Licensed to .... 'smoke'
#1
Licensed to .... 'smoke'
Another idea from the UK nanny state. A Health watchdog group has come up with the idea that you should be licensed to smoke, you would have to be over 18, and have an ID card with photo, which you would have to produce to buy cigarettes etc. If you were seen smoking by the police, then they would have the right to ask for your license. No license, cigareets would be confiscated, this would particularly apply to young people seen smoking.
#2
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
Another idea from the UK nanny state. A Health watchdog group has come up with the idea that you should be licensed to smoke, you would have to be over 18, and have an ID card with photo, which you would have to produce to buy cigarettes etc. If you were seen smoking by the police, then they would have the right to ask for your license. No license, cigareets would be confiscated, this would particularly apply to young people seen smoking.
#3
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
I know, I heard this yesterday as well, what a load of cobblers. These government thinktanks drive me pippy with all these ill conceived ideas. If smoking is such a major health issue (which I don't doubt it is) they should ban cigarettes entirely. But then where do they get the lost revenue from.
They will just tax us on sommat else - like the air we breathe coz they know we need that bunch of muppets they are xxx
#4
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: España
Posts: 728
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
And in other news, it has become clear that oral language examinations are too 'stressful' for students and should be dropped.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
#5
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
And in other news, it has become clear that oral language examinations are too 'stressful' for students and should be dropped.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
#6
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,281
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
And in other news, it has become clear that oral language examinations are too 'stressful' for students and should be dropped.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
Stressful? They dont know the bloody meaning of the word, oh to be a student again :curse:
#7
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
No sorry students arnt entitled to have any basic human rights - i'll be out of a job
#10
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
Oral has been abolished for students? What a bummer!
Back in my day, oral only got abolished when the wedding ring went on their finger!
Back in my day, oral only got abolished when the wedding ring went on their finger!
#11
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
And in other news, it has become clear that oral language examinations are too 'stressful' for students and should be dropped.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7249090.stm
Pretty soon, they'll realise that examinations, and possibly even school itself, are actually against our basic human rights... and instead they should just give everyone a licence to smoke at 3 years old an be done with it
Then the youngster will speak English, and any other language they may be learning, like here. We understand that the Spanish have English classes in the curriculum. The problem is they do not do any oral work because of this they pronounce words the same way as Spanish. i.e. they say all the letters.
#13
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,273
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
It would be a lot better if they brought out a licensed to breed law. Anyone caught pushing a pram without the exam pass certificate should have the kid confiscated.
#14
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: España
Posts: 728
Re: Licensed to .... 'smoke'
Just think of all the human rights you'd violate if you tried to bring that one in! The right to procreate after the excessive consumption of popular alcoholic beverages. The right to weaken the Darwinian gene pool. The right to claim benefits. The right to appear on Jeremy Kyle...