![]() |
Faith
Since we are talking about those who believe, or as I like to think of them, the 'Hard of Thinking', here's a little question.
How come faith healers don't do teeth? |
Re: Faith
I've got no idea, Bil, but you've made me laugh.
|
Re: Faith
Excellent!
|
Re: Faith
At last he is here. A happy day for Catholics all over Britain.... today the Queen will receive a beautiful gift from the Vatican's vaults and in return she will give the Pope a relevant gift from the people of Britain... my guess is that it will be a school satchel... or maybe a "Back to school" set....
|
Re: Faith
QUEEN TO HAVE LUNCH WITH INSANE CRIMINAL
"Criminal psychologist, Dr Julian Cook, said: "Britain's mental hospitals are full of people like this. Old, confused, fascist perverts who think Jesus has set up camp in their sock drawer. " I'm crying here! |
Re: Faith
I was wondering if he thought he was landing in a third world country this morning, but he didn't go to Heathrow, he went to Edinburgh, didn't he?
Aren't they keeping him out of the West Country? I don't suppose it's worth the risk with all the sheep down there, and Methodists. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8852272)
QUEEN TO HAVE LUNCH WITH INSANE CRIMINAL
"Criminal psychologist, Dr Julian Cook, said: "Britain's mental hospitals are full of people like this. Old, confused, fascist perverts who think Jesus has set up camp in their sock drawer. " I'm crying here! I can't give you the karma you deserve for that, partly thru having sprained my liver laughing. |
Re: Faith
Funny thread, you guys are better on the day threads:rofl:
|
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 8852415)
I was wondering if he thought he was landing in a third world country this morning, but he didn't go to Heathrow, he went to Edinburgh, didn't he?
Aren't they keeping him out of the West Country? I don't suppose it's worth the risk with all the sheep down there, and Methodists. |
Re: Faith
No, they're on his side.
|
Re: Faith
1 Attachment(s)
Danger sign.;)
|
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by jdr
(Post 8855439)
Danger sign.;)
|
Re: Faith
I see the pope's assistant likened the UK to a third world country, presumably because the airport was full of tinted people.
Beats a country full of paedos, eh? In fact when the pope dies, why don't we start a campaign to get him beatified as the patron saint of kiddy fiddlers? |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 8855571)
I see the pope's assistant likened the UK to a third world country, presumably because the airport was full of tinted people.
Beats a country full of paedos, eh? In fact when the pope dies, why don't we start a campaign to get him beatified as the patron saint of kiddy fiddlers? I think the thing thats pissed people off more is the systematic cover up thats been going on for well over 100 years! |
Re: Faith
It’s a funny world we live in, we have a German Pope that used to be in the Hitler Youth, a black American president whose grandfather was a Kenyon Muslim, and the deputy Prime Minister in the UK is a Liberal, although his party got hardly any votes.
Faith? In what? |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8855703)
I was listening to the radio today and it was talking about the study done onto kiddie fiddling by profession that was done in the states, it showed that not only were Catholic priests at the bottom of that list but also that Protestant ministers are far more likely, by about 5-1 to abuse kids.
I think the thing thats pissed people off more is the systematic cover up thats been going on for well over 100 years! The stats you refer to could just be evidence of the success of the cover-up. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8855703)
I was listening to the radio today and it was talking about the study done onto kiddie fiddling by profession that was done in the states, it showed that not only were Catholic priests at the bottom of that list but also that Protestant ministers are far more likely, by about 5-1 to abuse kids.
I think the thing thats pissed people off more is the systematic cover up thats been going on for well over 100 years! Could it be merely the tip of the iceberg? http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/0...rnational.html |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 8855883)
There has been a long running cover-uo, so we do not know the number of kiddie-fiddling priests.
The stats you refer to could just be evidence of the success of the cover-up.
Originally Posted by CelticRover
(Post 8855902)
(Disclaimer, I am not now, nor ever have defending anything the Catholic faith has ever done, I never have, I am simply asking a question!) |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8855703)
I was listening to the radio today and it was talking about the study done onto kiddie fiddling by profession that was done in the states, it showed that not only were Catholic priests at the bottom of that list but also that Protestant ministers are far more likely, by about 5-1 to abuse kids.
I think the thing thats pissed people off more is the systematic cover up thats been going on for well over 100 years! "A 77 year old man who likes wearing long frocks today said the UK was like the third world. His Boss, the leader of the largest pedeophile ring in the world and also wears long frocks decided to go ahead with the visit as he thinks there are a lot of like minded nazis in the UK" |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8855917)
Absolutely and I do accept that the nature of a cover up means that things have been covered up, I just ask if the frenzy over this is more to do with the way its been covered up rather than the actual amount of children involved.
(Disclaimer, I am not now, nor ever have defending anything the Catholic faith has ever done, I never have, I am simply asking a question!) |
Re: Faith
I accept that there are paedo priests in all religions.
The fact is that those wrto catholic priests are frighteningly prevalent. It's not just the priests, the monks and nuns have previous for serious abuse, physical, sexual and mental against vulnerable children in their care. In addition, the church's attitude to all this has been dismissive, hostile to the victims and they have done their utmost to drag their feet and ignore the recommendations of the Nolan report. In addition, the current pope wrote the papal bull that states that anyone who grasses a paedo priest will be excommunicated. Not the priest, mark you, but the person who tries to bring it to the authorities. This is a completely cynical abuse of power. As I have always said, if you know someone is a kiddy fiddler, and you do nothing, you are guilty of a serious offence, plus in my eyes you are then 100% to blame for ever offence they commit afterwards, as guilty as tho you had held the child down while the paedo raped it. The pope knows it goes on, and has done nothing that will realistically even discourage priests from abusing children. |
Re: Faith
It’s incredibly sad that this has gone on for so long, hundreds of years, with millions of broken people being ignored, even now. Our law enforcers have failed, because they fall on their knees in the same places of worship where such a disproportionate number of paedos prevail.
I don’t know the answer, but I don’t frequent those places where evil masquerades as religion. Surely the leaders of those religions could simply come out and state publically that all of their priests or whatever will face criminal courts if they dare to interfere with a child? Half apologies, many years too late, aren’t good enough. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 8856170)
It’s incredibly sad that this has gone on for so long, hundreds of years, with millions of broken people being ignored, even now. Our law enforcers have failed, because they fall on their knees in the same places of worship where such a disproportionate number of paedos prevail.
I don’t know the answer, but I don’t frequent those places where evil masquerades as religion. Surely the leaders of those religions could simply come out and state publically that all of their priests or whatever will face criminal courts if they dare to interfere with a child? Half apologies, many years too late, aren’t good enough. You are so right. It is a deeply disgusting affront to civilised peoples that a major religion should act in such a hypocritical fashion. Mind you, the church has always been about oppression, power and the control of people at any price. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 8855955)
If they would have gotten their house in good order after the earlier stories, and gone in to rehab, then your probably right, that it would not have angered people as much as it has. Its partly the drip, drip, one country and one diocese after another. It just communicated the message that, at best, they did not really care. They should have spoken to a PR expert.
|
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8856257)
Oh don't get me wrong, this is brilliant, its what they needed, what they have done in the last couple of thousand years is reprehensible, we could open a whole new thread on the Catholic Church and the damage they have done to society............ but as many on here know, I am definitely not an atheist, religion has a place in many places and many people and I have seen first hand what its done to people and for the good, but this whole mess is only going to be good for a few groups of people... extremists in particular.
'Weighed, measured, and found wanting.' |
Re: Faith
Unfortunately it is not just the Roman Catholic Church.
The Church of England has and has had perverts in the clergy. Its just dealt with differently. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by whitelinen
(Post 8856342)
Unfortunately it is not just the Roman Catholic Church.
The Church of England has and has had perverts in the clergy. Its just dealt with differently. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8856350)
.... as has the teaching profession, doctors, care assistants, nursery workers, scouts.... you name it, they are there. My point is, why are we so fixated on Christianity?
a teacher might fiddle about, but the profession (as a rule) tries to boot them out and get the police involved. The perp is shunned. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8856350)
.... as has the teaching profession, doctors, care assistants, nursery workers, scouts.... you name it, they are there. My point is, why are we so fixated on Christianity?
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 8856411)
Its Institutional.....I think that is the difference
a teacher might fiddle about, but the profession (as a rule) tries to boot them out and get the police involved. The perp is shunned. When any large organization chooses coverup versus openness and correction in a scandal, the story usually takes on a life of its own, and this is what actually has happened today with many religions including catholic, over the past 100 years or more. Example: http://christianchildabuse.blogspot....logize-to.html |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 8856350)
.... as has the teaching profession, doctors, care assistants, nursery workers, scouts.... you name it, they are there. My point is, why are we so fixated on Christianity?
Because they are in a position of trust. Becuase they tell you how you should behave. Because they tell you you will go to hell if you so much as have a knuckle shuffle. Because their actions are so at odds with the message of their faith. Because they don't apologise. Because they don't do anything for the victims. Because they don't address the problem. Because they are in denial. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by bil
(Post 8856498)
Because they are in a position of trust. Becuase they tell you how you should behave. Because they tell you you will go to hell if you so much as have a knuckle shuffle. Because their actions are so at odds with the message of their faith. Because they don't apologise. Because they don't do anything for the victims. Because they don't address the problem. Because they are in denial.
Because they are men. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by whitelinen
(Post 8856563)
Because they are men.
|
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by whitelinen
(Post 8856563)
Because they are men.
As with men the true figures aren't known, but what is known is that a far greater number of cases perpetrated by women go unreported or else swept under the carpet for fairly obvious reasons ,than with men. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 8856619)
A somewhat stupid statement in view of the number of females involved in sex abuse.
As with men the true figures aren't known, but what is known is that a far greater number of cases perpetrated by women go unreported or else swept under the carpet for fairly obvious reasons ,than with men. As you cannot quote statistics I think your response is strange but predictable. Take for instance the RC and C of E in GB...........what percentage do you think were/are women perverts? |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by whitelinen
(Post 8856656)
As you cannot quote statistics I think your response is strange but predictable.
Take for instance the RC and C of E in GB...........what percentage do you think were/are women perverts? |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by whitelinen
(Post 8856656)
As you cannot quote statistics I think your response is strange but predictable.
Take for instance the RC and C of E in GB...........what percentage do you think were/are women perverts? I've seen a number of documentaries explaining the likely reasons. For instance women are much more likely to report their partners for sexual abuse, than visa versa. Men find it much more difficult and embarrassing to spill the beans on their partners, partly because they think it reflects badly on themselves, for not being aware of it happening under their noses and for not having stopped it immediately. Also they are less inclined to allow it to break up their partnership. Men often prefer to go on to deal with it themselves, rather than expose themselves,their partners and family to the effects of full exposure. I'm not trying to justify the conduct of either sex, but merely to partly explain why sexual abuse by men is much more likely to come to light than cases involving women. |
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 8856701)
I'm not trying to justify the conduct of either sex, but merely to partly explain why sexual abuse by men is much more likely to come to light than cases involving women. No I was just curious as to what other people think is the percentage of women sex abusers in the church because I think the majority must be men. From what I hear from friends nuns were vicious to them but none were tampered with. |
Re: Faith
Of course, then again, in secondary school, there was that French student exchange teacher who looked and sounded remarkably like Bridget Bardot in her prime. One could only dream...............no talk of child abuse in those days.:ohmy:
|
Re: Faith
Originally Posted by CelticRover
(Post 8856711)
Of course, then again, in secondary school, there was that French student exchange teacher who looked and sounded remarkably like Bridget Bardot in her prime. One could only dream...............no talk of child abuse in those days.:ohmy:
Exactly,another case to prove my point. Still having wet dreams about my French teacher.:rofl: |
Re: Faith
I think the answer is to take it on a case by case basis.:huh::unsure:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...w=1414&bih=654 |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:33 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.