Going off grid (Iberdrolla) in Spain
#16
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 835











to go back to the OP question
No it is not rentable to produce your own power
but to reduce the electric bill look up if you can reduce the connected max power.
if it is more than 3.3 kw you can reduce it and save money this way.
my bill for 2 months with 0 consumption is 27 €
No it is not rentable to produce your own power
but to reduce the electric bill look up if you can reduce the connected max power.
if it is more than 3.3 kw you can reduce it and save money this way.
my bill for 2 months with 0 consumption is 27 €
#19
Banned










Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca











I question how it's somehow justifiable that people should be forced to live like third-world in the interest of assuring minimal competition and maximising profitability of the energy cartel...
OK, if you choose that path, that's your decision. But to be mandated, well, that's another horse...
OK, if you choose that path, that's your decision. But to be mandated, well, that's another horse...
#21
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 835











It would be fairly easy for me Fred they put new meters in the entrance hall a few weeks ago,and my ICP is in the apartment.It would mean "working live" though,and why anybody would risk their insurance being voided is beyond me.And God forbid anybody did it and it started an electrical fire which ended up in a fatality.
#22
Banned










Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca











We have one of those new digital meters that acts as the ICP They put it in when the old meter went bad. €240 in charges. Silly me, I thought the standing charges covered things like maintenance (like in the first world). But no, apparently, it's just free money for them.
Oddly enough, I still pay 10c per day "rental" of the (now wholly useless) ICP I purchased outright for almost €300 about 5 years ago.
One of the benefits of the whole ridiculous ICP fiasco, I reckon. They made a bundle installing them, and still make a bundle even after they're obsolete. Apparently, endesa is also in the currency exchange business (exchanging it from mine to theirs).
Damned good lobbyists, that bunch. Again, one would believe this ridiculous solar taxing scheme which puts wads of more free money into endesa's pocket would have about the same chance as an ice cube in hell. But maybe not... Damn good lobbyists, this bunch.
Oddly enough, I still pay 10c per day "rental" of the (now wholly useless) ICP I purchased outright for almost €300 about 5 years ago.
One of the benefits of the whole ridiculous ICP fiasco, I reckon. They made a bundle installing them, and still make a bundle even after they're obsolete. Apparently, endesa is also in the currency exchange business (exchanging it from mine to theirs).
Damned good lobbyists, that bunch. Again, one would believe this ridiculous solar taxing scheme which puts wads of more free money into endesa's pocket would have about the same chance as an ice cube in hell. But maybe not... Damn good lobbyists, this bunch.
#23
It would be fairly easy for me Fred they put new meters in the entrance hall a few weeks ago,and my ICP is in the apartment.It would mean "working live" though,and why anybody would risk their insurance being voided is beyond me.And God forbid anybody did it and it started an electrical fire which ended up in a fatality.
Presumably if the meters are "smart" they would already be measuring the current drawn so what you did after the meter would make no difference
#24
Banned










Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca











One would expect.....
... That if the objective is to create tariffs based on actual consumption...
... that actual consumption would be the metric by which the tariff would be determined...
But the ICP genius controls consumption not on the basis of consumption, but on the basis of the maximum drawn at any one second.., not what you consume...
... for example, you might normally use less than than 200 watts of power on the lowest tariff... But if you run the wash machine at the same time as the oven.. Whoosh! Shutdown. ...
That has nothing to do with average consumption. It has to do with what you use at any given moment, not what you actually consume, which places the burden in the consumer to avoid exceeding your contract at any given moment, not as a lifestyle...
So, if you simply want to use the oven at the same time you use the wash machine, you have to sign up for the higher tariff, or else you will be cut off. But you may never consume anywhere near the same amount as someone who irresponsibly leaves their lights on all the time...
If the goal were to set tariffs based on consumption, then it would be a simple computer algorithm to determine consumption based in meter readings. No need to charge consumers a fortune for a stupid, useless ICP that doesn't measure consumption at all.
Add to that the standing charges, charges for maintenance, charges for whatever... Not exactly "consumer friendly"... In fact, I am now convinced it's the last remaining government-complicit ripoff in Spain.
... That if the objective is to create tariffs based on actual consumption...
... that actual consumption would be the metric by which the tariff would be determined...
But the ICP genius controls consumption not on the basis of consumption, but on the basis of the maximum drawn at any one second.., not what you consume...
... for example, you might normally use less than than 200 watts of power on the lowest tariff... But if you run the wash machine at the same time as the oven.. Whoosh! Shutdown. ...
That has nothing to do with average consumption. It has to do with what you use at any given moment, not what you actually consume, which places the burden in the consumer to avoid exceeding your contract at any given moment, not as a lifestyle...
So, if you simply want to use the oven at the same time you use the wash machine, you have to sign up for the higher tariff, or else you will be cut off. But you may never consume anywhere near the same amount as someone who irresponsibly leaves their lights on all the time...
If the goal were to set tariffs based on consumption, then it would be a simple computer algorithm to determine consumption based in meter readings. No need to charge consumers a fortune for a stupid, useless ICP that doesn't measure consumption at all.
Add to that the standing charges, charges for maintenance, charges for whatever... Not exactly "consumer friendly"... In fact, I am now convinced it's the last remaining government-complicit ripoff in Spain.
Last edited by amideislas; Oct 31st 2015 at 11:37 am.
#25
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 835











.My apartment was built in the 60's so the wiring is although in good condition only really safe to handle 10 amps max,so I'm more than happy to leave the situation as is.
#26
I suppose it would depend on how smart they are, how they are calibrated,and how well they are monitored.If it's to the usual Valencian standards
.My apartment was built in the 60's so the wiring is although in good condition only really safe to handle 10 amps max,so I'm more than happy to leave the situation as is.
.My apartment was built in the 60's so the wiring is although in good condition only really safe to handle 10 amps max,so I'm more than happy to leave the situation as is.Indeed Dave, I'm very familiar with the Valencian standards, it would appear one of the common requirements for electricians was to be colour blind
#27
It would be fairly easy for me Fred they put new meters in the entrance hall a few weeks ago,and my ICP is in the apartment.It would mean "working live" though,and why anybody would risk their insurance being voided is beyond me.And God forbid anybody did it and it started an electrical fire which ended up in a fatality.
#28
Even though I have a 10.3 KW three phase supply when we had a house full (8) last week last week the visitors still managed to trip the ICP at the first breakfast! Interesting it is always the internal ICP that trips!
#29
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 835











Anyway now it looks like I have double cover!




