![]() |
GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Gadaffi is dead .on sky news today..
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Excellent. I rather liked the fact that he was found cowering like a rat in an actual drainpipe.
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9686390)
Excellent. I rather liked the fact that he was found cowering like a rat in an actual drainpipe.
Jim |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Guess no one yelled "Gaddaffi duck"
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Bigger Jim
(Post 9686452)
Was not the purpose of Nato getting involved to ensure that Gadaffi received a fair trial?
Jim Gadaffi was given many opportunities to recieve a fair trial but chose not to. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Bigger Jim
(Post 9686452)
Was not the purpose of Nato getting involved to ensure that Gadaffi received a fair trial?
Jim |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by twistedmelon
(Post 9686474)
NATO got involved for the usual reasons OIL.
Gadaffi was given many opportunities to recieve a fair trial but chose not to. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by twistedmelon
(Post 9686474)
NATO got involved for the usual reasons OIL.
Gadaffi was given many opportunities to recieve a fair trial but chose not to. Jim |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Bigger Jim
(Post 9686625)
Maybe he wasn't too far from the truth in rejecting them after all he never got one!!
Jim |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
You people really have learned nothing from Iraq have you :thumbdown:
Come on then let's hear where would you like to invade next? As the middle east warzone spreads, the chances somebody you each know & love will become a casualty, then we'll see how much you support America's quest for world domination! |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by twistedmelon
(Post 9686474)
NATO got involved for the usual reasons OIL.
Gadaffi was given many opportunities to recieve a fair trial but chose not to. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
:)A 'fair trial' would have been too embarassing for all concerned. There is no way he could have been allowed to survive.
ciao for now, 'o nonno |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Question being now of course is this present rag tag army of inexperienced folk can keep a nation of tribes together.
The future will tell if the demise of Gadaffi was in the best interests of Libya or not. Some very uncertain times ahead. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9687216)
You people really have learned nothing from Iraq have you :thumbdown:
Come on then let's hear where would you like to invade next? As the middle east warzone spreads, the chances somebody you each know & love will become a casualty, |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9686390)
Excellent. I rather liked the fact that he was found cowering like a rat in an actual drainpipe.
Just wondering which side of the fence you're on regarding this heinous crime,bil. ;) |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 9687454)
It seems that your Human Rights pals are not very happy about the way he died and are demanding an investigation.
Just wondering which side of the fence you're on regarding this heinous crime,bil. ;) Aren't you one of the people who decrys the human rights and demands common sense? Shooting a rat in a drain makes perfect sense. I gather his son is lying critically ill in hospital. Were I the doctor, I'd take one look, and say "Leave this one to die, there's an ingrowing toenail in the next bed that needs dealing with." |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Just how much better the new regeme will be or in fact if they are any better we shall see.
Also if Libya will remain unified as a nation. Nato supported a rather unknown factor rather similar to the regeme in power in Afghanistan in that it has limited support outside of its tribal following. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9687216)
You people really have learned nothing from Iraq have you :thumbdown:
Come on then let's hear where would you like to invade next? As the middle east warzone spreads, the chances somebody you each know & love will become a casualty, then we'll see how much you support America's quest for world domination! I learned that the 'Great and the good' who tell us to be honest and pay our taxes, are benefit thieves who lie to Parliament with impunity, that the opposition were too gutless to even challenge the Lies about WMDs. I have learned that the Yanks are desperate to run away from Afghanistan before the Taliban throw them out just like they had their arrogant pasty arses kicked out of Vietnam. I can hear them shouting "Run away, run away!" from here. As for Libya? Ghaddafi was torturing and butchering his own people, gunning them down if they dared to protest about it. Here at least we can see the evidence with our own eyes, and had we done nothing, then frankly the UN might as well be disbanded. There were no WMDs in Iraq, Saddam was doing what he was told, and we were dragged into that by lying dishonest scum Americans who treat us like fools, and a lying weasel of a prime Minister who spent all his spare time praying and licking Bush's arse. Is that enough difference for you? |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9687513)
What have I learned from Iraq? I learned that the Yanks and the UK warmongers are way too stupid to learn from history, and way too arrogant to think they needed to deal with one, legitimate struggle with Afghanistan before they picked an illegitimate one with Iraq.
I learned that the 'Great and the good' who tell us to be honest and pay our taxes, are benefit thieves who lie to Parliament with impunity, that the opposition were too gutless to even challenge the Lies about WMDs. I have learned that the Yanks are desperate to run away from Afghanistan before the Taliban throw them out just like they had their arrogant pasty arses kicked out of Vietnam. I can hear them shouting "Run away, run away!" from here. As for Libya? Ghaddafi was torturing and butchering his own people, gunning them down if they dared to protest about it. Here at least we can see the evidence with our own eyes, and had we done nothing, then frankly the UN might as well be disbanded. There were no WMDs in Iraq, Saddam was doing what he was told, and we were dragged into that by lying dishonest scum Americans who treat us like fools, and a lying weasel of a prime Minister who spent all his spare time praying and licking Bush's arse. Is that enough difference for you? You talk about Gaddafi's treatment of his own people, wsn't the same said about Saddam? (Even though the Kurds were not his own people). It was only after he was removed from power, that it was publicly discovered just how bad Iraq was & that it needed ruling with an iron fist. Is the same not true of Libya? Is the civil war that we have created going to end overnight, or as with Iraq, will we still be discussing it in ten years time? |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
I watched the videos and photos and wasn't too shocked, but maybe a little saddened. It really brought home to me the belief that we're but a small step away from the savages we once were many thousands of years ago.
One photo showed the injured Gadaffa thrown into an ambulance and smiling rebels climbed aboard afterwards. When he emerged at the other end, he had been shot in the head from close range. Those smiling rebels are savages, if you choose to call them brave freedom fighters, you would be wrong. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9687524)
Can I ask why you consider Afghanistan to be a legitimate struggle? Check the date on this article http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/2017044.stm
You talk about Gaddafi's treatment of his own people, wsn't the same said about Saddam? (Even though the Kurds were not his own people). It was only after he was removed from power, that it was publicly discovered just how bad Iraq was & that it needed ruling with an iron fist. Is the same not true of Libya? Is the civil war that we have created going to end overnight, or as with Iraq, will we still be discussing it in ten years time? Re the quote, there is no level of corruption so great or so bad that it would surprise me, and if you could produce evidence to show me that the Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11 then I would change my openion as to its legitimacy. Even that wouldn't greatly surprise me. I have no faith in any government of any stripe. As for Saddam, he was under control, he had destroyed the WMDs. A war wasn't necessary, he could have been contained and extracted without creating the slaughter that we did. Iraq was TRASHED. Power stations, water treatment plants, every ministry that ran the country, the army was disbanded, the police effectively and the border guards. I don't think there was a single institution left capable of functioning. Except oil, possibly???? |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 9687547)
I watched the videos and photos and wasn't too shocked, but maybe a little saddened. It really brought home to me the belief that we're but a small step away from the savages we once were many thousands of years ago.
One photo showed the injured Gadaffa thrown into an ambulance and smiling rebels climbed aboard afterwards. When he emerged at the other end, he had been shot in the head from close range. Those smiling rebels are savages, if you choose to call them brave freedom fighters, you would be wrong. As I say, Gadaffi broke the law, spat on it and danced, laughing on the fragments. His end was exactly what he deserved, being shot like the vermin he was. For someone like him to then expect a fair and just treatment, especially from the people he abused for so long, is ludicrous. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
damn, this having an opinion and airing it thing is easier than I imagined
ditto to what bil said (see all of the above) oh by the way HBG you can probably substitute the words "a few hours" for the words "many thousands of years" technology to kill does not change the savage intent. Our minds and natural instincts are those of a hunter gatherer, our education fools us into believing we are different from cavemen, far too early in human evolution for this to change. Live a lie, the illusion is far better than the reality...I can recommend retail therapy or narcotics depending on preference |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Bigger Jim
(Post 9686452)
Was not the purpose of Nato getting involved to ensure that Gadaffi received a fair trial?
Jim That is what his "subjects" considered fair. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by EllisG
(Post 9687597)
oh by the way HBG you can probably substitute the words "a few hours" for the words "many thousands of years" technology to kill does not change the savage intent. Our minds and natural instincts are those of a hunter gatherer, our education fools us into believing we are different from cavemen, far too early in human evolution for this to change. Live a lie, the illusion is far better than the reality...I can recommend retail therapy or narcotics depending on preference
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Bigger Jim
(Post 9686452)
Was not the purpose of Nato getting involved to ensure that Gadaffi received a fair trial?
Jim Officially Gadaffi himself was not a target, nor capturing him the purpose of the action. However unofficially, I have little doubt what was quite understandably going through their minds during the course of the action, just as they appeared well satisfied with the end result. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 9687745)
As I understood it the purpose of NATO getting involved was to protect the civilian population from the actions of Gadaffis thugs and merceneries.
Officially Gadaffi himself was not a target, nor capturing him the purpose of the action. However unofficially, I have little doubt what was quite understandably going through their minds during the course of the action, just as they appeared well satisfied with the end result. Personally, I prefer seeing the harsher images. Helps people to realise the true impact of violence if they see some blood. Might put them off doing it themselves. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Gadaffi's death is to be applauded, but not the manner of it; that seems to be the informed opinion from the civilised world. Not surprisingly, the most graphic images in the British press appear in the Daily Mail, it is what their readership expect and thousands of them have added comments, often expressing their glee at the scenes.
If cavemen could read, that's the newspaper they would be gloating over. I was going to write that I didn't have the courage to look at the Sun, but then decided I did, but just looked at the headlines. That's For Lockerby is what they said, beside the face of a bloodied human head suffering during torture. Thank God most of us don't agree with such savagery. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9687565)
I consider it legit, if what we were told was true, and the Taliban there had initiated 9/11. Rooting them out would, IMO be justified.
Re the quote, there is no level of corruption so great or so bad that it would surprise me, and if you could produce evidence to show me that the Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11 then I would change my openion as to its legitimacy. Even that wouldn't greatly surprise me Kuwaiti born Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is linked with Al Qaeda but not the Taliban. Please remember that Taliban was the name of the Afghan government up until 2001. There were two reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan. The first was to build the worlds longest oil pipeline from Azerbaijan and Central Asia through Afghanistan to Pakistan & India. The second reason is in preparation for a two fronted war against Iran. The US now has bases either side of Iran & has wanted the war with Iran since the Shah was overthrown in 1979. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 9688017)
Gadaffi's death is to be applauded, but not the manner of it; that seems to be the informed opinion from the civilised world. Not surprisingly, the most graphic images in the British press appear in the Daily Mail, it is what their readership expect and thousands of them have added comments, often expressing their glee at the scenes.
If cavemen could read, that's the newspaper they would be gloating over. I was going to write that I didn't have the courage to look at the Sun, but then decided I did, but just looked at the headlines. That's For Lockerby is what they said, beside the face of a bloodied human head suffering during torture. Thank God most of us don't agree with such savagery. Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited, and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention. In particular, no prisoner of war may be subjected to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the prisoner concerned and carried out in his interest. Likewise, prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity. Measures of reprisal against prisoners of war are prohibited. Whether you agree with the savagery or not, whether you wanted to see him dead or not, it was a criminal act. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9687915)
Been watching the end of the rat on Spanish TV. You'd never see images like this on UK TV that's far too sanitised
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9688172)
Article 13 of the Geneva Convention
Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited, and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention. In particular, no prisoner of war may be subjected to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the prisoner concerned and carried out in his interest. Likewise, prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity. Measures of reprisal against prisoners of war are prohibited. Whether you agree with the savagery or not, whether you wanted to see him dead or not, it was a criminal act. When it comes down to the treatment of an individual soldier, or even the leader of an army, yeah, I agree proper treatment is a must. However, Gaddafi is such a shit, that I'm prepared to turn a blind eye. Tell you what. Get that scumbag blair up on war crimes, and Bush in the dock with him, get them convicted and I'll think about looking into Gaddafi's death. Right after hell freezes over. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9688154)
It's easy to prove that the Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11, how many people still think Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...military-trial
Kuwaiti born Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is linked with Al Qaeda but not the Taliban. Please remember that Taliban was the name of the Afghan government up until 2001. There were two reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan. The first was to build the worlds longest oil pipeline from Azerbaijan and Central Asia through Afghanistan to Pakistan & India. The second reason is in preparation for a two fronted war against Iran. The US now has bases either side of Iran & has wanted the war with Iran since the Shah was overthrown in 1979. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
What has Gaddafi ever done to you Bil? Have you ever had the opportunity to form a balanced viewpoint, or are you reiterating opinions of the media?
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9688213)
If the Yanks invaded Afghanistan in preparation for a war on Iran, then they are even more retarded than I thought.
|
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9688224)
What has Gaddafi ever done to you Bil? Have you ever had the opportunity to form a balanced viewpoint, or are you reiterating opinions of the media?
But wait! How will I be able to trust them? Is gaddafi lying when he says he is blameless? Perhaps the deaths were all fakes. Plus of course, Gaddafi has never done A SINGLE THING to me. I resolve to forgive him immediately, to retract all the negative things I have said about him, and dedicate the rest of my life to clearing his name and getting him cannonised by the pope, or if you your self are free, perhaps you could perform this august role? |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
If you are going to carry on producing weapons as many of those company's that contribute so many millions to the republican party do, pay again those millions to grease the wheels in congress etc etc etc. Then you really need a couple of good excuses to ............
1 Use the things up so you can of course make a lot more. 2 Have a good war industry Dependant on the newest/latest smart this or that. 3 Keep pushing ahead development until the Mega Smart (or whatever the latest term is) of the future will allow these so called wars to be conducted from the pentagon via a mouse, as with the right propaganda there will always be some nasties to splat, but without the need to send personnel there. 4 Well the USA has been sponsoring/encouraging/setting up a long list of nasties for many (many) years to date so why change a winning formula. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9688226)
Look at the map Bil.......
I'm no military strategist, but that looks like madness to me. Iraq, ok, got a border and a sea port, so that makes sense. Trouble is, you gotta ship all those troops and so on up a comparatively narrow waterway. In the war games the yanks played against an American general taking the part of Saddam, he sank most of the big shipping with the loss of thousands of lives, simply by placing a few loyalists in fishing boats with a cheapo one shot, shoulder launched misslie. Whop one of those in at the waterline, and your multi million dollar aircraft carrier is suddenly relegated to being a fish action park, and the death toll from repeating the trick with a couple of troop carriers would damn soon quench America's taste for that war. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 9688207)
Absolutely right. I'll take that into consideration right after my hang gliding trip thru Hell.
When it comes down to the treatment of an individual soldier, or even the leader of an army, yeah, I agree proper treatment is a must. However, Gaddafi is such a shit, that I'm prepared to turn a blind eye. Tell you what. Get that scumbag blair up on war crimes, and Bush in the dock with him, get them convicted and I'll think about looking into Gaddafi's death. Right after hell freezes over. I suppose it makes sense, it's the view of the British masses and I may not agree with them, but respect their stance. |
Re: GADAFFI IS DEAD.
Originally Posted by licinius
(Post 9688224)
What has Gaddafi ever done to you Bil? Have you ever had the opportunity to form a balanced viewpoint, or are you reiterating opinions of the media?
oh, and what did he do to me ? simple He blew up one of my school mates and scattered him over various parts of Lockerbie |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:08 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.