![]() |
Re: Having a baby!
Thanks for the replies! And good luck with your nationality applications chopera.
Indeed, having been together 8 years and expecting a planned child together, we're considerably more committed to one another than many married couples I know! It's just that neither of us sees the need for a piece of paper to demonstrate that commitment. |
Re: Having a baby!
A marriage certificate is NOT just a piece of paper, as many unmarrieds are so fond of saying. Legalities, rights are involved here!
|
Re: Having a baby!
Hence my original question!
|
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by cricketman
(Post 10789465)
This doesnt have to be done by the father - and there is no need to register them at the British consulate, unless you want your child to have a British passport.
My little boy has a Spanish passport, makes sense if he is living and growing up in Spain, and given that he and his mum are Spanish. Btw, I would always advocate talking to lawyers, not notaries, notaries are just paper pushers with little knowledge of the law And you don't HAVE to register at the British Consulate, but it's oh, so useful when the children would like British Passports for future travel. Some visas are cheaper with British Passports than with their French ones.... My OH is French, by the way and is happy for his daughters to be dual-nationality.... I said Notary, as, in France, they are the ones to deal with Wills and all Inheritance questions. Avocats (lawyers) aren't competent for this... But then I live in France and just thought that the procedures would be the same in Spain.... |
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by 82mph
(Post 10789857)
Hence my original question!
For example, we found out that in the US, even though we are married, because we were not citizens, if one of us died, the other would not get the tax free transfer of assets which US married citizens (just like UK citizens in the UK) would receive. The remaining spouse would be taxed on the assets prior to receiving them. We had to establish a trust so that the remaining spouse would not get taxed immediately. You may find that in Spain since you are not married, inheritance tax would be liable for the remaining spouse; property in your partner's name would not automatically revert to you etc etc; even that the grandparents might have rights to the child you had never thought of. |
Re: Having a baby!
In Spain,even if you are married you are liable for IHT on your spouses half, and property does not automatically revert to you, even if you have made a Spanish will.
I have also heard that the Spanish tax office does not recognise trusts. |
Re: Having a baby!
"Having a child together isn't commitment, it's just one of the outcomes of having sex" -that little piece of paper which means tying yourselves together legally so that neither can walk away without redress - that does demonstrate commitment.
|
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by rspltd
(Post 10791940)
"Having a child together isn't commitment, it's just one of the outcomes of having sex" -that little piece of paper which means tying yourselves together legally so that neither can walk away without redress - that does demonstrate commitment.
I am married but only because it was a great chance for a party for the whole family, and so not to embarrass the traditional Spanish abuelos But I'm with the OP, having a child is the biggest committment one can make. And with child support agencies and the like these days, there is no running away from your responsibilities |
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by rspltd
(Post 10791940)
"Having a child together isn't commitment, it's just one of the outcomes of having sex" -that little piece of paper which means tying yourselves together legally so that neither can walk away without redress - that does demonstrate commitment.
|
Re: Having a baby!
" And with child support agencies and the like these days, there is no running away from your responsibilities"
and that is the reason that CSA's had to be set up because people were doing just that - running away and not offering their OH's the protection afforded by the Law through committing to marriage. |
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by rspltd
(Post 10792767)
" And with child support agencies and the like these days, there is no running away from your responsibilities"
and that is the reason that CSA's had to be set up because people were doing just that - running away and not offering their OH's the protection afforded by the Law through committing to marriage. |
Re: Having a baby!
The Child Support Agency (CSA) was formed in 1993 following the Child Support Act, 1991. It was set up as a 'Next Step' agency, and reports directly to the Department of Work and Pensions (formerly the Department of Social Security). Its purposes are basically four-fold; to trace the non-resident parent (NRP), to assess how much s/he should pay in maintenance, to provide a collection service if required and to enforce payment if necessary.
By the time 1992 arrived it was clear that the issue of child support was becoming a prominent issue as it had developed into a huge expenditure burden for the government. During Thatcher's era the child support bill had trebled to £6.6 billion, and thus was a massive and increasing tax burden for the country. The number of children born to unmarried mothers had risen to 31% by 1990 (10% in 1970), the number of lone parents claiming benefits had risen to 70% by 1989 (37% in 1971), yet the numbers receiving from the non-resident partner had dropped to 23% in 1989 (50% in 1979). |
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by rspltd
(Post 10792910)
The Child Support Agency (CSA) was formed in 1993 following the Child Support Act, 1991. It was set up as a 'Next Step' agency, and reports directly to the Department of Work and Pensions (formerly the Department of Social Security). Its purposes are basically four-fold; to trace the non-resident parent (NRP), to assess how much s/he should pay in maintenance, to provide a collection service if required and to enforce payment if necessary.
By the time 1992 arrived it was clear that the issue of child support was becoming a prominent issue as it had developed into a huge expenditure burden for the government. During Thatcher's era the child support bill had trebled to £6.6 billion, and thus was a massive and increasing tax burden for the country. The number of children born to unmarried mothers had risen to 31% by 1990 (10% in 1970), the number of lone parents claiming benefits had risen to 70% by 1989 (37% in 1971), yet the numbers receiving from the non-resident partner had dropped to 23% in 1989 (50% in 1979). |
Re: Having a baby!
Originally Posted by chopera
(Post 10792998)
and your point is?
|
Re: Having a baby!
No comment about Inheritance tax in Spain, not receiving your spouses half of the property / his money tax free, even it you are married, and a will has been made leaving his share to you.SanDiegogirl got her facts wrong. It's surprising how many expats get a shock on learning this, even with all the info about.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:17 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.