners of the bank.

The British government were able to do this because their word is as good as gold around the world, whereas someone like defaulting Iceland’s word is now worth doodly squat.

Spain isn't littered with unfinished hospitals ?

Shouldn’t have started them in the first place without a full and viable financial plan. Any idiot can start a hospital, get the credit for it then quietly drop it.

schools aren't being forced to increase class sizes ?

Do you mean there were too few pupils in the past to fill the classrooms and it is now being brought up to the correct level, or do you mean there has been bad planning. After all you should be able to extrapolate from the number of births the school places required years ahead. What’s this got to do with the mega-rich ?

Public sector workers haven't had their pay cut by 22% on average ?

You shouldn’t borrow to increase the public sector, because when you can’t borrow anymore, you have to lose workers or pay everybody less.

And all those rich people pay their taxes like dutiful citizens?

I suggest to you that the mega-rich pay scrupulous attention to their tax affairs, and would try extremely hard to avoid even inadvertently ending up in a cold jail cell.

However, if we are talking Spanish rich, or even ever-so-slightly Spanish rich, then ‘no’. Tax evasion seems to rival pentanque as the national sport.

I must be reading the wrong papers

I am cursed (or blessed) in the last eight years by not being able to get hold of British newspapers very easily here, and I’ve only just been re-hooked upto the inter-thingy. My information tends to come from TV – BBC, SKY, CNN, Al-Jazeera, Euronews, and the Spanish Channels.

Now I know these channels give a slanted view of the world, but after coming out of quarantine I am appalled by the unresearched garbage spouted out by all the British press and accepted as gospel by seemingly intelligent people.

How many papers correctly forecast Guadiola’s move to MB? Right! Now apply that to the rest of the crap they pump out.
Excellent post

This should be copied and supplied to schools everywhere to show how your average man on the street has no idea about how the economy works You've managed to supply the wrong answer to every question. Well done!
cricketman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.