![]() |
Carillion
Hope nobody out here is affected by this.
Wonder if the AF link will help them here? Mental that it's liquidation not administration. Shows how deep the problems go. |
Re: Carillion
Scrap all that - just read the BB news !
|
Re: Carillion
tough reading but good to see the government let it go.
My guess is that it would have been the pensions shortfall that killed it, not the lenders. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by UKCityGent
(Post 12419025)
Hows the future looking for them ?
It is a case of being bailed out by the UK Government especially since many of their large projects are for them ? Maybe worth taking a punt - esp if they have a market cap at $61m (if you close the eyes that they have $1.5bn of liabilities!) |
Re: Carillion
Bernard Jenkin, the Conservative chairman of the House of Commons Public Administration Committee, said Carillion's collapse "really shakes public confidence in the ability of the private sector to deliver public services and infrastructure".
He said there needed to be a change of "mindset" at companies that do a lot of work for the taxpayer. "You've got to treat yourself much more as a branch of the public service, not as a private company just there to enrich the shareholders and the directors," he said. Rehana Azam, national officer of the GMB union, said: "What's happening with Carillion yet again shows the perils of allowing privatisation to run rampant in our schools, our hospitals and our prisons." Those two quotes stuck out for me. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419068)
Bernard Jenkin, the Conservative chairman of the House of Commons Public Administration Committee, said Carillion's collapse "really shakes public confidence in the ability of the private sector to deliver public services and infrastructure".
He said there needed to be a change of "mindset" at companies that do a lot of work for the taxpayer. "You've got to treat yourself much more as a branch of the public service, not as a private company just there to enrich the shareholders and the directors," he said. Rehana Azam, national officer of the GMB union, said: "What's happening with Carillion yet again shows the perils of allowing privatisation to run rampant in our schools, our hospitals and our prisons." Those two quotes stuck out for me. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419068)
[COLOR="Red"]Those two quotes stuck out for me.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419084)
Nothing could possibly stop Unions from wading in could it?
|
Re: Carillion
Major involvement in Expo 20/20 . They've committed to delivering a massive slice.
Good luck with that , interesting situation as I'm led to believe the UK finance initiative was paramount in this. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12419089)
Unions aren't evil by default. I find them beneficial. They just need to be regulated properly and therein lies the problem.
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 12419093)
Major involvement in Expo 20/20 . They've committed to delivering a massive slice.
Good luck with that , interesting situation as I'm led to believe the UK finance initiative was paramount in this. Although the export finance credits helped perhaps to secure the work, the UK did a bit of a u-turn from what I understand and not a huge amount of funding came from it in the end. In fact, barely any. We're working with them out here on a few things. |
Re: Carillion
This goes back to September but it's reassuring to know provisions were being made to keep money with those that earned it.
Carillion protected bosses’ £4m bonuses before crisis | This is Money A great day for all those that made an estimated £80m from shorting stock too. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419096)
I just find all political point scoring when something like this happens to be a bit tragic.
Exactly. Although the export finance credits helped perhaps to secure the work, the UK did a bit of a u-turn from what I understand and not a huge amount of funding came from it in the end. In fact, barely any. We're working with them out here on a few things. Many contractors walked away from it because of the size/delivery programme and wanted it split up but Carillion took the full package of that contract and committed to delivering. The cash has got to come from somewhere |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419096)
I just find all political point scoring when something like this happens to be a bit tragic.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 12419105)
I'm not sure how their ME business is set up and how it is now with AF but the amount of work they have to deliver up on Expo is massive .
Many contractors walked away from it because of the size/delivery programme and wanted it split up but Carillion took the full package of that contract and committed to delivering. The cash has got to come from somewhere 4x more than Expo was suggested for the new airport by the UK export finance. What I heard was they pulled out of the deal in the end because the client here would be disbanded and nobody else wanted to take the terms of the agreement on.
Originally Posted by Arnold S
(Post 12419106)
Indeed, screw accountability. Corbyn, Abbott, Jones we done your boys good, can you hear me Lily Allen, your boys took a hell of a beating.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419113)
Massive doesn't cover it even, it's unreal how much they have up there. 24/7 is happening.
4x more than Expo was suggested for the new airport by the UK export finance. What I heard was they pulled out of the deal in the end because the client here would be disbanded and nobody else wanted to take the terms of the agreement on. I suppose you should probably chastise EY as well for not liquidating them for free? Export finance is always tricky, great though it is. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12419121)
I used to work at EY in their liquidations team. They will be loving this and praying it’s a very complicated structure. Liquidator always gets paid first and against their headline rates. No discounts.
Export finance is always tricky, great though it is. Export finance was definitely involved, then it definitely wasn't. Then maybe. No idea what happened in the end. |
Re: Carillion
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 12419161)
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 12419161)
What a mess, hopefully no-one on here is directly affected by it or at least had the good sense to bail out a few months ago when the writing was on the wall.
Guessing on an Arabtec, CCC and partner(s) JV to come in and take over the works? Good but risky opportunity for anyone considering stepping into the breach. Someone with deep pockets and a decent line of credit and a touch of influence;) |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12419084)
Nothing could possibly stop Unions from wading in could it?
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders. From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12419089)
Unions aren't evil by default. I find them beneficial. They just need to be regulated properly and therein lies the problem.
|
Re: Carillion
Not a surprise. They were never the same after Fish left the band.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419311)
And why shouldn't they? They're just representing their members.20,000 of them directly and how many more indirectly.
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders. From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by nonthaburi
(Post 12419311)
I actually thought Bernard Jenkin's comment was more to the point. That part about public service and not just enriching the shareholders.
From a Tory too... |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by littlejimmy
(Post 12419393)
Not a surprise. They were never the same after Fish left the band.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12419903)
Titter titter (but wasn't it Phish?).
Don't think so. Could be wrong. I've now got Karma, Karma, Karma, Karma, Karma Carillion going round in my head. I blame the desert air. |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12419903)
Titter titter (but wasn't it Phish?).
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Eeyore
(Post 12419994)
Phish is an American band (and name of a type of Ben & Jerry's ice cream). Derek "Fish" Dick was the lead singer of Marillion.
|
Re: Carillion
Pheck off the lot of you
|
Re: Carillion
Some of there work has already been re awarded , seen enquiries today for packages which were AFC .
Didn't take them long |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 12420779)
Some of there work has already been re awarded , seen enquiries today for packages which were AFC .
Didn't take them long |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12420872)
Official email from the big programme is that it's business as usual. Apparently AF family group / business have been told and agreed to / with that things should not change and things should not affect the tight timescales for an international event.
|
Re: Carillion
Perhaps Qatar not paying was a strategic decision....
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 12421535)
They can't and won't say anything else . The things a catastrophic mess .
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12421551)
They're on 3-4 of our projects but Expo is the one we're least concerned about.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Pongo
(Post 12421550)
Perhaps Qatar not paying was a strategic decision....
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 12421562)
What about that one in DCH ?
The one on the palm couldn't be more of a trouble project if it tried so whether they stay or go I think is now irrelevant. :rofl: |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12421572)
Not sure to be honest.
The one on the palm couldn't be more of a trouble project if it tried so whether they stay or go I think is now irrelevant. :rofl: |
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12421577)
Sounds like my kind of project.
|
Re: Carillion
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12421578)
So you make your fortune off others' misfortunes? :sneaky:
I’d love to work in a hedge fund buying distressed stuff though. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:24 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.