croocked lawyer
#1
Thread Starter
Forum Regular

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 32

How can you fight back a lawyer?
Last edited by jan123; Jan 12th 2013 at 9:21 am.
#2
Think of how difficult it would be to win against a crooked layer in the UK then you have a inkling of how hard it would be in Spain.
Forget it
Forget it
#4
Thread Starter
Forum Regular

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 32

This is a general question . I cannot give more info at this stage
Thank you
Thank you
#5
One of the things you shouldnt do, is talk about it on an open forum as it may prejudice your case eventually
#9
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 385
From: Girona/Barcelona











The thread title brought a wry smile to my face as I read it....
8 yrs ago before I bought the house we now live in I signed a 'contract de arras' and paid a deposit of 17,000 Euros on a different one we had found and fallen in love with....After a months negotiations a date was set to sign and all was well....Suddenly the sellers informed us that they were unable to leave the property for another 8 months as their new build had problems...I offered them a flat I owned as temporary accommodation but they refused to talk to us, mainly due to embarrassment. After consulting a lawyer who agreed that they would have to pay back the deposit plus the same amount again by law but it could take anything up to 2 yrs to go through the system, he suggested offering them a compromise...In the end they agreed to pay back the deposit plus an extra 25% if we accepted a quick closure....We did.......The year before last I met the sellers by accident and it wasn't a pleasant incident....They ended up informing me that they had in fact paid the lawyer 75% plus the deposit to save going to court and possibly paying costs.
After confronting the lawyer and him admitting the details.... I have smacked the lawyer in the teeth twice and have informed him that whenever I meet him in the future I will do the same....I haven't had any repercussion as yet and don't expect to....There is no other way to administer retribution, no matter the country...
8 yrs ago before I bought the house we now live in I signed a 'contract de arras' and paid a deposit of 17,000 Euros on a different one we had found and fallen in love with....After a months negotiations a date was set to sign and all was well....Suddenly the sellers informed us that they were unable to leave the property for another 8 months as their new build had problems...I offered them a flat I owned as temporary accommodation but they refused to talk to us, mainly due to embarrassment. After consulting a lawyer who agreed that they would have to pay back the deposit plus the same amount again by law but it could take anything up to 2 yrs to go through the system, he suggested offering them a compromise...In the end they agreed to pay back the deposit plus an extra 25% if we accepted a quick closure....We did.......The year before last I met the sellers by accident and it wasn't a pleasant incident....They ended up informing me that they had in fact paid the lawyer 75% plus the deposit to save going to court and possibly paying costs.
After confronting the lawyer and him admitting the details.... I have smacked the lawyer in the teeth twice and have informed him that whenever I meet him in the future I will do the same....I haven't had any repercussion as yet and don't expect to....There is no other way to administer retribution, no matter the country...
#10
Nice one Mr Beast. 
I was thinking along the same lines myself as being the best chance of justice in most similar circumstances, but somewhat reluctant to suggest it.
As most will know there is the Law Society in England which is supposed to assist in settling clients grievances against dodgy lawyers.
However in practice it is little more than another protective line of defence for bent lawyers and short of them being caught red-handed with their grubby paws in the till, it's generally a total waste of time and effort.
To employ another lawyer to act against the bent one on your behalf is also probably a total waste of time and effort.
They'll likely give the impression of acting on your behalf and happily take your money, but at the end of the day they almost all piss in the same pot and probably little or nothing will become of your efforts.

I was thinking along the same lines myself as being the best chance of justice in most similar circumstances, but somewhat reluctant to suggest it.
As most will know there is the Law Society in England which is supposed to assist in settling clients grievances against dodgy lawyers.
However in practice it is little more than another protective line of defence for bent lawyers and short of them being caught red-handed with their grubby paws in the till, it's generally a total waste of time and effort.
To employ another lawyer to act against the bent one on your behalf is also probably a total waste of time and effort.
They'll likely give the impression of acting on your behalf and happily take your money, but at the end of the day they almost all piss in the same pot and probably little or nothing will become of your efforts.
#11
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,367











Nice one Mr Beast. 
I was thinking along the same lines myself as being the best chance of justice in most similar circumstances, but somewhat reluctant to suggest it.
As most will know there is the Law Society in England which is supposed to assist in settling clients grievances against dodgy lawyers.
However in practice it is little more than another protective line of defence for bent lawyers and short of them being caught red-handed with their grubby paws in the till, it's generally a total waste of time and effort.
To employ another lawyer to act against the bent one on your behalf is also probably a total waste of time and effort.
They'll likely give the impression of acting on your behalf and happily take your money, but at the end of the day they almost all piss in the same pot and probably little or nothing will become of your efforts.

I was thinking along the same lines myself as being the best chance of justice in most similar circumstances, but somewhat reluctant to suggest it.
As most will know there is the Law Society in England which is supposed to assist in settling clients grievances against dodgy lawyers.
However in practice it is little more than another protective line of defence for bent lawyers and short of them being caught red-handed with their grubby paws in the till, it's generally a total waste of time and effort.
To employ another lawyer to act against the bent one on your behalf is also probably a total waste of time and effort.
They'll likely give the impression of acting on your behalf and happily take your money, but at the end of the day they almost all piss in the same pot and probably little or nothing will become of your efforts.

In an average year 50 solicitors are struck off, two or three barristers debarred, seven dentists prevented from practising, and 17 accountants excluded
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...t-1287836.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...t-1287836.html
#12
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 499











You might stand a chance if you find a lawyer who is not in the same college as the one you're pursuing - go to a different area.
#13
As regards Spain I haven't got a clue, but if the corruption in other areas is anything of a guide then it probably doesn't bear thinking about.
#14
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,367











I guess I'm not as well informed as you, I have to admit to not studying all the individual cases, so no idea that they are repeat offenders. My wife worked until recently in the legal profession, so she's also learnt something she didn't know.
#15
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 977











You all love lawyers then! That is reassuring to know.
The Law Society does not oversee lawyers its the guys in Leamington Spa.
The Law Society does not oversee lawyers its the guys in Leamington Spa.



