AMA thread
#16
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: AMA thread
Keep the thread going.
Are you left or right handed?
#17
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,520
Re: AMA thread
Right handed
(but use my left when I .... well.... you know )
(but use my left when I .... well.... you know )
#18
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Re: AMA thread
Back on the AMA topic...
Should I put goldfish in my garden pond?
Should I put goldfish in my garden pond?
#21
Re: AMA thread
Same applies to homophobic and provocative racial comments also, though neither are quite as frequent nor as casual.
#23
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
#26
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: AMA thread
Does an EPC contractor's general obligation to supply in accordance with the EPC contract's specifications preclude his asserting force majeure in the event that he has procured a product that became contaminated further down the supply chain?
#27
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Re: AMA thread
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
#28
Re: AMA thread
No, it has two layers of protection. Firstly it is the General Conditions of Contract and not the Specifications that deal with the the matter of Force Majeure. Secondly, you can't contract out of the law, so there may well be implied terms in the Contract that deal with a Force Majeure event. Except of course if the EPC Contractor is operating in Qatar, in which case the executives risk a travel ban and jail time unless they withdraw all claims and apologise for any insult they may have caused.
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
#29
Hit 16's
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine
Posts: 13,112
Re: AMA thread
No, it has two layers of protection. Firstly it is the General Conditions of Contract and not the Specifications that deal with the the matter of Force Majeure. Secondly, you can't contract out of the law, so there may well be implied terms in the Contract that deal with a Force Majeure event. Except of course if the EPC Contractor is operating in Qatar, in which case the executives risk a travel ban and jail time unless they withdraw all claims and apologise for any insult they may have caused.
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
I'm going to run with FM, and give it a 5% chance of success.
#30
Re: AMA thread
No, it has two layers of protection. Firstly it is the General Conditions of Contract and not the Specifications that deal with the the matter of Force Majeure. Secondly, you can't contract out of the law, so there may well be implied terms in the Contract that deal with a Force Majeure event. Except of course if the EPC Contractor is operating in Qatar, in which case the executives risk a travel ban and jail time unless they withdraw all claims and apologise for any insult they may have caused.
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
Now what about my two goldfish questions?
I actually meant provisions, which are spread over both the Conditions and the Specifications; the FM provisions are in the Conditions, as are the obligations to supply in accordance with the Spec, so priority is not an issue. English law, so no implied terms in this respect. Thankfully we're not at risk here of upsetting to the point of exclusion. I was, however, made persona non gratia in Egypt for a year, which was a pleasant respite.
I'm going to run with FM, and give it a 5% chance of success.
I'm going to run with FM, and give it a 5% chance of success.
Sad fact is I actually know what you two are on about (had a contracts chap as a colleague for many years, many years ago) hence you can tell I am also a party-on type of guy!