Name and Shame
#16
Nothing wrong with being cautious. ON the flip side though, I notice you have an employment offers forum here. What would happen if someone took a job there and wasn't paid at the end of the month?
Could the user then sue BE for damages? Or would it come down to individual responsibility?
It's the same argument and a different policy is used for it.
Could the user then sue BE for damages? Or would it come down to individual responsibility? It's the same argument and a different policy is used for it.
However, if I post up "SoJohn Motors are thieves and should not be trusted as they will destroy your car engine as their staff are not trained", the damage is done and SoJohn motors' reputation is sullied, even if I was just being mischievous and the fault had not been theirs
#17
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 489
From: Valdovino, Galicia











I'm not discussing policy. I already said I can agree with it and would probably do the same myself. The legal argument just makes no sense (despite what your solicitor said). I also said if someone posted a topic you just gave an example of it should be deleted
Perhaps I should tell Google that YouTube is doomed to failure. I'll send them the name of your solicitor
Or I'll tell Inetinteractive that their chain of forums are leaving them open to lawsuits

Perhaps I should tell Google that YouTube is doomed to failure. I'll send them the name of your solicitor

Or I'll tell Inetinteractive that their chain of forums are leaving them open to lawsuits
#18
Yes, by all means if it makes you happy 
Can we leave it at that now please
Its forum policy....I dont make the rules .... its not my forum and I dont have to take the risks.
I'm locking the thread now, for as I said we're not suppose to discuss moderation policy on line, and the reasons for the rule have already been given

Can we leave it at that now please
Its forum policy....I dont make the rules .... its not my forum and I dont have to take the risks.
I'm locking the thread now, for as I said we're not suppose to discuss moderation policy on line, and the reasons for the rule have already been given




