Bank repossesion.
#1
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 882
Bank repossesion.
This is someone owns two properties one with a mortgage and the other owned outright. They are unable to make the mortgage payments and are looking at having to let the bank reposses
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
#2
Re: Bank repossesion.
It always amazes me that people want to give their houses back to the bank in lieu of what they owe... I think actually they took the "money" from the bank and not the "house". Maybe give the house back to the previous owner, get the money back and give back to the bank what they took. Banks aren't real estate agents and really don't want the houses.
#3
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Bank repossesion.
It always amazes me that people want to give their houses back to the bank in lieu of what they owe... I think actually they took the "money" from the bank and not the "house". Maybe give the house back to the previous owner, get the money back and give back to the bank what they took. Banks aren't real estate agents and really don't want the houses.
#4
Re: Bank repossesion.
It always amazes me that people want to give their houses back to the bank in lieu of what they owe... I think actually they took the "money" from the bank and not the "house". Maybe give the house back to the previous owner, get the money back and give back to the bank what they took. Banks aren't real estate agents and really don't want the houses.
#6
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London (mainly)/Oliva
Posts: 2,137
Re: Bank repossesion.
This is someone owns two properties one with a mortgage and the other owned outright. They are unable to make the mortgage payments and are looking at having to let the bank reposses
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
Last edited by johnnyone; Jul 19th 2011 at 9:36 am. Reason: Additional note added
#7
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 882
Re: Bank repossesion.
I'm still not clear what the debt is. Is it 30,000€, the amount to pay off the mortgage or is it 66,000€ the total of the 20 year mortgage?
It is my understanding that it is the latter as the bank consider their future loss as relevant, although in reality this is just them being greedy they are allowed by law to persue this "loss".
My main question still remains, is there a possibility they could take the other property to cover any outstanding debt?
#8
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Bank repossesion.
can they let the property to provide income to cover the mortgage payments ??
#9
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 385
Re: Bank repossesion.
of course the bank will go after the other property's equity for the shortfall - otherwise the debt would be picked up by all bank customers in the form of a write off.
The only person benefiting is the bank managers brother who will get it for the mortgage value plus a coffee.
The only person benefiting is the bank managers brother who will get it for the mortgage value plus a coffee.
#11
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 882
Re: Bank repossesion.
Thanks to you all for that advice.
It is as they feared that they could end up losing both.
Maybe the court will put an "hold" on the second property rather than insisting it be sold.
I don't know how banks are allowed to get away with it, because the only loss the bank will make is the profit they could have made.
They will get a house worth 70,000€ plus the 25,000€ already paid on the original 35,000€ mortgage, so that's 95,000€ for at most a 66,000€ debt AND the possibility of losing their second home....crazy world.
It is as they feared that they could end up losing both.
Maybe the court will put an "hold" on the second property rather than insisting it be sold.
I don't know how banks are allowed to get away with it, because the only loss the bank will make is the profit they could have made.
They will get a house worth 70,000€ plus the 25,000€ already paid on the original 35,000€ mortgage, so that's 95,000€ for at most a 66,000€ debt AND the possibility of losing their second home....crazy world.
#12
Banned
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,008
Re: Bank repossesion.
This is someone owns two properties one with a mortgage and the other owned outright. They are unable to make the mortgage payments and are looking at having to let the bank reposses
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
The mortgaged property has 30,000€ to pay off but has 15 years still to run, so in total we are looking at 66,000€. If the property is valued at 70,000€ would that satisfy the bank or would they come after the second property.
Many thanks
I may be a bit dim here, but if the mortgage owed is for 30k why do they need to pay 66k?
If there is 15 years to go and the mortgage runs for the whole term, then the total interest may add up to 60k, but the bank cannot demant 15 years interest on a loan that is repaid early.
it could well be a couple of thou on top that the bank bungs on the outstanding amount, for lost interest.
#13
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 882
Re: Bank repossesion.
I may be a bit dim here, but if the mortgage owed is for 30k why do they need to pay 66k?
If there is 15 years to go and the mortgage runs for the whole term, then the total interest may add up to 60k, but the bank cannot demant 15 years interest on a loan that is repaid early.
it could well be a couple of thou on top that the bank bungs on the outstanding amount, for lost interest.
If there is 15 years to go and the mortgage runs for the whole term, then the total interest may add up to 60k, but the bank cannot demant 15 years interest on a loan that is repaid early.
it could well be a couple of thou on top that the bank bungs on the outstanding amount, for lost interest.
#15
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Bank repossesion.
as with certain uk institutions there may be an "early repayment" sum of a couple of hundred euros - and the bank will be entitled to claim for legal expenses which could easily ramp up to a couple of thousand - but its getting to that point is the problem