Speaking of polls
Mar 8th 2003, 5:58 am
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Speaking of polls
They don't give the demographics for this, but just for the information
of creatures like ArKLyte, see:
http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
of creatures like ArKLyte, see:
http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
Mar 8th 2003, 9:02 am
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
>They don't give the demographics for this, but just for the information
>of creatures like ArKLyte, see:
>http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
Mike Quint
"Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
nor security."
-BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
>of creatures like ArKLyte, see:
>http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
Mike Quint
"Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
nor security."
-BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Mar 8th 2003, 10:18 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
On 08 Mar 2003 22:02:31 GMT, [email protected] (Mike Quint) wrote:
>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
"NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
opinion."
Gordon
>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
"NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
opinion."
Gordon
Mar 8th 2003, 8:23 pm
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
>>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
>Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
Gordon
You are right, I just voted for the second time. I really wanted to believe
this was an accurate poll. However I do not believe the national polls that are
telling of the great support for Bush either. I am not seeing this support
here, on the radio, amongst my co-workers (mostly Republicans) or any place
people are talking. And they do claim to be scientific.
Mike Quint
"Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
nor security."
-BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
>Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
Gordon
You are right, I just voted for the second time. I really wanted to believe
this was an accurate poll. However I do not believe the national polls that are
telling of the great support for Bush either. I am not seeing this support
here, on the radio, amongst my co-workers (mostly Republicans) or any place
people are talking. And they do claim to be scientific.
Mike Quint
"Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
nor security."
-BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Mar 8th 2003, 8:38 pm
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 23:18:00 GMT, Gordon Forbess
wrote:
>>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
>Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
>"NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
>enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
>opinion."
But I have read of representative polls which have asked the same
question in european countries who is the biggest threat.
In Germany the result was about 55 %
an Great Britain it was about 70 %
being the USA.
Wolfgang
wrote:
>>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
>Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
>"NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
>enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
>opinion."
But I have read of representative polls which have asked the same
question in european countries who is the biggest threat.
In Germany the result was about 55 %
an Great Britain it was about 70 %
being the USA.
Wolfgang
Mar 9th 2003, 5:59 am
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
Gordon Forbess wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2003 22:02:31 GMT, [email protected] (Mike Quint) wrote:
> >I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
>
> Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
That's true, and the disclaimer below is extremely important, but the
site reports close to 700,000 votes cast and 12% of them indicate they
fear the threat of countries other than the USA.
> "NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
> enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
> opinion."
__________________________________________________ ___________
A San Franciscan who's visited 49 of 50 US states
http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net
> On 08 Mar 2003 22:02:31 GMT, [email protected] (Mike Quint) wrote:
> >I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
>
> Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
That's true, and the disclaimer below is extremely important, but the
site reports close to 700,000 votes cast and 12% of them indicate they
fear the threat of countries other than the USA.
> "NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and
> enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular
> opinion."
__________________________________________________ ___________
A San Franciscan who's visited 49 of 50 US states
http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net
Mar 9th 2003, 9:19 am
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Speaking of polls
Mike Quint wrote:
>
> >>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
> >
> >Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
> >
>
> Gordon
> You are right, I just voted for the second time. I really wanted to believe
> this was an accurate poll. However I do not believe the national polls that are
> telling of the great support for Bush either. I am not seeing this support
> here, on the radio, amongst my co-workers (mostly Republicans) or any place
> people are talking. And they do claim to be scientific.
> Mike Quint
I think that's the perception many of us have - if so many of the people
we know, even among those we might expect to be Bush supporters, do NOT
appear to support him, who are the pollsters asking? (And we reach the
unhappy conclusion that perhaps they are rigging them to get the results
the administration WANTS them to show?) When I posted the link to the
TIME poll, I SAID it did not give the demographics, and obviously you
can vote nore than once. But does anyone seriously think that, out of a
total of 670,000+ votes, people voting more than once can account for
87.9% of that number? (The majority may not be quite that overwhelming,
but it's certainly food for thought - or should be.)
>
> "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
> nor security."
>
> -BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
>
> >>I am impressed, why isn't it being talked about on our national news
> >
> >Because you can vote as many times as you want, for starters.
> >
>
> Gordon
> You are right, I just voted for the second time. I really wanted to believe
> this was an accurate poll. However I do not believe the national polls that are
> telling of the great support for Bush either. I am not seeing this support
> here, on the radio, amongst my co-workers (mostly Republicans) or any place
> people are talking. And they do claim to be scientific.
> Mike Quint
I think that's the perception many of us have - if so many of the people
we know, even among those we might expect to be Bush supporters, do NOT
appear to support him, who are the pollsters asking? (And we reach the
unhappy conclusion that perhaps they are rigging them to get the results
the administration WANTS them to show?) When I posted the link to the
TIME poll, I SAID it did not give the demographics, and obviously you
can vote nore than once. But does anyone seriously think that, out of a
total of 670,000+ votes, people voting more than once can account for
87.9% of that number? (The majority may not be quite that overwhelming,
but it's certainly food for thought - or should be.)
>
> "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom
> nor security."
>
> -BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
