![]() |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Absolutely. :goodpost:
|
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by gerry75
(Post 10929679)
We are thinking of buying a house in Spain. We met a couple who have a house in Chiclana. The house is not legal yet and they do not have electricity. They told us they had been told that the legalisation would cost 35,000 Euros. They do not have the money so want to sell. They told us that the legalisation could be done at the time of selling. We are thinking of going to Chiclana and view the house.
does this seem OK or fishy? As has been said, the Chiclana Town plan has not officially been announced yet, and will take time to be approved into law. However, if the land the house stands on is approved for building, then some people (including me) will take a chance to buy a very cheap property in a lovely part of the world. The cost of Urbanisation is unknown; it has been said the price will be capped; but on the other hand, there are those that say it is illegal to subsidise legalisation. Chiclana is not for the faint-hearted; I sleep well of a night and think that it will all sort itself out many years (decades) after I am gone. Davexf |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Dxf
(Post 10930859)
Hi
As has been said, the Chiclana Town plan has not officially been announced yet, and will take time to be approved into law. However, if the land the house stands on is approved for building, then some people (including me) will take a chance to buy a very cheap property in a lovely part of the world. The cost of Urbanisation is unknown; it has been said the price will be capped; but on the other hand, there are those that say it is illegal to subsidise legalisation. Chiclana is not for the faint-hearted; I sleep well of a night and think that it will all sort itself out many years (decades) after I am gone. Davexf I agree with that. As you know Dave, we are classed as alegal, which is neither legal nor illegal as we have an older house. My opinion is that it´s dreadful that people who bought new builds in good faith (both Spanish and ex-pat from any country) should be made to pay for the underhand tactics etc of builders, promoters, estate agents, notaries and lawyers. xxx |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Dxf
(Post 10930859)
Hi
As has been said, the Chiclana Town plan has not officially been announced yet, and will take time to be approved into law. However, if the land the house stands on is approved for building, then some people (including me) will take a chance to buy a very cheap property in a lovely part of the world. The cost of Urbanisation is unknown; it has been said the price will be capped; but on the other hand, there are those that say it is illegal to subsidise legalisation. Chiclana is not for the faint-hearted; I sleep well of a night and think that it will all sort itself out many years (decades) after I am gone. Davexf |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by jjh
(Post 10930867)
I agree with that. As you know Dave, we are classed as alegal, which is neither legal nor illegal as we have an older house. My opinion is that it´s dreadful that people who bought new builds in good faith (both Spanish and ex-pat from any country) should be made to pay for the underhand tactics etc of builders, promoters, estate agents, notaries and lawyers.
xxx And that is why I don't think it will be sorted for a long time. The "builders, promoters, estate agents, notaries and lawyers" simply don't have sufficient money to legalise all the illegal properties. So who pays? I honestly believe that it is the owners who will eventually be left holding the baby Davexf |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Why do they need the money if it´s down to the owners?
|
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
I wish all in Chiclana all the best in their endeavours
BUT....(isn't there always one of those) Other town halls have tried rewriting their PGOU to include areas already containing illegal properties and had them refused by the Andalucian Junta. The grounds are that a) the land wasn't zoned for urbanisation when the properties were built b) local efforts of zoning for urbanisation will break the law of the land with regard to national Land Law (Ley de Suelo) which takes precedence over regional laws and any regional legislation must reflect any changes made to it. c) properties built with the expectancy of waiting 4/10 years and getting a walk thru with permissions will not be able to be made legal d) as the Environmental people continually point out, many illegal properties have no or poor quality sewerage facilities and rely on water courses and wells that are filled from water draining through the land, contaminated by such sewerage. e) even certificates of habitation issued by Town Halls for properties that are built on Agrario rather than Urbano land are not worth the paper they are printed on. If you have bought a property that is illegal there is no protection for you or your home - it remains illegal, you should have carried out the proper due diligence and ensured the legal status before handing over a penny. At the least, if in any doubt, do a google search for Illegal properties in the area you are considering and follow your instincts. you wouldn't spend quarter of a million pounds on a property in the UK without ensuring every thing is kosher - so why go to a foreign country and do it there without worrying about it. in fact you wouldn't spend 10k on a car without ensuring it is legal, so what happens when you arrive in the sun, put on a sombrero and start to lose your brains ` |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10930891)
I wish all in Chiclana all the best in their endeavours
BUT....(isn't there always one of those) Other town halls have tried rewriting their PGOU to include areas already containing illegal properties and had them refused by the Andalucian Junta. The grounds are that a) the land wasn't zoned for urbanisation when the properties were built ` Well actually, Yes it was. And that is the crux of the problem. The council published a PGOU and before you could say "Jack Robinson", there were illegal houses built on every piece of land that was zoned for housing. The houses were built without permission because the fines for doing so were less than the cost of getting permission - and it would take too long to do so. To demolish the 300,000 illegal houses in AndalucÃa would be unthinkable. Spain would loose all credence simply thinking it. And the EU wouldn't let it happen. The solution will be a long time coming - but there will be a solution. Davexf |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Dxf
(Post 10930902)
Hi
Well actually, Yes it was. And that is the crux of the problem. The council published a PGOU and before you could say "Jack Robinson", there were illegal houses built on every piece of land that was zoned for housing. The houses were built without permission because the fines for doing so were less than the cost of getting permission - and it would take too long to do so. To demolish the 300,000 illegal houses in AndalucÃa would be unthinkable. Spain would loose all credence simply thinking it. And the EU wouldn't let it happen. The solution will be a long time coming - but there will be a solution. Davexf use the catastral facility on Goolzoom, check the status of properties - whilst it "may" be out of date or not updated when you find complete hamlets of new build sitting there on agrario you will see the size of the problem Albox has over 12,500 illegals in the Almanzora Valley, the latest draft PGOU is proposing the urbanisation of land in areas without any houses or just extending existing urbano segments. This will not resolve the problem. for someone of say 60 buying a retirement home, even if they live to 80 or 85 they are unlikely to see the property legalised, and if so it will cost them more although they have already paid for all documentation. And paid IBI/Basura all that time what a situation to leave to the kids when you die :thumbdown: |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 10930720)
I don't think you missed much - it was dross IMO, just old news rehashed, they featured the Priors' house, a few examples of houses being viewed and "five years ago it was worth xxxx and now it's on the market for only xxxx", nothing new at all.
Oh, and my twopennyworth to Gerry75 - as others have said, I wouldn't touch a house you know to be illegal with a bargepole, I certainly wouldn't want the stress or financial uncertainty of not knowing whether it could be legalised or what it might cost if it were possible. It must be awful to have tried to take all possible steps to ensure that you followed the right procedures and took professional advice and in spite of it all ended up with a property that has been deemed illegal for whatever reason, but I could not understand anybody putting themselves in that situation deliberately. |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10930891)
I wish all in Chiclana all the best in their endeavours
BUT....(isn't there always one of those) Other town halls have tried rewriting their PGOU to include areas already containing illegal properties and had them refused by the Andalucian Junta. The grounds are that a) the land wasn't zoned for urbanisation when the properties were built b) local efforts of zoning for urbanisation will break the law of the land with regard to national Land Law (Ley de Suelo) which takes precedence over regional laws and any regional legislation must reflect any changes made to it. c) properties built with the expectancy of waiting 4/10 years and getting a walk thru with permissions will not be able to be made legal d) as the Environmental people continually point out, many illegal properties have no or poor quality sewerage facilities and rely on water courses and wells that are filled from water draining through the land, contaminated by such sewerage. e) even certificates of habitation issued by Town Halls for properties that are built on Agrario rather than Urbano land are not worth the paper they are printed on. If you have bought a property that is illegal there is no protection for you or your home - it remains illegal, you should have carried out the proper due diligence and ensured the legal status before handing over a penny. At the least, if in any doubt, do a google search for Illegal properties in the area you are considering and follow your instincts. you wouldn't spend quarter of a million pounds on a property in the UK without ensuring every thing is kosher - so why go to a foreign country and do it there without worrying about it. in fact you wouldn't spend 10k on a car without ensuring it is legal, so what happens when you arrive in the sun, put on a sombrero and start to lose your brains ` So you think if we bought an illegal property here in Spain it is because we lost our brains. Our biggest mistake was to trust those we should have been able to trust e.g. lawyers, estate agents, bank mangers and their surveyors. No I wouldn´t expect to buy an illegal property in the U.K. as I would have done exactly what I did in Spain trust the lawyer etc. etc. Buyers who buy in good faith are not the problem here it is the corrupt people that we dealt with, they are the problem not us. Our house will eventually be demolished as it is built on protected land (ley de costas) we relied on the lawyer to make sure everything was above board just as we would have done in the U.K. We bought two houses during our time in the U.K. it never ocurred to us that they would be illegal as we had lawyers dealing with all the paperwork just as we did here in Spain. Our mistake was that we trusted the professionals who we should have been able to trust to their job correctly. |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
The bottom line seems to be that Spain is culturally corrupt so until Spain's courts start taking corruption seriously (maybe next century:() it makes a lot more sense to let your UK home and rent one in Spain.
|
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by YMF
(Post 10929717)
I would be very careful and consult a good lawyer
|
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
Originally Posted by caroline c
(Post 10931462)
So you think if we bought an illegal property here in Spain it is because we lost our brains.
Our biggest mistake was to trust those we should have been able to trust e.g. lawyers, estate agents, bank mangers and their surveyors. |
Re: Demolition is proving difficult
I sold my villa recently.
I was put in touch with the buyer after the event and discovered that he had actually paid €10k more than I had been told it had been sold for and that the estate agent had tried to sell the car (which was included in the price) as a separate deal. Originally I had been told that he had offered €20k under the asking price, whereas he had always offered the asking price. It's not my problem now, as I am out of Spain, but I feel sorry for the buyer who paid €10k in cash at the time of completion. Luckily, I hadn't paid the estate agent his massive fee, so draw your own conclusions. Buying or selling a property in Spain can be a nightmare. One of the most important pieces of advice I can give is speak directly to the buyer / seller all the time. Then you know exactly what the score is, and each of you would be fully aware of any scams. Trust no one, don't use a solicitor recommended by the seller / estate agent (as my buyer did!) and NEVER get involved in cash payments in the corridor! Do your own checks with the town hall and maybe even use a gestor to do some independent checking for you |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:08 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.