British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Rovers Return (https://britishexpats.com/forum/rovers-return-111/)
-   -   Riots in the UK (https://britishexpats.com/forum/rovers-return-111/riots-uk-728058/)

materialcontroller Aug 10th 2011 1:53 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Dewey (Post 9550391)
Does anyone know the legality of carrying pepper gel in the UK?

Pretty certain that ALL types of incapacitant sprays & substances are classed as offensive weapons in the UK. Quite rightly too, I may add.

Longy Aug 10th 2011 3:43 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Marocco (Post 9550331)
An easier solution: make them and their families ineligible for any benefits, for life. That'll give them something else to do.

How is that going to help? Aren't they just going to steal more?

Sally Redux Aug 10th 2011 3:45 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Marocco (Post 9550331)
An easier solution: make them and their families ineligible for any benefits, for life. That'll give them something else to do.

Where is the precedent for punishing someone's family for what they do? The Bible?

Bob Aug 10th 2011 4:34 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Marocco (Post 9550331)
An easier solution: make them and their families ineligible for any benefits, for life. That'll give them something else to do.

Yeah, more crime...a lot of folks are on benefits because there isn't anything else going...

The rioters are arseholes, but that's not to say that the root causes are all of their making.

Leslie Aug 10th 2011 4:45 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 9549103)
What makes you think that? :unsure:

It's happened here before and it will happen again. Different impetus but something will kick it off and the mob will go bananas for a few days. There's nothing new under the sun.

Jerseygirl Aug 10th 2011 4:54 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 9550757)
It's happened here before and it will happen again. Different impetus but something will kick it off and the mob will go bananas for a few days. There's nothing new under the sun.

Yeah I know that but the OP insinuated that riots in the UK would spark off riots over here. I wondered why she thought that.

Bob Aug 10th 2011 5:38 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 


The real reason the riots kicked off...

Octang Frye Aug 10th 2011 5:53 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 
Despite being a left-winger, this guy nails it. Brilliant.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10970/

Karrie72 Aug 10th 2011 6:22 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Bob (Post 9550873)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0cbVW_QS2eE

The real reason the riots kicked off...

That's too funny!:rofl:

Karrie72 Aug 10th 2011 6:25 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9550906)
Despite being a left-winger, this guy nails it. Brilliant.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10970/

Excellent article:thumbup:

Leslie Aug 10th 2011 6:31 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 9550780)
Yeah I know that but the OP insinuated that riots in the UK would spark off riots over here. I wondered why she thought that.

Not gonna happen.

another bloody yank Aug 10th 2011 7:35 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 9550978)
Not gonna happen.

You will never see that level of destruction here.


TV: "And we'll be right back with...

Rioter: *Runs out the door, down the street, throws a rock in the general direction of the local 7-11, flips off a police car he sees speeding down the street a block over, runs back home, panting, falls in his laz-e-boy just as...

TV: "Welcome back to America's got Talent!"

Jerseygirl Aug 10th 2011 7:46 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 9550978)
Not gonna happen.

Exactly. Just thought it was an odd statement to make.

Leslie Aug 10th 2011 8:05 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 9551127)
Exactly. Just thought it was an odd statement to make.

Nobody riots when unarmed drug dealers get shot by the police here ... why would they riot when it happens overseas?

robin1234 Aug 10th 2011 8:07 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 
:sneaky

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9550906)
Despite being a left-winger, this guy nails it. Brilliant.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10970/

Brendan O'Neill may have been a left-winger once but he sure isn't now. He wants to blame the welfare state for the riots and a supposed break down in traditional social bonds. Completely unconvincing.

paulward50 Aug 10th 2011 8:09 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9548874)
I don't think it's that simple. While I'm sure many of the rioters are just using this as an excuse to riot and loot and cause mischief, there are other factors at play here.

I'm not condoning the rioters actions, but it was pretty obvious something like this was coming. Perceived cuts in the welfare state, unemployment, racial tensions, growing gap between the richest and poorest incomes, liberal education policies which have failed the kids, producing a generation of under-educated, unskilled people dependent on government hand-outs.

Let's look at the problem with the Met. It appears the police killed Duggan when he was not a threat and then tried to cover it up. Yes, the guy was not a choirboy, but that does not merit police execution.
The police are the largest armed gang operating in the UK, have a monopoly on force, and they act with impunity. I can cite numerous examples where they abuse their power and there are no repercussions. Corruption, blatant cover-ups etc. from Jean Charles de Menezes, Ian Tomlinson/Simon Harwood, the custody sergeant who threw the lady headfirst onto the concrete. I could go on and on.

You know me and you know that I think Britain became a police state a while back. I sympathize with blacks in London after they get stopped and searched time after time, living under constant surveillance. This would make me angry too.

I agree that destroying your own neighborhood is sheer idiocy, and I feel for the people who have lost their livelihoods and their homes. The same thing happened in LA, where the predominantly black population destroyed its own infrastructure. It's crazy.

Britain is still obsessed with class. Typical newspaper article will include the following - blah blah, said Mr Area Man in his 350,000 pound detached house with a Jaguar and a "4x4" parked in the driveway.
And a lot of British people are envious or resentful of others' success.
As an example, listen to these geniuses:

"Showing the rich people we can do what we want"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424

I'm not racist but Stats don't lie. Blacks are involed in more crime than Whites, therefore they will will stopped and searched more. Same in the US.

Giantaxe Aug 10th 2011 8:45 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by robin1234 (Post 9551166)
:sneaky

Brendan O'Neill may have been a left-winger once but he sure isn't now. He wants to blame the welfare state for the riots and a supposed break down in traditional social bonds. Completely unconvincing.

It's a fair enough hypothesis but he does little to back it up in that article. I thought it was very poorly argued.

Jerseygirl Aug 10th 2011 8:55 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 9551164)
Nobody riots when unarmed drug dealers get shot by the police here ... why would they riot when it happens overseas?

Exactly.

Lothianlad Aug 10th 2011 9:22 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 
22:20 hours BST Wednesday 10/08/11

All quiet on the Western Front. Latest police reports from across England* indicate no incidents of civil disorder or criminal activity on anything like the scale of the past few nights whatsoever, anywhere in the UK. Hopefully the war is over, but meanwhile the courts in London are operating day and night 24/7 dealing with all the cases of arrest bought before them by the police. One such case involved a man of 30, caught looting from a damaged shop, and who turned out to be employed at a primary school in London - not sure yet whether or not he is a teacher. Hopefully not! :eek:

*Only England has been affected by all these troubles. Even down to attractive places like Gloucester, but it seems that there is a substantial immigrant/ethnic (mostly Asian but also Afro Caribbean) population there.

lyonsden1193 Aug 10th 2011 10:10 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Lothianlad (Post 9551351)
22:20 hours BST Wednesday 10/08/11

One such case involved a man of 30, caught looting from a damaged shop, and who turned out to be employed at a primary school in London - not sure yet whether or not he is a teacher. Hopefully not! :eek:

Why hopefully not?? any profession that allows its members to purchase Citroen Dyanes and jesus boots must be up for a bit of looting!:)

Sorry just looked at your age ... you might not remember the upside down prams(Citreons)

tonrob Aug 10th 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Jerseygirl (Post 9551127)
Exactly. Just thought it was an odd statement to make.

OP has a history of popping here occasionally to post odd and seemingly ill-thought out statements and then not bothering to follow up when challenged. I would also highly doubt that he will respond to any questions about his newer post on this thread that seems to condone racial profiling.

Hold on - I'll give it a whirl...

tonrob Aug 10th 2011 4:52 pm

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by paulward50 (Post 9551170)
I'm not racist but Stats don't lie. Blacks are involed in more crime than Whites, therefore they will will stopped and searched more. Same in the US.

What in God's good name are you on about, man? :confused:

Tarkak9 Aug 10th 2011 5:23 pm

Re: Riots in the UK
 
OMG.... The riots have spread to Ireland!
Paddy smashed his computer screen up trying to nick a pair of trainers from eBay.

Steerpike Aug 10th 2011 9:38 pm

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9550906)
Despite being a left-winger, this guy nails it. Brilliant.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10970/

Interesting article, but - in Oakland, CA, the black community rioted in their own back yard recently over the issue of the cop who killed the black guy on the BART station. They trashed the very community they grew up and lived in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BART_Po...of_Oscar_Grant

Maybe people riot where they are comfortable - where they know what to trash, and where to run.

paulward50 Aug 11th 2011 12:53 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by tonrob (Post 9551982)
What in God's good name are you on about, man? :confused:

If you read the full quote, I was replying to the lady that wrote she feels sorry for Black people who get stopped and searched all the time in London.

Leslie Aug 11th 2011 4:24 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by paulward50 (Post 9552647)
If you read the full quote, I was replying to the lady that wrote she feels sorry for Black people who get stopped and searched all the time in London.

That was no lady.

Octang Frye Aug 11th 2011 4:51 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 
When people tweet from Libya, it's good enough for us to send in the military. When people tweet pictures of Basij thugs in Iran, we support them and decry attempts to shut them down.

When rioting breaks out in England, Cameron says services such as Twitter and Blackberry Messenger could be shut down "to avoid co-ordinated unrest".
Are you kidding me?

randomgirl Aug 11th 2011 4:55 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9553062)
When people tweet from Libya, it's good enough for us to send in the military. When people tweet pictures of Basij thugs in Iran, we support them and decry attempts to shut them down.

When rioting breaks out in England, Cameron says services such as Twitter and Blackberry Messenger could be shut down "to avoid co-ordinated unrest".
Are you kidding me?

Couldn't agree more!! The government needs to get a backbone and deal with the yobs appropriately - they have to get tough on them or it will only happen again! I just read a news report that stated a guy who assaulted a police officer (tried to gouge his eyes out, no less!) was jailed for just 20 weeks (I thought assaulting police was a major crime, obviously not!). Meanwhile, someone who stole £175 worth of clothes was jailed for 8 months. :huh:

Leslie Aug 11th 2011 5:32 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9553062)
When people tweet from Libya, it's good enough for us to send in the military. When people tweet pictures of Basij thugs in Iran, we support them and decry attempts to shut them down.

When rioting breaks out in England, Cameron says services such as Twitter and Blackberry Messenger could be shut down "to avoid co-ordinated unrest".
Are you kidding me?

I agree. Very disturbing.

Octang Frye Aug 11th 2011 6:08 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 
Ugh, it's the typical UK mindset. More legislation! Curtail freedoms!
From dangerous dogs to gun control, a litany of knee-jerk legislation.

It's the only way the politicians can show how outraged they are!
Morons.

materialcontroller Aug 11th 2011 7:22 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9553219)
Ugh, it's the typical UK mindset. More legislation! Curtail freedoms!
From dangerous dogs to gun control, a litany of knee-jerk legislation.

It's the only way the politicians can show how outraged they are!
Morons.

Respectfully, the current legislation regarding issues such as dangerous dogs or gun controls tend to be widely supported by the UK population. You won't find many people here trying to argue that having guns or dangerous dogs are "rights" which must be protected, or that any legislation to the contrary is an erosion of "freedoms". Despite the recent trouble the UK still has a far more civic minded society than the USA, and measures like these are considered very carefully before being implemented. It's far from being a haphazard knee-jerk response by desperate politicians. They invariably carry the will of the people on such matters.

Furthermore the very first e-petition to attract 100,000 signatures on the British government's website, and therefore becoming eligible to be debated in parliament, is one calling for rioters to lose access to all state benefits. This is the very essence of democracy at work, akin to Switzerland and it's unique system of direct democracy. There may be many things wrong with the UK, but "more legislation" isn't one of them!!! :)

Giantaxe Aug 11th 2011 7:36 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by materialcontroller (Post 9553352)
Respectfully, the current legislation regarding issues such as dangerous dogs or gun controls tend to be widely supported by the UK population. You won't find many people here trying to argue that having guns or dangerous dogs are "rights" which must be protected, or that any legislation to the contrary is an erosion of "freedoms". Despite the recent trouble the UK still has a far more civic minded society than the USA, and measures like these are considered very carefully before being implemented. It's far from being a haphazard knee-jerk response by desperate politicians. They invariably carry the will of the people on such matters.

In general, I think the British are way too flippant about giving up rights under the perception that in return they will get more security. It's funny how latter doesn't always follow from the former though.

UK more civic-minded than the US - how are you measuring that? I don't think your statement is obviously true at all.

tonrob Aug 11th 2011 7:36 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by paulward50 (Post 9552647)
If you read the full quote, I was replying to the lady that wrote she feels sorry for Black people who get stopped and searched all the time in London.

And if you read my post, I wasn't asking her what the dickens she was on about. :rolleyes:

materialcontroller Aug 11th 2011 7:44 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 9553388)
In general, I think the British are way too flippant about giving up rights under the perception that in return they will get more security. It's funny how latter doesn't always follow from the former though.

UK more civic-minded than the US - how are you measuring that? I don't think your statement is obviously true at all.

The statement about a civic-minded society is my own personal opinion, based on my belief that British people are far more inclined to seek solutions through their elected representatives in councils and government. Now I appreciate that this also happens in the USA but overall, as a bit of a generalisation, people in the US tend to be more individualistic and see government as part of the problem rather than the solution.

I'd be interested to hear you expand on your idea that the British are too flippant to give up rights for the perception of greater security, and where you feel this has had detrimental effects.

Giantaxe Aug 11th 2011 8:05 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by materialcontroller (Post 9553406)
The statement about a civic-minded society is my own personal opinion, based on my belief that British people are far more inclined to seek solutions through their elected representatives in councils and government. Now I appreciate that this also happens in the USA but overall, as a bit of a generalisation, people in the US tend to be more individualistic and see government as part of the problem rather than the solution.

I think you are incorrect to assume that a more "civic-minded" society is one that necessarily seeks its solutions through government. There are many ways that a society could be construed as being civic-minded including, for example, volunteerism and philanthropy, two areas where the US is ahead of the UK imo.


Originally Posted by materialcontroller (Post 9553406)
I'd be interested to hear you expand on your idea that the British are too flippant to give up rights for the perception of greater security, and where you feel this has had detrimental effects.

The lack of opposition to the modification of the common-law right to remain silent comes to mind - a principle enshrined since the early middle ages. The retention of DNA of anyone arrested as opposed to those convicted of an offence (although I think the European Court of Justics may have overturned that one). And the sprouting of security cameras in every major city and town, with increasing reliance made on them by the police instead of having actual police out in the street.

Lothianlad Aug 11th 2011 8:21 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by materialcontroller (Post 9553352)
Despite the recent trouble the UK still has a far more civic minded society than the USA...

As a resident of the UK from the very moment of birth right up until the present moment in time I have to take issue with you there.....I really don't think that the British people as a whole are all that civic minded. My step father is a City Councillor back home in Edinburgh and he is often moaning about apathy and lack of concern for local issues generallly among the residents of his particular ward - until issues arise which directly affect them..Aside from that the majority of residents couldn't give a tinker's cuss what happens - again, so long as it doesn't actually impinge on their lives.

Nationwide, taking in the UK as a whole, turnout at local elections is always very low....sometimes as low as 15 to 20% of the electorate, and even in General Elections the average turnout across the board is just around 60% to 65% and in each succeeding General Election the turnout is down a wee bit more. In European elections it is very much lower.

The UK has a massive problem with litter and in spite of there being a profusion of litter bins and waste disposal units at strategic positions all over public areas too many people either do not see them for want of looking, or see them but think they are something other than litter bins, such as convenient places on which to perch themselves while they scoff their takeaways or fish and chips and subsequently decorate the entire surrounds with what remains once the nosh has been consumed....the poly containers and paper wrappings and empty cans of Stella or bottles of Sprite or even voddy. Hardly civic minded - it's all very much related to the attitude displayed by all the scumbags causing all the mayhem in many of England's* urban and metro areas.

*Specifically England. Scotland has not really been affected, and in Wales only a few pissheads/copycat scumbags caused minor problems, in spite of the fact that this city his home to large numbers of immigrants and ethnic people. It's veen very much an English "party cum rampage" on those three nights...and days.

Lothianlad Aug 11th 2011 8:40 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Octang Frye (Post 9550906)
Despite being a left-winger, this guy nails it. Brilliant.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10970/

The chickens have now come home to roost good and proper on the streets of urban Britannia......it is now harvest time in Britain.....the seeds sown by Governments (predominantly that from 1997 to 2010 and all of its insane policies and the limitless supply of welfare benefits to the feral and the feckless and the over fecund of both genders plus the craziness of political correctness and the sharp decline of social values, family values, educational standards, basic respect and codes of behaviour) have now all come to fruition in all their savage glory........and the ******* BB(B)C - British (Biased) Broadcasting Corporation - refuses to acknowledge that the present Government is now left to pick up the pieces and to heal the wounds of a chronically sick and expanding section of society in this country.....according to many journalists and current affairs presenters at the bloody Beeb it's all the new Government's fault! :curse:

randomgirl Aug 11th 2011 8:46 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Lothianlad (Post 9553517)
The chickens have now ome to roost good and proper on the streets of urban Britannia......it is now harvest time in Britain.....the seeds sown by Governments (predominantly that from 1997 to 2010 and all of its insane policies and the limitless supply of welfare benefits to the feral and the feckless and the over fecund of both genders plus the craziness of political correctness and the sharp decline of social values, family values, educational standards, basic respect and codes of behaviour) have now all come to fruition in all their savage glory........and the ******* BB(B)C - British (Biased) Broadcasting Corporation - refuses to acknowledge that the present Government is now left to pick up the pieces and to heal the wounds of a chronically sick and expanding section of society in this country.....according to many journalists and current affairs presenters at the bloody Beeb it's all the new Government's fault! :curse:

I agree, previous governments have been way too soft when it comes to dealing with the yobs and they've basically encouraged their behaviour, making excuses for them instead of sorting the problems out. A big part of the reason these idiots went on this rampage seems to be largely because they could - the yobs have been getting away with things for so long that they think they can do whatever they please, and of course the world owes them something (ha!). Unfortunately it seems they were pretty much right, because they were able to continue with their crap for far too long.

materialcontroller Aug 11th 2011 8:47 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 9553443)
I think you are incorrect to assume that a more "civic-minded" society is one that necessarily seeks its solutions through government. There are many ways that a society could be construed as being civic-minded including, for example, volunteerism and philanthropy, two areas where the US is ahead of the UK imo.

Well I'm not sure about figures for either, but those are very good and valid points. You should however note the marked increase of the UK voluntary sector (aka The "Big Society"), as well as the huge amount of charitable donations made in the UK every year.


Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 9553443)
The lack of opposition to the modification of the common-law right to remain silent comes to mind - a principle enshrined since the early middle ages. The retention of DNA of anyone arrested as opposed to those convicted of an offence (although I think the European Court of Justics may have overturned that one). And the sprouting of security cameras in every major city and town, with increasing reliance made on them by the police instead of having actual police out in the street.

Modifying the right to remain silent can be seen as a necessary evolution, rather than something revolutionary. It was widely believed that criminals were abusing the right to remain silent both when being questioned by police, and at their subsequent trials. Just because something has been in place "since the early middle ages" does not mean that it remains relevant today. In fact, it is the sign of a mature and democratic society that these things are reviewed and amended as necessary. Contrast that with the USA and it's reliance on a 200-odd year old written "constitution" which, it could be argued, is now outdated and no longer serves the best interests of "the people".

Retention of arrestees DNA by the police was challenged successfully in the ECHR. I think this shows that British people aren't at all flippant about surrending freedoms. They will fight for principles that are deemed to be unfair. In this regard, also note the widespread opposition to ID cards (coupled with a pervasive national database) and the embarrassing backtrack by the last Labour administration.

Security cameras are regulated by law, and they've played their part in the reduction of crime, as well as the speedier identification and apprehension of offenders. In fact, those very same CCTV systems are proving invaluable right now, as the police forces of England struggle to arrest the hundreds of people responsible for the large scale outbreaks of violence we've seen recently. The only people who should be worried about CCTV are wrongdoers.

materialcontroller Aug 11th 2011 8:52 am

Re: Riots in the UK
 

Originally Posted by Lothianlad (Post 9553479)
As a resident of the UK from the very moment of birth right up until the present moment in time I have to take issue with you there.....

A thought provoking piece Lothianlad. But apart from telling us what you think is wrong with Britain, oops sorry I mean ENGLAND, how does all of that compare to my earlier point that Britain is a less individualistic society than the USA?


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:53 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.