![]() |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by jdr
(Post 7866973)
Funny how people who think he is innocent kept stumm for 19 years till he was released and did bugger all to help him before.
PS Mitz you`re missing Man ure on Spanish tv. ;-)) Theres been a lot done and said since he was convicted JD, I've always held this view but theres naff all I could ever do to change things .... even if I did feel that strongly about it
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867028)
Oh and if you look hard Billy Boy you will see that not ALL the victims families felt he was innocent. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
(Post 7867049)
\
Not all the victims families think he was guilty ;):lol: |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867054)
I am aware of that but I didn't imply they did, conversely it has been implied the opposite.
I wonder how quick they will be to refund all that if his conviction is ever overturned? By the way, post Lockerbie, there was a massive cash payment made to a terrorist group who were caught using gear very similar to that used in Lockerbie according to an article posted in the lounge. Sadly there was no direct link proven which would have been nice. Matt, if you are going to post with the grownups, could you please stick to adult postings which steer clear f cheap stupidinsults which frankly do your case no good. You might notice that when you are polite to me (which isn't often) and post sensibly then I am always polite to you. When you are childish and abusive, then I will always take pleasure in rubbing your face in your mess, just like I would a poorly house trained puppy. In short, play nice, and I'll be nice to you. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 7867095)
Sweetie, I fear you are being silly again.
Oh and no, I didn't read a single word past the word "again" |
Re: Lockerbie
Do you know what, I have just read back through the thread and realised something. I, at no point replied to Chim Chimeny and yet he tried to ridicule and dismiss me out of the discussion, I never even spoke to him, Mitz and I were having a discussion and he decided to make some twattish Dick Van Dyke comment about me having all the secret information.... What's the matter Billy? You not getting any at the moment so you feel that you need to drive people away in case they disagree with you?
Sad little man, really really sad. |
Re: Lockerbie
Come on you two.
Its an interesting discussion, and some of the put downs are quite funny, but dont spoil it by bringing in your personal unending hatred of each other :D |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867104)
Do you know what, I have just read back through the thread and realised something. I, at no point replied to Chim Chimeny and yet he tried to ridicule and dismiss me out of the discussion, I never even spoke to him, Mitz and I were having a discussion and he decided to make some twattish Dick Van Dyke comment about me having all the secret information.... What's the matter Billy? You not getting any at the moment so you feel that you need to drive people away in case they disagree with you?
Sad little man, really really sad. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
(Post 7867108)
Come on you two.
Its an interesting discussion, and some of the put downs are quite funny, but dont spoil it by bringing in your personal unending hatred of each other :D |
Re: Lockerbie
Please dont fall out.
Personal differences thats all it is. Just like the smoking thread. I appreciate the input from both of you.:) |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by paintermujer
(Post 7867123)
Please dont fall out.
Personal differences thats all it is. Just like the smoking thread. I appreciate the input from both of you.:) I will say this. If he stops the silly remarks, and debates sensibly, then I will never agan be rude to him. He is intelligent, and capable of carrying out an interesting discussion. Hell, he even gets karma from me when I think he's posted something really good. I just think it's a shame that so many threads have to slide into this silliness because he seems to have taken such a dislike to me. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 7867132)
Well, if you notice, whenever matt is polite to me I am polite to him. If he is rude to me, I return the compliment. That makes him angry.
I will say this. If he stops the silly remarks, and debates sensibly, then I will never agan be rude to him. He is intelligent, and capable of carrying out an interesting discussion. Hell, he even gets karma from me when I think he's posted something really good. I just think it's a shame that so many threads have to slide into this silliness because he seems to have taken such a dislike to me. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867136)
Post number 20 Bill.
Tell you what, why don't we call it quits and just be polite to each other? OK? |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 7867152)
Yeah, on that occasion I was a bit forward. Perhaps because you are so fast with posts like 21.
Tell you what, why don't we call it quits and just be polite to each other? OK? |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by paintermujer
(Post 7867155)
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 7867157)
It would be nice.
We have always appreciated your input for us.:eek::lol: |
Re: Lockerbie
In 1988, the US shot down an Iranian private aircraft, killing 290 innocent people. The same year, someone brought down a private American aircraft killing 270 innocent people. Both the US and the Lybians paid out large sums in compensation for each incident.
We live in a murky and horrible world, worthy of discussion at every level, but name-calling should have no part in it. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 7867376)
In 1988, the US shot down an Iranian private aircraft, killing 290 innocent people. The same year, someone brought down a private American aircraft killing 270 innocent people. Both the US and the Lybians paid out large sums in compensation for each incident.
We live in a murky and horrible world, worthy of discussion at every level, but name-calling should have no part in it. |
Re: Lockerbie
Can I say something without being shouted down please? I´ve been watching this thread with interest, not least because two of my favourite posters (both of whom are knowledgeable in their different ways) are at one anothers throats over something we really cannot possibly know the answer to. Stop it the both of you. All this rhetoric is not going to convince either of you to change your minds. Agree to disagree, please, I´m sure we will never know the truth, whatever it is.
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by paintermujer
(Post 7867155)
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
Oh and bil, don`t worry about the dehydration thread unpayed donation by you to the kids charity, as I have made a donation for you cos you whelched on it when you was proved wrong again. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by jdr
(Post 7867419)
Fraid it will never work out that way, bil thinks he is always right and if you don`t agree then he tries to belittle you with stupid childish comments.
Oh and bil, don`t worry about the dehydration thread unpayed donation by you to the kids charity, as I have made a donation for you cos you whelched on it when you was proved wrong again. Cheers mate, thats just helped me NO END!!! |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867395)
There is actually just as much of a link to the Irish as the Iranians.
I suppose you're going to start calling me names, I don't mind, I'm both an emmet and a grockel, meaning that I know Devon and Cornwall like the back of my hand.and I would still be there if it ever stopped raining. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 7867451)
I was just going to ask why?, but that would make me just as silly as your response.
I suppose you're going to start calling me names, I don't mind, I'm both an emmet and a grockel, meaning that I know Devon and Cornwall like the back of my hand.and I would still be there if it ever stopped raining. I was happily discussing the subject and I was attacked. Unreal, if you have nothing to add to the discussion, blame Matt... brilliant tactics! |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867462)
Have you actually read this thread?
I was happily discussing the subject and I was attacked. Unreal, if you have nothing to add to the discussion, blame Matt... brilliant tactics! As I understand it, you're working on a sheep farm in Devon, and you've worked as a barman in Spain, I'm not being condescending, but it hardly qualifies you to comment in the way that you do. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 7867515)
Have I read this thread? Yes. And all you've done is to attack other posters and call them names. You're not interested in the subject matter, for some reason, you just want to continue some silly game stretching back over the years.
As I understand it, you're working on a sheep farm in Devon, and you've worked as a barman in Spain, I'm not being condescending, but it hardly qualifies you to comment in the way that you do. Oh and No I don't work on a sheep farm, I have sheep, but I work for no one except myself.... and no, I didn't just work in a bar, among other numerous things I am a Master saddler and have a Horticultural Masters.... oh and unlike so many people commenting on this subject I have first hand at not only the Middle East but also some of the complexities of the situation.....now if thats OK for you let me know.... Now if we are calling peoples eligibility to comment on this subject shall we all shut up? |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7867395)
There is actually just as much of a link to the Irish as the Iranians.
|
Re: Lockerbie
Many seem to be convinced of his guilt while others are certain he innocent on here, I doubt anyone on here is that well imformed to be certain.
I think whats wrong here is that the man was convicted of such a heinous crime that all "normally" rules should have been thrown aside and he should have been lept in jail unless his lawyers proved his innocence(and I say that as someone who thinks his convicion was dubious to say the least) but he was found guilty and now we will never know what evidence he/his lawyers had to prove different. I wnder if he was told to drop his appeal...what is it that they don't want us to know?!(or perhaps there is nothing) Now we will never really know.... |
Re: Lockerbie
I cannot be bothered trawling through all the posts on this.
Guilty or not, on his own in this or not, the Government that set him free made a terrible mistake. They knew that he would return to a `Heroes Welcome` because the Middle East have a childish mentality and will accept him as a hero and this will stick in the throats of the victims` families |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by gedscottish
(Post 7867595)
Many seem to be convinced of his guilt while others are certain he innocent on here, I doubt anyone on here is that well imformed to be certain.
I think whats wrong here is that the man was convicted of such a heinous crime that all "normally" rules should have been thrown aside and he should have been lept in jail unless his lawyers proved his innocence(and I say that as someone who thinks his convicion was dubious to say the least) but he was found guilty and now we will never know what evidence he/his lawyers had to prove different. I wnder if he was told to drop his appeal...what is it that they don't want us to know?!(or perhaps there is nothing) Now we will never really know.... |
Re: Lockerbie
Interesting article just published in the Mail.
I feel this one is going to run and run! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...h-justice.html |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by Fred James
(Post 7869197)
Interesting article just published in the Mail.
I feel this one is going to run and run! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...h-justice.html |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
(Post 7869224)
Well, what do you say to that evidence RM? :)
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7869427)
Daily Mail.... need I say more?
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by fionamw
(Post 7869441)
...if you read to the end, it appears to be from the Independent....
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7869446)
Really? I read the same article in the Mail on Sunday about 2 hours ago.
I haven't seen a hard copy of a paper in days, but if you follow the link & read the online comments, someone suggests the information was disclosed first (or at least earlier) by The Independent. |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by fionamw
(Post 7869458)
I haven't seen a hard copy of a paper in days, but if you follow the link & read the online comments, someone suggests the information was disclosed first (or at least earlier) by The Independent.
|
Re: Lockerbie
ok the guy is a nutter but at least he has got to be the most outspoken MP there is.... loath,hate or love him... unique he certainly is....
http://blogs.dailyrecord.co.uk/georgegalloway/ |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7869427)
Daily Mail.... need I say more?
Its the evidence that is being reported that is the point, not the paper. |
Re: Lockerbie
Not true if they report falsely Mitz, lies are lies.
|
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 7872016)
Not true if they report falsely Mitz, lies are lies.
So the solicitors that prepared the case that the Scots authorities did a deal with to stop becoming public are all lying, as are the witnesses and everyone involved. So anything anyone says that you disagree with is lies :lol: Not much point in continuing the discussion really :rofl: |
Re: Lockerbie
Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
(Post 7872023)
Give me a break
So the solicitors that prepared the case that the Scots authorities did a deal with to stop becoming public are all lying, as are the witnesses and everyone involved. So anything anyone says that you disagree with is lies :lol: Not much point in continuing the discussion really :rofl: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:09 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.