The EU after Brexit
#121
Re: The EU after Brexit
which has to be hit for six months consecutively before applying as well, so the applicant had better hope they have some very good natured grandparents, or access to free five days a week government childcare.
so yeah, it's not impossible....
so yeah, it's not impossible....
#123
Re: The EU after Brexit
And how would the father do that when he's not in the country to take care of the children?
Or are you seriously suggesting that the father is working in his home country, which may or may not be a lower income country, to pay for full time childcare while the mother works for six months to get the 18k income?
err yeah, it's not impossible.
Or are you seriously suggesting that the father is working in his home country, which may or may not be a lower income country, to pay for full time childcare while the mother works for six months to get the 18k income?
err yeah, it's not impossible.
#124
Re: The EU after Brexit
And how would the father do that when he's not in the country to take care of the children?
Or are you seriously suggesting that the father is working in his home country, which may or may not be a lower income country, to pay for full time childcare while the mother works for six months to get the 18k income?
err yeah, it's not impossible.
Or are you seriously suggesting that the father is working in his home country, which may or may not be a lower income country, to pay for full time childcare while the mother works for six months to get the 18k income?
err yeah, it's not impossible.
#128
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: The EU after Brexit
First time I've genuinely listened to Corbyn, you know, with actual focus on what he's saying and how etc. Turns out my previous opinion still stands correct, the mans a ****ing clown.
#129
Re: The EU after Brexit
May is a trooper, but she'll be done soon. What a job.
Brexit won't happen - this wasn't a vote for crashing out, it's a vote for ref2
#ref2
#130
Re: The EU after Brexit
What's the benefit of the fire stick over the standard apps on your TV?
#131
Re: The EU after Brexit
Couldn't install the following on the samsung TV:
1. a vpn
2. Skynews app
The DNS trick works for iplayer etc. a VPN is needed for other material that is blocked on Etishite but was not blocked on Du.
1. a vpn
2. Skynews app
The DNS trick works for iplayer etc. a VPN is needed for other material that is blocked on Etishite but was not blocked on Du.
#132
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: The EU after Brexit
I had just set up my firestick so watched it live. Corbyn was doing so well until he had to turn the page of his notes and lost track, albeit briefly.
May is a trooper, but she'll be done soon. What a job.
Brexit won't happen - this wasn't a vote for crashing out, it's a vote for ref2
#ref2
May is a trooper, but she'll be done soon. What a job.
Brexit won't happen - this wasn't a vote for crashing out, it's a vote for ref2
#ref2
Anyway.
I think it will still happen. The fall out of it not happening is monumental isn't it? Riots? Discord?
What I sort of don't get is why when article 50 was triggered, we didn't start the negotiating then...not for a temporary deal, but for permanent ones. The deals being voted on are for under 2 years to make the transition smoother. If it takes sub 2 years of time after we withdraw to secure enough agreements to not just jump off a cliff......why not start and finish that when it was triggered in the first place?
#133
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,520
Re: The EU after Brexit
I hope enough people see through the way he's behaved in driving this into the ground in thinning hopes of him securing a general election win out of it. His behaviour has put his own ambitions and desires ahead of everything else and whilst commendable (because **** me he's nearly managed it) it's disgraceful to be such an obvious champagne socialist.....but again, **** me, people believe him don't they?
Anyway.
I think it will still happen. The fall out of it not happening is monumental isn't it? Riots? Discord?
What I sort of don't get is why when article 50 was triggered, we didn't start the negotiating then...not for a temporary deal, but for permanent ones. The deals being voted on are for under 2 years to make the transition smoother. If it takes sub 2 years of time after we withdraw to secure enough agreements to not just jump off a cliff......why not start and finish that when it was triggered in the first place?
Anyway.
I think it will still happen. The fall out of it not happening is monumental isn't it? Riots? Discord?
What I sort of don't get is why when article 50 was triggered, we didn't start the negotiating then...not for a temporary deal, but for permanent ones. The deals being voted on are for under 2 years to make the transition smoother. If it takes sub 2 years of time after we withdraw to secure enough agreements to not just jump off a cliff......why not start and finish that when it was triggered in the first place?
Yes, logically, it should have happened alongside the WA but the EU refused to budge from their rules governing the negotiations. It might (and I use that word lightly) have been possible for the British negotiators to refuse to discuss the WA unless the EU was willing to discuss the permanent trade treaty alongside it but if that was ever possible we obviously missed the opportunity long ago.
The whole point of the Irish backstop tied to the WA is to have an insurance in case the actual deal with the EU fell through that the border would remain open. Astute minds also pointed out that the EU could use the threat of the backstop to effectively get the UK to cave in to all their demands in exchange for a deal so pretty much all the concessions May got as part of the WA would probably be lost, such as the fishing and even ending FOM. It was why the backstop was so controversial.
#134
Re: The EU after Brexit
Because the EU refused any discussions on the permanent trade deal until the Withdrawal Agreement had been agreed to.
Yes, logically, it should have happened alongside the WA but the EU refused to budge from their rules governing the negotiations. It might (and I use that word lightly) have been possible for the British negotiators to refuse to discuss the WA unless the EU was willing to discuss the permanent trade treaty alongside it but if that was ever possible we obviously missed the opportunity long ago.
The whole point of the Irish backstop tied to the WA is to have an insurance in case the actual deal with the EU fell through that the border would remain open. Astute minds also pointed out that the EU could use the threat of the backstop to effectively get the UK to cave in to all their demands in exchange for a deal so pretty much all the concessions May got as part of the WA would probably be lost, such as the fishing and even ending FOM. It was why the backstop was so controversial.
Yes, logically, it should have happened alongside the WA but the EU refused to budge from their rules governing the negotiations. It might (and I use that word lightly) have been possible for the British negotiators to refuse to discuss the WA unless the EU was willing to discuss the permanent trade treaty alongside it but if that was ever possible we obviously missed the opportunity long ago.
The whole point of the Irish backstop tied to the WA is to have an insurance in case the actual deal with the EU fell through that the border would remain open. Astute minds also pointed out that the EU could use the threat of the backstop to effectively get the UK to cave in to all their demands in exchange for a deal so pretty much all the concessions May got as part of the WA would probably be lost, such as the fishing and even ending FOM. It was why the backstop was so controversial.
Last edited by Millhouse; Jan 16th 2019 at 6:28 pm.