USA going after Iran now
Nov 20th 2004, 12:44 am
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>Bali off the hook they are mostly Hindu. Just on cultural grounds I
>would like to exempt the Taj Mahal even if it is of Muslim origin.
F the Taj Mahal, blow that up too.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>would like to exempt the Taj Mahal even if it is of Muslim origin.
F the Taj Mahal, blow that up too.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 20th 2004, 12:46 am
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>Right! ARKy is back to nuking Pakistan, India, & Indonesia. We will
>need to take out a part of China as well. That could get tricky it
>might piss off their government and they might foreclose on the US.
Maybe China could just push the bastards out over the Himalayas. The Chinese
tend to keep their population walking the straight and narrow. We will let them
handle their own Muslim problem.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>need to take out a part of China as well. That could get tricky it
>might piss off their government and they might foreclose on the US.
Maybe China could just push the bastards out over the Himalayas. The Chinese
tend to keep their population walking the straight and narrow. We will let them
handle their own Muslim problem.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 20th 2004, 1:03 am
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>. ..
> Robert writes:
>
> > If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
> > Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
> > enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
>
> It's not good enough for the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can
> declare war.
GI Joe gonna kick those Persians right in the ****. In the ****, I
say. In the ****.
--Bryan, see whatchya get when you x-post to alt.punk? ****
> Robert writes:
>
> > If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
> > Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
> > enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
>
> It's not good enough for the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can
> declare war.
GI Joe gonna kick those Persians right in the ****. In the ****, I
say. In the ****.
--Bryan, see whatchya get when you x-post to alt.punk? ****
Nov 20th 2004, 1:51 am
#124
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA writes:
> Maybe I knw someone at one of the top secret labs.
No, you don't.
> They said the sound barrier couldnt be broken and that the atom couldnt be
> split, but it was done. You put enough money into it anything can be done.
> Maybe something could target specific DNA prints.
Nobody is doing that today.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Maybe I knw someone at one of the top secret labs.
No, you don't.
> They said the sound barrier couldnt be broken and that the atom couldnt be
> split, but it was done. You put enough money into it anything can be done.
> Maybe something could target specific DNA prints.
Nobody is doing that today.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 20th 2004, 3:45 am
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
In article <[email protected]>, Deep Frayed
Morgues <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:43:23 GMT, "Frank F. Matthews"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Robert wrote:
>
> >>
> >> If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
> >> Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
> >> enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
> >
> >
> >Bullshit Robert. When has it be required that you be sheep to be Loyal
> >Americans? Besides Shrub is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces
> >he certainly isn't mine. As to Rummy if he cannot manage to run one war
> >with proper support for the troops why let him have another place to
> >play? Powell has, at least eventually, had enough sense to get out.
>
> Didn't Powell recently say Iran is in the process of making a
> deployable nuclear weapon or something? He was probably the only one
> with a semblance of sense in his skull, and even that was severely
> dented.
After Powell's show and tell at the UN, he has the credibility of a
crank dealer. What's he going to do? Give us another slide show? Who is
going to believe him besides those with profound dementia or worse?
E. K.
>
> Bow down, America, your government needs your obedience now more than
> ever.
> ---
> DFM
--
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003
"Too many good docs are getting out of business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able
to practice their love with women all across this country."- George W. Bush,
9/6/04
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
Morgues <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:43:23 GMT, "Frank F. Matthews"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Robert wrote:
>
> >>
> >> If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
> >> Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
> >> enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
> >
> >
> >Bullshit Robert. When has it be required that you be sheep to be Loyal
> >Americans? Besides Shrub is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces
> >he certainly isn't mine. As to Rummy if he cannot manage to run one war
> >with proper support for the troops why let him have another place to
> >play? Powell has, at least eventually, had enough sense to get out.
>
> Didn't Powell recently say Iran is in the process of making a
> deployable nuclear weapon or something? He was probably the only one
> with a semblance of sense in his skull, and even that was severely
> dented.
After Powell's show and tell at the UN, he has the credibility of a
crank dealer. What's he going to do? Give us another slide show? Who is
going to believe him besides those with profound dementia or worse?
E. K.
>
> Bow down, America, your government needs your obedience now more than
> ever.
> ---
> DFM
--
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003
"Too many good docs are getting out of business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able
to practice their love with women all across this country."- George W. Bush,
9/6/04
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
Nov 20th 2004, 4:14 am
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
You really do need to try for some reality. Saudis are primarily Sunni
while Iranians are primarily Shia. Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
ARKADYA wrote:
>>Go back to reality again. It is clear that 9/11 was developed and
>>executed by Saudis not by Iranians.
>
>
> They are both fanatical Muslims. They are both on the same side and against the
> west. The only difference is geography
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
while Iranians are primarily Shia. Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
ARKADYA wrote:
>>Go back to reality again. It is clear that 9/11 was developed and
>>executed by Saudis not by Iranians.
>
>
> They are both fanatical Muslims. They are both on the same side and against the
> west. The only difference is geography
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
Nov 20th 2004, 4:17 am
#127
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA wrote:
>>Right! ARKy is back to nuking Pakistan, India, & Indonesia. We will
>>need to take out a part of China as well. That could get tricky it
>>might piss off their government and they might foreclose on the US.
>
>
> Maybe China could just push the bastards out over the Himalayas. The Chinese
> tend to keep their population walking the straight and narrow. We will let them
> handle their own Muslim problem.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
So now you are willing to ignore some Muslims as long as they are hiding
in powerful countries. Well that is a start at some reality impinging
on your paranoia. As to pushing them out the Chinese are more likely to
take advantage of the opportunity to add territory.
>>Right! ARKy is back to nuking Pakistan, India, & Indonesia. We will
>>need to take out a part of China as well. That could get tricky it
>>might piss off their government and they might foreclose on the US.
>
>
> Maybe China could just push the bastards out over the Himalayas. The Chinese
> tend to keep their population walking the straight and narrow. We will let them
> handle their own Muslim problem.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
So now you are willing to ignore some Muslims as long as they are hiding
in powerful countries. Well that is a start at some reality impinging
on your paranoia. As to pushing them out the Chinese are more likely to
take advantage of the opportunity to add territory.
Nov 20th 2004, 4:18 am
#128
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA wrote:
>>Bali off the hook they are mostly Hindu. Just on cultural grounds I
>>would like to exempt the Taj Mahal even if it is of Muslim origin.
>
>
> F the Taj Mahal, blow that up too.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
So now ARKy is becoming one with the Talaban.
>>Bali off the hook they are mostly Hindu. Just on cultural grounds I
>>would like to exempt the Taj Mahal even if it is of Muslim origin.
>
>
> F the Taj Mahal, blow that up too.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
So now ARKy is becoming one with the Talaban.
Nov 20th 2004, 4:19 am
#129
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Sabryna Chrestwood wrote:
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>. ..
>
>>Robert writes:
>>>If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
>>>Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
>>>enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
>>It's not good enough for the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can
>>declare war.
>
>
> GI Joe gonna kick those Persians right in the ****. In the ****, I
> say. In the ****.
>
> --Bryan, see whatchya get when you x-post to alt.punk? ****
Alas GI Joe is busy getting the preteens ready to join the army to
support the Iraq war. There won't be forces to go elsewhere for years.
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>. ..
>
>>Robert writes:
>>>If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
>>>Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
>>>enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
>>It's not good enough for the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can
>>declare war.
>
>
> GI Joe gonna kick those Persians right in the ****. In the ****, I
> say. In the ****.
>
> --Bryan, see whatchya get when you x-post to alt.punk? ****
Alas GI Joe is busy getting the preteens ready to join the army to
support the Iraq war. There won't be forces to go elsewhere for years.
Nov 20th 2004, 5:49 am
#130
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>Saudis are primarily Sunni
>while Iranians are primarily Shia
They agree on more then they disagree.
>Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
>arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
Same crap. They all pray with their asses in the air. They are both towelheaded
backward ass idiots that dont deserve to be differentiated. Dont they all
worship MUhhamed the swine?
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>while Iranians are primarily Shia
They agree on more then they disagree.
>Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
>arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
Same crap. They all pray with their asses in the air. They are both towelheaded
backward ass idiots that dont deserve to be differentiated. Dont they all
worship MUhhamed the swine?
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 20th 2004, 6:22 am
#131
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
"Arizona Bushwhacker" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<Ye6nd.149559$hj.54364@fed1read07>...
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
> > Max Mustermann wrote:
> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> > >
> >
> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
Hate to burst your bubble genius, but in this case it's your heroes,
the Europeans, who are leading the charge against Iranian nukes. If
you've got a problem with the evidence of Iranian nukes then you
better start protesting Chirac and Schroeder.
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
> > Max Mustermann wrote:
> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> > >
> >
> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
Hate to burst your bubble genius, but in this case it's your heroes,
the Europeans, who are leading the charge against Iranian nukes. If
you've got a problem with the evidence of Iranian nukes then you
better start protesting Chirac and Schroeder.
Nov 20th 2004, 7:36 am
#132
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
> >>
> >> Been to a red state lately...?
> >
> > I live in one.
>
>
> Well then... don't kerry, be happy :-)
I'll do both and like it, thank you very much.
says...
> >>
> >> Been to a red state lately...?
> >
> > I live in one.
>
>
> Well then... don't kerry, be happy :-)
I'll do both and like it, thank you very much.
Nov 20th 2004, 8:39 am
#133
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA wrote:
>>Saudis are primarily Sunni
>>while Iranians are primarily Shia
>
>
> They agree on more then they disagree.
>
>
>>Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
>>arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
>
>
> Same crap. They all pray with their asses in the air. They are both towelheaded
> backward ass idiots that dont deserve to be differentiated. Dont they all
> worship MUhhamed the swine?
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
Oh dear you do need a good bit more education. They do not worship
Mohammed they simply view him as the last of the prophets. The god that
they worship is the same god as the one that Christians and Jews
worship. They do deny the divinity of Jesus and simply view him as the
next to the last major prophet. As to the method of praying it does
tend to resemble Catholics and Buddhists. Although they do not use a
full prostrations do some of the latter.
>>Saudis are primarily Sunni
>>while Iranians are primarily Shia
>
>
> They agree on more then they disagree.
>
>
>>Saudis are Arabs Iranians are not
>>arabic. Their varieties of fanaticism are incompatible.
>
>
> Same crap. They all pray with their asses in the air. They are both towelheaded
> backward ass idiots that dont deserve to be differentiated. Dont they all
> worship MUhhamed the swine?
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
>
>
>
Oh dear you do need a good bit more education. They do not worship
Mohammed they simply view him as the last of the prophets. The god that
they worship is the same god as the one that Christians and Jews
worship. They do deny the divinity of Jesus and simply view him as the
next to the last major prophet. As to the method of praying it does
tend to resemble Catholics and Buddhists. Although they do not use a
full prostrations do some of the latter.
Nov 20th 2004, 9:06 pm
#134
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
On 20 Nov 2004 11:22:25 -0800, [email protected] (Cyrakis) wrote:
>"Arizona Bushwhacker" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<Ye6nd.149559$hj.54364@fed1read07>...
>> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>> > Max Mustermann wrote:
>> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>> > >
>> >
>> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>>
>> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>>
>> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
>> is up to for a New York minute!
>Hate to burst your bubble genius, but in this case it's your heroes,
>the Europeans, who are leading the charge against Iranian nukes. If
>you've got a problem with the evidence of Iranian nukes then you
>better start protesting Chirac and Schroeder.
They are leading the charge in a bid to show America that hard
diplomacy can work in keeping countries under control. Certainly
diplomacy has yielded a much better success rate that the military
approach.
Unfortunately it involves politicians actually having to work, and
thus the military option is more attractive. With the military
approach, civilians and the army pay the price, not the politicians
who are smart enough to have nothing to do with it.
---
DFM
>"Arizona Bushwhacker" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<Ye6nd.149559$hj.54364@fed1read07>...
>> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>> > Max Mustermann wrote:
>> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>> > >
>> >
>> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>>
>> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>>
>> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
>> is up to for a New York minute!
>Hate to burst your bubble genius, but in this case it's your heroes,
>the Europeans, who are leading the charge against Iranian nukes. If
>you've got a problem with the evidence of Iranian nukes then you
>better start protesting Chirac and Schroeder.
They are leading the charge in a bid to show America that hard
diplomacy can work in keeping countries under control. Certainly
diplomacy has yielded a much better success rate that the military
approach.
Unfortunately it involves politicians actually having to work, and
thus the military option is more attractive. With the military
approach, civilians and the army pay the price, not the politicians
who are smart enough to have nothing to do with it.
---
DFM
Nov 20th 2004, 11:52 pm
#135
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>They are leading the charge in a bid to show America that hard
>diplomacy can work in keeping countries under contro
Thats a joke right? Diplomacy will never work with psychos like Iran. What are
the Europeans going to do then? Maybe send a tough letter 17 times like they
did with Iraq? It would actually be funny to see Europeans trying to mount an
actual war. I would suppose it would be like the keystone cops in action. The
Iranians would mop the floor with them. No I suppose the US would have to bail
them out once again as usual.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>diplomacy can work in keeping countries under contro
Thats a joke right? Diplomacy will never work with psychos like Iran. What are
the Europeans going to do then? Maybe send a tough letter 17 times like they
did with Iraq? It would actually be funny to see Europeans trying to mount an
actual war. I would suppose it would be like the keystone cops in action. The
Iranians would mop the floor with them. No I suppose the US would have to bail
them out once again as usual.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
