Which is in the deepest trouble?
#1
Which is in the deepest trouble?
English Football, English Cricket or English Rugby? Or maybe Spanish cycling...
#3
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
Still not sure whether he meant it as a joke, or it was a genuine ColemanBalls, but a TV commentator said of the African Nations Cup "Well, it seems likely that an African team will win this, or maybe Spain..."
It doesn't really matter who takes over the England football team, they don't have the players to win it. There are at least 5 teams who are totally superior to us (Germany, Spain, Holland, France, Italy). How many English players would walk into the Spain or France side? Rooney and Cole, perhaps. I feel sorry for Harry - he can hardly turn down his best chance of ever being manager of England, but as soon as they perform badly, he'll be made the scapegoat. He's full of optimism though. He'a alleged to have said "Euros? No problem! - so long as they are unmarked and unused..."
Hard to feel enthusiasm for the rugby side - for as long as I can remember they've played the most boring rugby - they almost kill the game. It's got to the stage where I prefer to see Wales or Ireland do well
It doesn't really matter who takes over the England football team, they don't have the players to win it. There are at least 5 teams who are totally superior to us (Germany, Spain, Holland, France, Italy). How many English players would walk into the Spain or France side? Rooney and Cole, perhaps. I feel sorry for Harry - he can hardly turn down his best chance of ever being manager of England, but as soon as they perform badly, he'll be made the scapegoat. He's full of optimism though. He'a alleged to have said "Euros? No problem! - so long as they are unmarked and unused..."
Hard to feel enthusiasm for the rugby side - for as long as I can remember they've played the most boring rugby - they almost kill the game. It's got to the stage where I prefer to see Wales or Ireland do well
#4
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
I think Harry would be very ill-advised to do the poisoned chalice England job.
I agree about the England Rugby side - not since the early '80s have we seen anything other than the odd flash of flair. I'm hoping for more from this side but give it time.
At least England won a cricket match the other day.
I agree about the England Rugby side - not since the early '80s have we seen anything other than the odd flash of flair. I'm hoping for more from this side but give it time.
At least England won a cricket match the other day.
#6
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
I think Harry would be very ill-advised to do the poisoned chalice England job.
I agree about the England Rugby side - not since the early '80s have we seen anything other than the odd flash of flair. I'm hoping for more from this side but give it time.
At least England won a cricket match the other day.
I agree about the England Rugby side - not since the early '80s have we seen anything other than the odd flash of flair. I'm hoping for more from this side but give it time.
At least England won a cricket match the other day.
#7
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
I suspect we have played the two weakest teams in the tournament - things will have to change now...
#8
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
But we'll see if we come up against France or Italy - in fact don't we play France in the initial group? By your ratings argument we should storm the group. I fear we'll be lucky to come 2nd. But let's see. We need to play well for once in a major tournament, but I fear it's beyond our players. I'll be very glad to be proven wrong.
#9
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Which is in the deepest trouble?
Still not sure whether he meant it as a joke, or it was a genuine ColemanBalls, but a TV commentator said of the African Nations Cup "Well, it seems likely that an African team will win this, or maybe Spain..."
It doesn't really matter who takes over the England football team, they don't have the players to win it. There are at least 5 teams who are totally superior to us (Germany, Spain, Holland, France, Italy). How many English players would walk into the Spain or France side? Rooney and Cole, perhaps. I feel sorry for Harry - he can hardly turn down his best chance of ever being manager of England, but as soon as they perform badly, he'll be made the scapegoat. He's full of optimism though. He'a alleged to have said "Euros? No problem! - so long as they are unmarked and unused..."
Hard to feel enthusiasm for the rugby side - for as long as I can remember they've played the most boring rugby - they almost kill the game. It's got to the stage where I prefer to see Wales or Ireland do well
It doesn't really matter who takes over the England football team, they don't have the players to win it. There are at least 5 teams who are totally superior to us (Germany, Spain, Holland, France, Italy). How many English players would walk into the Spain or France side? Rooney and Cole, perhaps. I feel sorry for Harry - he can hardly turn down his best chance of ever being manager of England, but as soon as they perform badly, he'll be made the scapegoat. He's full of optimism though. He'a alleged to have said "Euros? No problem! - so long as they are unmarked and unused..."
Hard to feel enthusiasm for the rugby side - for as long as I can remember they've played the most boring rugby - they almost kill the game. It's got to the stage where I prefer to see Wales or Ireland do well
and the Committee of the FA are renowned for their blaming everyone else except themselves.
They appoint the manager so they should be the ones who fall on their swords when he doesnt do what they want.
and as to other posts, must agree, whoever takes on the job has serious problem as there just isnt the pool of eager players out there. Or is there, after all its always the same old tired faces game after game. Perhaps a really radical change and bring in some of the unknowns will change the way ahead ? ?