![]() |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10397779)
The strike is over, the workers are on double shifts to clear up the backlog and the burning has stopped.
Urbaser will probably just not fill vacant posts and let the number of staff run down gradually rather than sacking 125 workers - so the people of Jerez will suffer in the long run because there will be a reduction in service. this should mean the main elements of refuse collection should remain the same, its the extras that will go by the board. Outsourcing can sometimes work, and makes the councils look "lean and mean" but really all they are doing is transferring the admin etc onto another organisation, it still has to be paid for, some members of the public refusing to understand this doesn't help. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10396839)
We have a couple of huge warehouse type Ferreterias close by that opened up just before the crisis.
I was in both this week, the shelves were half empty, the staff were miserable and appeared almost suicidal, from what I could see of then that is. Half the lights had been shut down altogether, the others were so dim I could hardly see a damned thing. If I go back in next week I'll be taking a flashlight with me to help find what I'm looking for. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10397808)
but it will be orchestrated by the council reducing the amount they will pay for the work.
this should mean the main elements of refuse collection should remain the same, its the extras that will go by the board. Outsourcing can sometimes work, and makes the councils look "lean and mean" but really all they are doing is transferring the admin etc onto another organisation, it still has to be paid for, some members of the public refusing to understand this doesn't help. ` So in future in order to restore their profitability they will not replace people who leave, and cut the level of service to the bare bones of their contract. At least their employees are getting paid though, there are some places where dustmen are employed directly by the council and they haven't been paid for months! |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10396841)
Loving the support for Thatcher!
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by TheArmChairDetective
(Post 10398190)
I believe she has quite a lot of support, not everyone looks at Politics with one eye closed.
She came along just when desperately needed, when the unions were trying to overthrow the democratically elected govt. The country stupidly failed to back Heath when he made a similar stand in the 70s and paid for it, but little doubt people had decided enough was enough by the time Maggie came along. She was the only one with the balls to bring the country back into the real world and did a great job during her first term of straightening out the main problems. Just a shame she lost the plot during her second term, became a tad dictatorial and totally ignored any well meaning good advice from the rest of her own party. Apologies for losing the plot myself :lol:,supposed to be about Jerez innit ? Anyway good to see things are turning around and they're getting the place cleaned up. Must have been down to all the bad press from B.E. :cool: |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by TheArmChairDetective
(Post 10398190)
I believe she has quite a lot of support, not everyone looks at Politics with one eye closed.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10398223)
Lots of support. Cometh the hour, cometh the Iron Lady.
She came along just when desperately needed, when the unions were trying to overthrow the democratically elected govt. The country stupidly failed to back Heath when he made a similar stand in the 70s and paid for it, but little doubt people had decided enough was enough by the time Maggie came along. She was the only one with the balls to bring the country back into the real world and did a great job during her first term of straightening out the main problems. Just a shame she lost the plot during her second term, became a tad dictatorial and totally ignored any well meaning good advice from the rest of her own party. Apologies for losing the plot myself :lol:,supposed to be about Jerez innit ? Anyway good to see things are turning around and they're getting the place cleaned up. Must have been down to all the bad press from B.E. :cool: Heath asked the nation "Who runs this country - the Government or the Unions" and the nation said the latter. After that he was very much a broken politician, having lost such a vote in an General Election. Thatcher vowed she would never give in to the unions. Yes, it was bloody, but at the end of the day she stuck to her guns and refused to give in. That broke the unions, who yes lost many members due to redundancies, but considering they were in jobs that weren't needed, down pits that were not economically viable, feeding poor quality metals into steel plants that we should have bombed at the same time as we did the Ruhr. But from that came a realisation that the unions were actually keeping the country lagging behind the rest of the world with bad practices and overmanning. I repeat, under Thatcher we had a period where the unemployable were in jobs. Bliar/Blown just did what the unions wanted, sucked up to them, not for the good of the country but for the good of the Labour party. Spent all the money so that when they left office they could leave notes saying "There's nothing left in the kitty" And all Jerez is is what we saw 30 years ago, just Spain hasnt had the freedom to express itself under the Iron General. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10398392)
totally agree.
Heath asked the nation "Who runs this country - the Government or the Unions" and the nation said the latter. After that he was very much a broken politician, having lost such a vote in an General Election. Thatcher vowed she would never give in to the unions. Yes, it was bloody, but at the end of the day she stuck to her guns and refused to give in. That broke the unions, who yes lost many members due to redundancies, but considering they were in jobs that weren't needed, down pits that were not economically viable, feeding poor quality metals into steel plants that we should have bombed at the same time as we did the Ruhr. But from that came a realisation that the unions were actually keeping the country lagging behind the rest of the world with bad practices and overmanning. I repeat, under Thatcher we had a period where the unemployable were in jobs. Bliar/Blown just did what the unions wanted, sucked up to them, not for the good of the country but for the good of the Labour party. Spent all the money so that when they left office they could leave notes saying "There's nothing left in the kitty" And all Jerez is is what we saw 30 years ago, just Spain hasnt had the freedom to express itself under the Iron General. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10398232)
Fancy telling me what she did that was SO right?
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10398883)
She emasculated the unions and she put a stop to the disgusting practice of sending good men underground to extract worthless coal.
She led the way to the now recognised disaster of our utility companies owned by foreign corporations and essentially unaccountable here in the UK. You only have to look at what nPower have announced in the last 24 hours, that despite the ombudsmen and government looking into the excessive and complicit price hikes, they will raise their prices for their poorest customers by 9%, on top of last years huge hike. I don't doubt that Twatcher brought an end to the shambles that came before her, she brought a certain stability to British Politics but to sit and claim there was zero unemployment and to rose tint her terms is utter tosh! Have we forgotten that unemployment hit 4 million? If she did so much good how on earth did that happen? |
Re: Jerez is burning
The mass unemployment regarded by Thatcher as "a price worth paying" as she famously said is what gave birth to today's benefit dependency culture, as in many areas outside the prosperous South East of England, since heavy industry all but disappeared, it became the norm for no adults in a household to be in work, which continued from generation to generation. Once something becomes the norm, there ceases to be any stigma attached to it.
It was during those times that moving unemployed people on to long term sickness benefit in order to disguise the true extent of employment first became official Government policy. Why are we surprised at disability benefit fraud today when this was actively promoted by Thatcher and her successors? It is not only privatisation of the utilities that has proved disastrous and very costly for the consumer (and now details are emerging about how the private utility companies have manipulated the setting of wholesale gas prices, much like the banks did the LIBOR rate). What effect did contracting out services like hospital cleaning and sterile supply services have? Has privatising care homes for the elderly resulted in people receiving better care for lower prices? Has it hell as like. Railtrack - cutting corners on safety in order to keep costs down was found to be the cause of more than one rail disaster and led to the ultimate downfall of the company. And then the shareholders thought they should be compensated from public funds!!!! Selling off council houses - very popular at the time and a vote winner for Thatcher. But that is what has led to today's situation of the taxpayer subsidising inflated rents paid to private landlords who have done very nicely out of what used to be the social housing sector. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Although I think we should return to the jerez issue, I just have to say I am always absolutely amazed at how some people seem to have such a blinkered view of the Thatcher Years. Oh, I'm sure that many of the upper echelons did very well out of it, but in general the working man suffered badly. You could argue of course that it's still happening. I seem to remember that she deemed it necessary to deregulate the financial sector. Good move eh, leaving the financial sector to run riot unfettered.
I lived through it as well. I remember the nations discontent. I remember the high unemployment, interest rates and the recession, I remember her political life being saved once her popularity had waned, by the small matter of a small war. I thank Pocaloca for illustrating that the impression that employment was low at that time is a complete fallacy. Just not true! The working class suffered badly and anyone who thinks that NOT having unions to protect them (especially in this day and age) is deluding themselves. So .... one of the least popular leaders of all time, and even within her party who eventually threw her out themselves to save the government :);) |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10398232)
Fancy telling me what she did that was SO right?
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by TheArmChairDetective
(Post 10399022)
Maybe it needed to be pointed out! I wonder if a person of a similar character will come along to save Jerez? I do hope so.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10399044)
I've been to Jerez, why would you wish something so cruel on them?
Me too. I would hope the rubbish has been taken care of when I eventually return. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10396018)
Well, the strike may be over, they came to an agreement last night not to sack the 125 workers but instead everyone will have to accept a 10% pay cut. The employees are voting on it this afternoon. Given they have just lost three weeks pay during the strike, you can imagine what a happy Christmas they and their families will be having.
What was the rubbish strike about in the UK, can anyone remember? Not just rubbish uncolected, cemetary gates locked, grave diggers on strike, corpses piled up. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by campomutt
(Post 10399153)
Winter of Discontent....unions threatened to bring the country to its knees.
Not just rubbish uncolected, cemetary gates locked, grave diggers on strike, corpses piled up. Only 80 gravediggers were on strike in Liverpool and Tameside, Greater Manchester, in January 1979 and the 150 bodies were stored in a factory, but your "corpses piled up" sounds much better. A few militant gravediggers "up north" hardly bothered the rest of the country. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Lorry drivers and dock workers blockading ports and roads. No sugar, no loo rolls! Many staples such as tea and coffee effectively rationed.
No petrol - the delivery drivers were on strike-- Queuing for hours to fill the car. Rail drivers striking Tuesdays and Thursdays which meant the rolling stock was in the wrong place Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and most of Friday. So effectively no trains. So we tried driving but there was often no petrol and roads so jammed I had to leave home at 4 in the morning, and got home at 10 or 11 at night. So I started sleeping on the office floor, weeks at a time. As did thousands of others. Ambulance workers on strike and when I took my mother to hospital myself, she was left on a trolley for 48 hours because the porters were on a go slow. Mind you she had plenty of company! The country bankrupt and dependent on funding from the IMF. It is often said that if you can remember the 60s you weren't there. That certainly seems to be the case with the 70s. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10398934)
The mass unemployment regarded by Thatcher as "a price worth paying" as she famously said is what gave birth to today's benefit dependency culture, as in many areas outside the prosperous South East of England, since heavy industry all but disappeared, it became the norm for no adults in a household to be in work, which continued from generation to generation. Once something becomes the norm, there ceases to be any stigma attached to it.
It was during those times that moving unemployed people on to long term sickness benefit in order to disguise the true extent of employment first became official Government policy. Why are we surprised at disability benefit fraud today when this was actively promoted by Thatcher and her successors? It is not only privatisation of the utilities that has proved disastrous and very costly for the consumer (and now details are emerging about how the private utility companies have manipulated the setting of wholesale gas prices, much like the banks did the LIBOR rate). What effect did contracting out services like hospital cleaning and sterile supply services have? Has privatising care homes for the elderly resulted in people receiving better care for lower prices? Has it hell as like. Railtrack - cutting corners on safety in order to keep costs down was found to be the cause of more than one rail disaster and led to the ultimate downfall of the company. And then the shareholders thought they should be compensated from public funds!!!! Selling off council houses - very popular at the time and a vote winner for Thatcher. But that is what has led to today's situation of the taxpayer subsidising inflated rents paid to private landlords who have done very nicely out of what used to be the social housing sector. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 10398892)
To be fair it wasn't worthless coal at all and while I agree she broke the union power and led to a change in union practices some might say she made it easier to bring in cheaper coal which ultimately led to our coal no longer being economically viable and the pits being capped.
She led the way to the now recognised disaster of our utility companies owned by foreign corporations and essentially unaccountable here in the UK. You only have to look at what nPower have announced in the last 24 hours, that despite the ombudsmen and government looking into the excessive and complicit price hikes, they will raise their prices for their poorest customers by 9%, on top of last years huge hike. I don't doubt that Twatcher brought an end to the shambles that came before her, she brought a certain stability to British Politics but to sit and claim there was zero unemployment and to rose tint her terms is utter tosh! Have we forgotten that unemployment hit 4 million? If she did so much good how on earth did that happen? |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10398883)
She emasculated the unions and she put a stop to the disgusting practice of sending good men underground to extract worthless coal.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10398392)
totally agree.
Heath asked the nation "Who runs this country - the Government or the Unions" and the nation said the latter. After that he was very much a broken politician, having lost such a vote in an General Election. Thatcher vowed she would never give in to the unions. Yes, it was bloody, but at the end of the day she stuck to her guns and refused to give in. That broke the unions, who yes lost many members due to redundancies, but considering they were in jobs that weren't needed, down pits that were not economically viable, feeding poor quality metals into steel plants that we should have bombed at the same time as we did the Ruhr. But from that came a realisation that the unions were actually keeping the country lagging behind the rest of the world with bad practices and overmanning. I repeat, under Thatcher we had a period where the unemployable were in jobs. Bliar/Blown just did what the unions wanted, sucked up to them, not for the good of the country but for the good of the Labour party. Spent all the money so that when they left office they could leave notes saying "There's nothing left in the kitty" And all Jerez is is what we saw 30 years ago, just Spain hasnt had the freedom to express itself under the Iron General. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Well no-one has said she got everything right but she certainly sorted out the festering pustule that was Britain in the '70s. Another thing she got right was killing off Old Labour. The fact that this gave rise to Bliar's New Labour was an unfortunate consequence.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Chiclanagir
(Post 10399315)
Oh yes Maggie did a grand job breaking the Unions.
As far as the rest of the unions are concerned, I seem to remember that only a couple of months ago the tanker drivers only had to hint that they MIGHT go on strike to spark a bout of panic buying that led to such ridiculous situations as people trying to fill jam jars in the boot of their car with petrol. I've read the Colonel Blimp types on this forum complaining only this summer about the rail unions holding the country to ransom by threatening to strike during the Olympics. Likewise about the public sector unions such as the Border Force staff striking. They don't sound exactly moribund to me, although numbers have certainly declined since the 1980s. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10399330)
And when you really think about it, did she really even do that? IMO, the NUM did more to defeat themselves, with the idiotic leadership and tactics adopted by Scargill (I hate that man nearly as much as I hate Thatcher) and the willingness of the UDM to break the strike because they thought it would save their own jobs. Well, they found out in short order how much any assurances they might have been given on that score were worth.
As far as the rest of the unions are concerned, I seem to remember that only a couple of months ago the tanker drivers only had to hint that they MIGHT go on strike to spark a bout of panic buying that led to such ridiculous situations as people trying to fill jam jars in the boot of their car with petrol. I've read the Colonel Blimp types on this forum complaining only this summer about the rail unions holding the country to ransom by threatening to strike during the Olympics. Likewise about the public sector unions such as the Border Force staff striking. They don't sound exactly moribund to me, although numbers have certainly declined since the 1980s. Unfortunately public opinion was very much divided when Heath made his last stand in the 70s. Even that was bit late in the day, because the rot had already set well in back in the 60s, when such as the car workers were repeatedly downing tools at the drop of a hat, not having enough sense to see that they were shooting themselves in the foot and playing a major part in handing over their industry on a plate to the Japanese. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 10399277)
Lorry drivers and dock workers blockading ports and roads. No sugar, no loo rolls! Many staples such as tea and coffee effectively rationed.
No petrol - the delivery drivers were on strike-- Queuing for hours to fill the car. Rail drivers striking Tuesdays and Thursdays which meant the rolling stock was in the wrong place Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and most of Friday. So effectively no trains. So we tried driving but there was often no petrol and roads so jammed I had to leave home at 4 in the morning, and got home at 10 or 11 at night. So I started sleeping on the office floor, weeks at a time. As did thousands of others. Ambulance workers on strike and when I took my mother to hospital myself, she was left on a trolley for 48 hours because the porters were on a go slow. Mind you she had plenty of company! The country bankrupt and dependent on funding from the IMF. It is often said that if you can remember the 60s you weren't there. That certainly seems to be the case with the 70s. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Chiclanagir
(Post 10399306)
Thereby putting those good men on the dole and their sons after them. I am sure all those Welsh miners would thank you for that thought.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by agoreira
(Post 10399613)
In those times I wasn't working in any of the industrial heartlands or big cities, nor did I use rail transport or have to visit hospital, but I can't remember experiencing any of the other things like no loo rolls, sugar, coffee, tea, petrol etc. I just read out part of your post to my wife and asked if she could remember these things, just in case I'd lost my memory. Like me, she says she can't remember any of those things.:confused: Not saying it didn't happen where you were, but not where we were living.
Buying a gas hob for the first house I bought (although it already had an electric stove) so that we would be able to cook something if the electricity were off, and could use the electricity if the gas were off. And everybody I know still does that to this very day - just in case. We had to buy and install a standby generator to put on the office roof (not easy to afford with so many companies on the brink of collapse) so that we could keep the ancient switchboard running and some form of power to keep the lights and heating on with all of us sleeping on floors. I think the intention was to bring the cities to their knees. I remember during one of the strikes the office boy (18 years old and a real East Ender) not turning up till lunchtime on a Monday. Given how close we were to going out of business (we were an import export company with blockaded goods rotting in the docks), he was about to be sacked when we found out he had taken his dad's car or van across on the ferry, loaded up with loo rolls or sugar, and sold them around his neighbourhood at a considerable profit. Later wound up running the trading division of one of the larger merchants. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by bigglesworth
(Post 10400120)
Memory does play tricks, but all I remember is the unending misery of years and years of railway and power strikes. Hours standing on freezing platforms not knowing when or if a train might turn up, or if it did, whether it would actually go to its destination or stop half way. Begging floor space from friends when the last train did not materialise.. Sleeping at the station a few times, freezing all the time. Until they closed the stations.
Buying a gas hob for the first house I bought (although it already had an electric stove) so that we would be able to cook something if the electricity were off, and could use the electricity if the gas were off. And everybody I know still does that to this very day - just in case. We had to buy and install a standby generator to put on the office roof (not easy to afford with so many companies on the brink of collapse) so that we could keep the ancient switchboard running and some form of power to keep the lights and heating on with all of us sleeping on floors. I think the intention was to bring the cities to their knees. I remember during one of the strikes the office boy (18 years old and a real East Ender) not turning up till lunchtime on a Monday. Given how close we were to going out of business (we were an import export company with blockaded goods rotting in the docks), he was about to be sacked when we found out he had taken his dad's car or van across on the ferry, loaded up with loo rolls or sugar, and sold them around his neighbourhood at a considerable profit. Later wound up running the trading division of one of the larger merchants. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Chiclanagir
(Post 10399306)
Thereby putting those good men on the dole and their sons after them. I am sure all those Welsh miners would thank you for that thought.
Originally Posted by TheArmChairDetective
(Post 10399620)
So if you had a business frying eggs, and you employed 50 people to fry one egg a day but only had 10 eggs left with no more eggs being laid, would you carry on paying everyone on the grounds that you wanted to employ their sons to fry eggs that you will never have?
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10400134)
Yes - it seems people think that the mining industry (and others) should have been some sort of charity. For balance I would say that more should have been done to provide alternative employment in the worst hit areas.
even the miners dying of coal related diseases were shafted by their unions and the firm of solicitors they had to use, losing up to 40% of their payouts, some never lived long enough to receive it because unions and solicitors dragged things out. for how long do you keep sending men down into the depths to scrabble for coal that isnt worth bringing to the surface, that costs more and more every inch they go underground, not just financially but in the cost to the people themselves. If there was so much "good coal" down there surely someone with modern technology would have had it out by now. and how much did Scargill take from the Russian miners union to feather his own nest, money that was paid over to support the UK's miners.?? ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10400134)
Yes - it seems people think that the mining industry (and others) should have been some sort of charity.
http://www.libremercado.com/2012-07-...lo-1276463068/ |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 10400134)
Yes - it seems people think that the mining industry (and others) should have been some sort of charity. For balance I would say that more should have been done to provide alternative employment in the worst hit areas.
|
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10400202)
£millions was pumped in but misspent by union bosses and their friends, some was spent for the good of the community but far more was wasted or ended up in the usual Spanish practice - back pockets and brown envelopes.
even the miners dying of coal related diseases were shafted by their unions and the firm of solicitors they had to use, losing up to 40% of their payouts, some never lived long enough to receive it because unions and solicitors dragged things out. for how long do you keep sending men down into the depths to scrabble for coal that isnt worth bringing to the surface, that costs more and more every inch they go underground, not just financially but in the cost to the people themselves. If there was so much "good coal" down there surely someone with modern technology would have had it out by now. and how much did Scargill take from the Russian miners union to feather his own nest, money that was paid over to support the UK's miners.?? ` The ones I know from my own area are honest enough to admit it. Some took a few years to get back into work again, but with the sort of redundancy payments they received they could afford to, that's if they hadn't stupidly blown it on a bar in Spain, which quite a few of them did. I once visited an NUM annual conferance as a guest. They used to throw members contributions around like confetti. As much booze as they could drink, as many women as they wanted and a special all-in treat for a party of visiting Russian Miners Union reps. A far cry from the Siberian Salt mines. :cool: |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 10400570)
At the end of the day the miners were much better out of it.
The ones I know from my own area are honest enough to admit it. Some took a few years to get back into work again, but with the sort of redundancy payments they received they could afford to, that's if they hadn't stupidly blown it on a bar in Spain, which quite a few of them did. I once visited an NUM annual conferance as a guest. They used to throw members contributions around like confetti. As much booze as they could drink, as many women as they wanted and a special all-in treat for a party of visiting Russian Miners Union reps. A far cry from the Siberian Salt mines. :cool: yes, there were horror stories, grandfather and his relatives were all down the mines as well, but generally all lived to well past their 60's and one or two into their 80's. I am not saying they had a medically fit lifestyle but they were around to play with children and grandchildren. ` |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10400600)
my paternal family were miners, my father's 5 elder brothers told him he wasnt to work down the pit where they and father were, when he protested they told him he had to find something else to do, if he took one step on the site they would physically throw him out.
yes, there were horror stories, grandfather and his relatives were all down the mines as well, but generally all lived to well past their 60's and one or two into their 80's. I am not saying they had a medically fit lifestyle but they were around to play with children and grandchildren. ` I indirectly saw plenty of the dark side of it and this sad ballad is very apt. Working Man" It's a working man I am And I've been down underground And I swear to God If I ever see the sun Oh for any length of time I can hold it in my mind I never again Will go down underground At the age of sixteen years Oh he quarrels with his peers He vowed they'd never See another one In the dark recess of the mine Where you age before your time And the coal dust lies heavy On your lungs It's a working man I am And I've been down underground And I swear to God If I ever see the sun Oh for any length of time I can hold it in my mind I never again Will go down underground At the age of sixty four He will greet you at the door And he will gently lead you By the arm Through the dark recess of the mine He will take you back in time And he'll tell you of The hardships that were had It's a working man I am And I've been down underground And I swear to God If I ever see the sun Oh for any length of time I can hold it in my mind I never again will go down underground I never again will go down underground |
Re: Jerez is burning
:starsmile:
:goodpost: |
Re: Jerez is burning
Funny how we've gone from burning rubbish to burning coal!
But there are still miners working in horrible unsafe conditions all over the world, like the ones in S Africa who got shot when they went on strike, or the ones in Chile who were buried underground. You'd think in this day and age they could get machines to do this sort of work? |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10400666)
Funny how we've gone from burning rubbish to burning coal!
But there are still miners working in horrible unsafe conditions all over the world, like the ones in S Africa who got shot when they went on strike, or the ones in Chile who were buried underground. You'd think in this day and age they could get machines to do this sort of work? In addition there are many variable factors and problems continually occuring, that can only be sorted out by guys being down there at the sharp end in the filth and foul air at the coal face. |
Re: Jerez is burning
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10400666)
Funny how we've gone from burning rubbish to burning coal!
But there are still miners working in horrible unsafe conditions all over the world, like the ones in S Africa who got shot when they went on strike, or the ones in Chile who were buried underground. You'd think in this day and age they could get machines to do this sort of work? we have gone from Jerez to Thatcher to Mineworkers, its so easy in BES mining machines have to have a man to operate them, they are not yet fully automatic and can't tell when the seam alters course. that is why all the cries about the amount of coal left in closed UK mines falls on deaf ears. and I know I wouldn't want to travel 5miles out under the North Sea to a coal face, where the water dripping in is pure North Sea. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:38 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.