The Saville Case - who's next
Oct 29th 2012, 4:56 am
#1
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
The Saville Case - who's next
Oct 29th 2012, 5:39 am
#2
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,096
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
never trusted Matthew Kelly
Oct 29th 2012, 5:47 am
#3
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
There are so many from that time what could be implicated (I'm not saying guilty, but aware/known):
Cheggers: 25-1
Reid: 20-1
Kelly: evens (no smoke without fire)
Tarrent: 16-3
Corbett: evens (always had his hand up Sue and wasn't shy with Sooty)
Wilmot: 100-1 (outsider)
Jim Davidson: 15-1 (has come forward saying the witch hunt has to stop - sign of guilt)
Edmunds: never trust a man with a beard.
Rantzen has all the answers here in my view. She needs to start grassing.
Cheggers: 25-1
Reid: 20-1
Kelly: evens (no smoke without fire)
Tarrent: 16-3
Corbett: evens (always had his hand up Sue and wasn't shy with Sooty)
Wilmot: 100-1 (outsider)
Jim Davidson: 15-1 (has come forward saying the witch hunt has to stop - sign of guilt)
Edmunds: never trust a man with a beard.
Rantzen has all the answers here in my view. She needs to start grassing.
Oct 29th 2012, 5:52 am
#4
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
The way that copper was talking on Sky News on Friday suggests this is even bigger than any of us have realised........
........... I'm going for a link (perhaps nothing more than that) to a member of the royal family..........
........... I'm going for a link (perhaps nothing more than that) to a member of the royal family..........
Oct 29th 2012, 5:54 am
#5
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,838
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
His mate 'Jim the pill' from the Louis Theroux doco has to be a contender.
Oct 29th 2012, 5:54 am
#6
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Disneyland, Dubai
Posts: 15,887
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Please, please - let it be Bliar.
Oct 29th 2012, 6:01 am
#7
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Doha
Posts: 735
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
All of the Osmonds
Oct 29th 2012, 6:04 am
#8
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
That bellend with the giant hammer and luminous clothing, used to present kiddies TV....Timmy Mallett. That's another.
Jeremy Beadle? He was the only person with a hand small enough surely?
Jeremy Beadle? He was the only person with a hand small enough surely?
Oct 29th 2012, 6:07 am
#10
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
I just read through the lists posted saying 'yeah I bet he did', 'oh god I hope he get's done for something'.
Oct 29th 2012, 6:14 am
#11
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,107
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Why? Do you have any factual basis for that or is it a gut reaction to him personally because he's a bit effeminate? No danger of a witch hunt here then, eh?
As I recall, the previous accusations against Kelly were thoroughly discredited. He had my sympathy because he was a pretty easy target. Any apparently gay/effeminate man in public life has always been particularly vulnerable to random accusations of kiddy fiddling because of deep-seated prejudices.
And the "no smoke without fire" comment that followed yours only emphasises the danger of this becoming a mindless witch hunt and ruining the lives of innocent people.
As I recall, the previous accusations against Kelly were thoroughly discredited. He had my sympathy because he was a pretty easy target. Any apparently gay/effeminate man in public life has always been particularly vulnerable to random accusations of kiddy fiddling because of deep-seated prejudices.
And the "no smoke without fire" comment that followed yours only emphasises the danger of this becoming a mindless witch hunt and ruining the lives of innocent people.
Oct 29th 2012, 6:19 am
#12
**** it we'll do it live
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 7,892
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
Why? Do you have any factual basis for that or is it a gut reaction to him personally because he's a bit effeminate? No danger of a witch hunt here then, eh?
As I recall, the previous accusations against Kelly were thoroughly discredited. He had my sympathy because he was a pretty easy target. Any apparently gay/effeminate man in public life has always been particularly vulnerable to random accusations of kiddy fiddling because of deep-seated prejudices.
And the "no smoke without fire" comment that followed yours only emphasises the danger of this becoming a mindless witch hunt and ruining the lives of innocent people.
As I recall, the previous accusations against Kelly were thoroughly discredited. He had my sympathy because he was a pretty easy target. Any apparently gay/effeminate man in public life has always been particularly vulnerable to random accusations of kiddy fiddling because of deep-seated prejudices.
And the "no smoke without fire" comment that followed yours only emphasises the danger of this becoming a mindless witch hunt and ruining the lives of innocent people.
Oct 29th 2012, 6:47 am
#15
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,096
Re: The Saville Case - who's next
There are so many from that time what could be implicated (I'm not saying guilty, but aware/known):
Cheggers: 25-1
Reid: 20-1
Kelly: evens (no smoke without fire)
Tarrent: 16-3
Corbett: evens (always had his hand up Sue and wasn't shy with Sooty)
Wilmot: 100-1 (outsider)
Jim Davidson: 15-1 (has come forward saying the witch hunt has to stop - sign of guilt)
Edmunds: never trust a man with a beard.
Rantzen has all the answers here in my view. She needs to start grassing.
Cheggers: 25-1
Reid: 20-1
Kelly: evens (no smoke without fire)
Tarrent: 16-3
Corbett: evens (always had his hand up Sue and wasn't shy with Sooty)
Wilmot: 100-1 (outsider)
Jim Davidson: 15-1 (has come forward saying the witch hunt has to stop - sign of guilt)
Edmunds: never trust a man with a beard.
Rantzen has all the answers here in my view. She needs to start grassing.