![]() |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12419121)
I used to work at EY in their liquidations team. They will be loving this and praying it’s a very complicated structure. Liquidator always gets paid first and against their headline rates. No discounts.
Export finance is always tricky, great though it is. Export finance was definitely involved, then it definitely wasn't. Then maybe. No idea what happened in the end. |
Re: Carillion
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 12419161)
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 12419161)
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. Someone with deep pockets and a decent line of credit and a touch of influence;) |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419084)
Nothing could possibly stop Unions from wading in could it?
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders. From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12419089)
Unions aren't evil by default. I find them beneficial. They just need to be regulated properly and therein lies the problem.
|
Re: Carillion
Not a surprise. They were never the same after Fish left the band.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419311)
And why shouldn't they? They're just representing their members.20,000 of them directly and how many more indirectly.
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders. From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419311)
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 12419393)
Not a surprise. They were never the same after Fish left the band.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12419903)
Titter titter (but wasn't it Phish?).
Don't think so. Could be wrong. I've now got Karma, Karma, Karma, Karma, Karma Carillion going round in my head. I blame the desert air. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12419903)
Titter titter (but wasn't it Phish?).
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Eeyore
(Post 12419994)
Phish is an American band (and name of a type of Ben & Jerry's ice cream). Derek "Fish" Dick was the lead singer of Marillion.
|
Re: Carillion
Pheck off the lot of you
|
Re: Carillion
Some of there work has already been re awarded , seen enquiries today for packages which were AFC .
Didn't take them long |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:22 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.