Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

She has a boyish figure when undressed, no hips.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Yeh, disappointing.
When did you see her stripped off anyway ? :confused: ;)

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Yesterday:lol:

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

They should have listened to me and just shut up.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

they had Penny Junor on Radio 4 yesterday and she was saying that William is strong on his own privacy, although he accepts there has to be some interest as he is heir to the throne (while we still have one). But he can be like a rabid dog when it comes to the privacy of his wife, her family and his friends, feeling they shouldnt be subjected to such intrusion

as the chateau is owned by David Linley and stands in 640 acres of woodland how much closer can someone get.?
considering the threats that have been made against Harry whilst in Afghanistan surely shooting William or his wife would have as many brownie points in the mad mad islamic world.......

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

The publication concerned have presumably made a judgement call that if they are sued and have to pay damages the amount they have to pay will be less than the money made from additional sales.

It does all seem like a storm in a D cup. (Or less as she's so skinny) Presumably she could be seen by hotel and security staff and its not that unusual for young women to sunbathe topless these day.

The Royals may have a pact with the British press (which gives access when they want to and an agreement not to publish when they don't) but that is never going to work with the foreign press. William may have a thing about it because of his mother but it comes with the territory and there's not that much he can do about it - unless he can abdicate in advance and give up his royal status.

Otherwise, if they don't want to be seen without their clothes on they should keep them on except when they are 100% certain they can't be seen. Just like any other celebrity.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Many more I would have thought.

Come to think of it, it could probably just as easily have been a sniper with telescopic sights on a hi powered rifle. :eek:

Maybe those photos could be a timely warning to brush up on security.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Bang on mate; a stick insect with tits.:eek:

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

....If they can take a photo..then they can shoot you from the same distance.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

They are entitled to their privacy without having to worry about a photographer with a long range lens taking pictures. What next photographs taken from satellites?
If my privacy was breached I would be outraged.
Put yourself in their position. How would you feel if you were photographed without your permission at a private location whether you had clothes on or not and then the photographs are published around the world.
I just do not see how you can imply it is their own fault.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

I agree, there must have been staff around the chateau, maids, cleaners, security,cooks etc, anyone of these could possibly have seen her and I personally wouldn't risk it in these circumstances. Keeping your bra on is not too high a price to pay for such a priveleged life.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Look hard at this photo..what do you see.

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Looks like Harry's lost his pants again. :blink:

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

Goodone Dick..now try this one..

Re: Much ado about nothing?
 

They don't look real to me, unless they're a pair of those silicone jobs.

Heard another report that other photos show Kate enjoying a ciggy,(or a spliff),not that I've anything against it, of course. ;) :D