US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
Aug 6th 2006 | 12:31 am
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
Aug 6th 2006 | 12:56 am
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Aug 6th 2006 | 2:15 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>even.
Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
generalised term of abuse.
I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
he is dishonest.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>even.
Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
generalised term of abuse.
I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
he is dishonest.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
Aug 6th 2006 | 3:10 am
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>>even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you have
to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>>even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you have
to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
Aug 6th 2006 | 3:14 am
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
snip
> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
of 'free speech". In that case you are stuck with him
news:[email protected]...
snip
> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
of 'free speech". In that case you are stuck with him
Aug 6th 2006 | 3:34 am
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>snip
>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.
>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>of 'free speech".
Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.
> In that case you are stuck with him
Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>snip
>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.
>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>of 'free speech".
Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.
> In that case you are stuck with him
Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
Aug 6th 2006 | 3:45 am
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>snip
>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> great deal more.
>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>>of 'free speech".
> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> on usenet.
>> In that case you are stuck with him
> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> nutters.
> --
> PB
Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle. Be
prepared to be so so envious.
news:[email protected]...
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>snip
>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> great deal more.
>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>>of 'free speech".
> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> on usenet.
>> In that case you are stuck with him
> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> nutters.
> --
> PB
Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle. Be
prepared to be so so envious.
Aug 6th 2006 | 9:19 am
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
He is OT in the Europe travel group, but so are constantly 3 to 4 others and
padraig never complains.
Why him ???
I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
him !
"John Rennie" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
> "Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>snip
>>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
>>>> you.
>> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
>> great deal more.
>>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
>>>abrogation
>>>of 'free speech".
>> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
>> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
>> on usenet.
>>> In that case you are stuck with him
>> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
>> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
>> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
>> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
>> nutters.
>> --
>> PB
> Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
> Be prepared to be so so envious.
>
padraig never complains.
Why him ???
I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
him !
"John Rennie" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
> "Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>snip
>>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
>>>> you.
>> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
>> great deal more.
>>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
>>>abrogation
>>>of 'free speech".
>> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
>> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
>> on usenet.
>>> In that case you are stuck with him
>> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
>> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
>> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
>> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
>> nutters.
>> --
>> PB
> Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
> Be prepared to be so so envious.
>
Aug 6th 2006 | 10:54 am
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
> >
> >What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
> >machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
> >was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
> >
> >It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
> >even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
Earl and Donna are gone so he turns his attentions to rte....
--
Best
Greg
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
> >
> >What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
> >machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
> >was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
> >
> >It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
> >even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
Earl and Donna are gone so he turns his attentions to rte....
--
Best
Greg
Aug 6th 2006 | 10:56 am
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
gRunge bored us with:
> He is OT in the Europe travel group, but so are constantly 3 to 4 others and
> padraig never complains.
> Why him ???
> I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
> him !
Stop whingeing gRunge, no one "cares" what you "think"...
--
Best
Greg
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
> >
> > "Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>news:[email protected]...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>snip
> >>>
> >>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
> >>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
> >>>> you.
> >>>>
> >> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> >> great deal more.
> >>
> >>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
> >>>abrogation
> >>>of 'free speech".
> >>>
> >> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> >> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> >> on usenet.
> >>
> >>> In that case you are stuck with him
> >>>
> >> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> >> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> >> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> >>
> >> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> >> nutters.
> >>
> >> --
> >> PB
> >
> > Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
> > Be prepared to be so so envious.
> >
> He is OT in the Europe travel group, but so are constantly 3 to 4 others and
> padraig never complains.
> Why him ???
> I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
> him !
Stop whingeing gRunge, no one "cares" what you "think"...
--
Best
Greg
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
> >
> > "Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>news:[email protected]...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>snip
> >>>
> >>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
> >>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
> >>>> you.
> >>>>
> >> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> >> great deal more.
> >>
> >>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
> >>>abrogation
> >>>of 'free speech".
> >>>
> >> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> >> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> >> on usenet.
> >>
> >>> In that case you are stuck with him
> >>>
> >> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> >> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> >> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> >>
> >> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> >> nutters.
> >>
> >> --
> >> PB
> >
> > Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
> > Be prepared to be so so envious.
> >
Aug 6th 2006 | 11:34 am
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
Dave Frightens Me wrote:
> On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
> What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
> machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
> was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
> It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
> even.
No need to try and "discredit" the left, DFM, in the case of Israel
they do it to themselves EVERY single day...
The leftist mainstream media lie and Lie and LIE about Israel on a
daily basis, They swallow the most absurd Arab propaganda and
dispense it as "facts". If you do a little digging you'll find there
was no Qana "massacre", there was no Haditha "massacre", there was no
Gaza beach picnic "massacre"...all these things were cynically staged
by the Arabs to elicit cheap sympathy from gullible people. Still
another reason why I consider ALL Arabs to be contemptible cheats and
liars...
--
Best
Greg
> On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
> What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
> machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
> was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
> It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
> even.
No need to try and "discredit" the left, DFM, in the case of Israel
they do it to themselves EVERY single day...
The leftist mainstream media lie and Lie and LIE about Israel on a
daily basis, They swallow the most absurd Arab propaganda and
dispense it as "facts". If you do a little digging you'll find there
was no Qana "massacre", there was no Haditha "massacre", there was no
Gaza beach picnic "massacre"...all these things were cynically staged
by the Arabs to elicit cheap sympathy from gullible people. Still
another reason why I consider ALL Arabs to be contemptible cheats and
liars...
--
Best
Greg
Aug 6th 2006 | 2:12 pm
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>>even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think
Whenever you begin a comment with the words "I think," we are assured that
what will follow will be the most ignorant, the most craven, the most banal,
the most prurient, the most bilious, the most insipid, the most uneducated, the
most fatuous, the most pejoratively content-empty comment we can imagine.
> he should **** off.
And... away we go....
> He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
Heh.... you started it, PB. It appears you are still looking for friends to
support your troll.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>>What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>>machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>>was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>>It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>>even.
> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
> generalised term of abuse.
> I think
Whenever you begin a comment with the words "I think," we are assured that
what will follow will be the most ignorant, the most craven, the most banal,
the most prurient, the most bilious, the most insipid, the most uneducated, the
most fatuous, the most pejoratively content-empty comment we can imagine.
> he should **** off.
And... away we go....
> He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
> he is dishonest.
Heh.... you started it, PB. It appears you are still looking for friends to
support your troll.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
Aug 6th 2006 | 4:29 pm
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Padraig Breathnach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>snip
>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> great deal more.
>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>>of 'free speech".
> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> on usenet.
You don't use your brain, either, PB. A bit of advice from the ol'
You should use one or the
other.
>> In that case you are stuck with him
> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> nutters.
Yeah... they rushed up to your defense, insisting you have every right to
use your freedom of speech to be a troll.
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
Well... you get the idea.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
news:[email protected]...
> "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>snip
>>> He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
>>> have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.
> He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
> great deal more.
>>Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
>>of 'free speech".
> Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
> discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
> on usenet.
You don't use your brain, either, PB. A bit of advice from the ol'
You should use one or the
other.
>> In that case you are stuck with him
> Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
> Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
> take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.
> Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
> nutters.
Yeah... they rushed up to your defense, insisting you have every right to
use your freedom of speech to be a troll.
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed... And I laughed...
Well... you get the idea.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> PB
> The return address has been MUNGED
> My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/
Aug 6th 2006 | 4:49 pm
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Gregory Morrow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>> >
>> >What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>> >machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>> >was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>> >
>> >It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>> >even.
>> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
>> generalised term of abuse.
>> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
>> he is dishonest.
> Earl and Donna are gone so he turns his attentions to rte....
Rubbish. I turned my attention to one troll posting to AADP that I would
have never seen if limited to rte. That one post generated a firestorm of
protests from those who insisted "he's a troll... but he's our troll." I only
concerned with that one single post to that troll, and it appears that those
who did try to jump on me from that group are nothing but a pack of
bigots. Why didn't you limit YOUR response to only rte, Greg? Doing
a bit of trolling of your own?
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> Best
> Greg
>
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>> Dave Frightens Me <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>> >
>> >What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>> >machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>> >was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>> >
>> >It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>> >even.
>> Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
>> generalised term of abuse.
>> I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
>> he is dishonest.
> Earl and Donna are gone so he turns his attentions to rte....
Rubbish. I turned my attention to one troll posting to AADP that I would
have never seen if limited to rte. That one post generated a firestorm of
protests from those who insisted "he's a troll... but he's our troll." I only
concerned with that one single post to that troll, and it appears that those
who did try to jump on me from that group are nothing but a pack of
bigots. Why didn't you limit YOUR response to only rte, Greg? Doing
a bit of trolling of your own?
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> Best
> Greg
>
Aug 6th 2006 | 4:56 pm
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos
"Gregory Morrow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ups.com...
> Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>> On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>> What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>> machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>> was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>> It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>> even.
> No need to try and "discredit" the left, DFM, in the case of Israel
> they do it to themselves EVERY single day...
> The leftist mainstream media lie and Lie and LIE about Israel on a
> daily basis, They swallow the most absurd Arab propaganda and
> dispense it as "facts". If you do a little digging you'll find there
> was no Qana "massacre", there was no Haditha "massacre", there was no
> Gaza beach picnic "massacre"...all these things were cynically staged
> by the Arabs to elicit cheap sympathy from gullible people. Still
> another reason why I consider ALL Arabs to be contemptible cheats and
> liars...
Now, now... Greg... do not overestimate... I am sure that at least 1% of Arabs
are not contemptible cheats and liars.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/arc...s_qana_staged/
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...438.shtml?s=ic
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1260
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> Best
> Greg
>
news:[email protected] ups.com...
> Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>> On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n
>> What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
>> machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
>> was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.
>> It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
>> even.
> No need to try and "discredit" the left, DFM, in the case of Israel
> they do it to themselves EVERY single day...
> The leftist mainstream media lie and Lie and LIE about Israel on a
> daily basis, They swallow the most absurd Arab propaganda and
> dispense it as "facts". If you do a little digging you'll find there
> was no Qana "massacre", there was no Haditha "massacre", there was no
> Gaza beach picnic "massacre"...all these things were cynically staged
> by the Arabs to elicit cheap sympathy from gullible people. Still
> another reason why I consider ALL Arabs to be contemptible cheats and
> liars...
Now, now... Greg... do not overestimate... I am sure that at least 1% of Arabs
are not contemptible cheats and liars.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/arc...s_qana_staged/
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...438.shtml?s=ic
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1260
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
> Best
> Greg
>
