|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11303917)
I don't think LIW was being defensive...she was saying she doesn't mind if it is removed, It will be removed shortly.
And before this gets out of hand - I nor anyone else (other than the poster) made a request that I can see for it to be removed. :blink: |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303921)
Thank you.
It didn't look that large on the site I grabbed it from, honest guv. I don't think it is a large file actually since it's just a screen grab so it won't suck up too much power, it's just in a large format. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303992)
I see LIW has her own personal mod ...
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...c0FCFIoGeVxYUd Please note the small picture size, too ;) |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303992)
I see LIW has her own personal mod to act as shortstop quickly rustled up from TIO using the back channel
And before this gets out of hand - I nor anyone else (other than the poster) made a request that I can see for it to be removed. :blink: I can and I did. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303992)
I see LIW has her own personal mod to act as shortstop quickly rustled up from TIO using the back channel
And before this gets out of hand - I nor anyone else (other than the poster) made a request that I can see for it to be removed. :blink: You presume too much...nice try trying to stir things up again though. :sneaky: |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11303927)
You never know what size a pic will post at until it is posted, unless you preview the post before submitting.
It won't be a large file size, probably just a few megs, it's the pixels that determine the physical size of the image on screen. Bit of a non issue really, unless your internet is really shit, I suppose. Like 1995 dial-up shit. |
Re: PDT v TIO
*drops to knees, holds hands up to the heavens and screams* "Why god, why?!?! Why the injustice of it all?" *falls onto the ground in anguish*
|
Re: PDT v TIO
I had gone back to look at the offending picture again. Didn't realise it had gone now, which is fair enough but I did see this:
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303056)
Ooh, sorry, that's a bit bigger than I was expecting.
|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11304019)
I had gone back to look at the offending picture again. Didn't realise it had gone now, which is fair enough but I did see this:
We all, every one of us, missed a very obvious 'said the choirboy to the priest' moment. We should all be very ashamed of ourselves ... |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11304029)
We were leaving it for you ;)
I've let the side down :( |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11304034)
Arsebags. I was speed-reading posts yesterday as I wasn't on most of the weekend.
I've let the side down :( |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11304044)
Must try harder.
|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11304044)
Must try harder.
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 11304048)
So the title suggests a fight between TIO and PDT.... Do we know who's winning yet?
|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 11304048)
So the title suggests a fight between TIO and PDT.... Do we know who's winning yet?
|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11304054)
A clear lead for PDT on pettifogging detail and paranoia.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:28 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.