Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
Feb 28th 2007, 11:02 pm
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
"The Reid" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen Ellenson"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>
> these sort of things happen because people protest about them.
> --
> Mike Reid
> UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@
> this site
> Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
> Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
I agree. You just shouldn't order "le royale"** if you ever go there.
**pulp fiction reference (w/cheese)
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen Ellenson"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>
> these sort of things happen because people protest about them.
> --
> Mike Reid
> UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@
> this site
> Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
> Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
I agree. You just shouldn't order "le royale"** if you ever go there.
**pulp fiction reference (w/cheese)
Feb 28th 2007, 11:04 pm
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Mar 1, 1:01 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2007 03:23:44 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Mar 1, 12:08 pm, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor
> >(*)) wrote:
> >> Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>
> >> > >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> > >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
> >> > >> >>family' ?
>
> >> > >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>
> >> > >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
> >> > >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>
> >> > >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>
> >> > They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>
> >> Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >> disagree with.
>
> >> --
> >> (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
> >> David Horne-http://www.davidhorne.net
> >> (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
>
> >...I bet he'd like to sell his produce to McD's
>
> but would McDs want it?
>
> There's constant confusion between his own utterances and the scripted ones that
> he makes in speeches.
> --
>
> Martin
....would be a win win situation, he gets to fill his already
overflowing coffers, and they get the royal seal blubber
> On 1 Mar 2007 03:23:44 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Mar 1, 12:08 pm, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor
> >(*)) wrote:
> >> Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>
> >> > >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> > >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
> >> > >> >>family' ?
>
> >> > >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>
> >> > >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
> >> > >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>
> >> > >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>
> >> > They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>
> >> Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >> disagree with.
>
> >> --
> >> (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
> >> David Horne-http://www.davidhorne.net
> >> (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
>
> >...I bet he'd like to sell his produce to McD's
>
> but would McDs want it?
>
> There's constant confusion between his own utterances and the scripted ones that
> he makes in speeches.
> --
>
> Martin
....would be a win win situation, he gets to fill his already
overflowing coffers, and they get the royal seal blubber
Feb 28th 2007, 11:05 pm
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >>
>> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> >>family' ?
>> >>
>> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>> >>
>> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>
>> >
>> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>>
>> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>
>Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>disagree with.
He also talks bollocks, when he hasn't the help of the royal spin doctor.
I'd suggest that if he gave up living on the income provided by his tenant
farmers in the Duchy of Cornwall and instead lived off the profits of his
organic garden on his estate, he might be more in touch with the real world.
--
Martin
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >>
>> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> >>family' ?
>> >>
>> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>> >>
>> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>
>> >
>> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>>
>> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>
>Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>disagree with.
He also talks bollocks, when he hasn't the help of the royal spin doctor.
I'd suggest that if he gave up living on the income provided by his tenant
farmers in the Duchy of Cornwall and instead lived off the profits of his
organic garden on his estate, he might be more in touch with the real world.
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:15 pm
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>
> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >> >>
> >> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
> >> >> >>family' ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
> >> >>
> >> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
> >> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
> >
> >> >
> >> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
> >>
> >> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
> >
> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >disagree with.
>
> He also talks bollocks,
What has he said about food which was bollocks?
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>
> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >> >>
> >> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
> >> >> >>family' ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
> >> >>
> >> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
> >> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
> >
> >> >
> >> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
> >>
> >> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
> >
> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >disagree with.
>
> He also talks bollocks,
What has he said about food which was bollocks?
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
Feb 28th 2007, 11:18 pm
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:15:20 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
>> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>>
>> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> >> >>family' ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>> >>
>> >> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>> >
>> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>> >disagree with.
>>
>> He also talks bollocks,
>
>What has he said about food which was bollocks?
Nothing, he denied it.
What has he said about food or anything else for that matter that is at all
original or worth GBP15million/annum of tenant farmers rents?
--
Martin
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
>> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>>
>> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> >> >>family' ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>> >>
>> >> They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>> >
>> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>> >disagree with.
>>
>> He also talks bollocks,
>
>What has he said about food which was bollocks?
Nothing, he denied it.
What has he said about food or anything else for that matter that is at all
original or worth GBP15million/annum of tenant farmers rents?
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:19 pm
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:53:35 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on 28 Feb 2007 16:36:55 -0800, "Gregory Morrow"
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>>
>>> >The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>
>>> >> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>> >> McDs.
>>>
>>> >When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>> >vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>> >there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>>
>>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>>
>>
>>
>>Rubbish. They don't "suck" the litle buggers into *anything*, DFM...
>>
>>Good nutrition habits start in the *home*...
>
>And on television.
in front of?
--
Martin
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on 28 Feb 2007 16:36:55 -0800, "Gregory Morrow"
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>>
>>> >The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>
>>> >> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>> >> McDs.
>>>
>>> >When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>> >vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>> >there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>>
>>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>>
>>
>>
>>Rubbish. They don't "suck" the litle buggers into *anything*, DFM...
>>
>>Good nutrition habits start in the *home*...
>
>And on television.
in front of?
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:20 pm
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:55:08 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:06:33 +0100, Martin
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:11:35 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>
>>>Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:35 GMT, "Alan"
>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Tom Peel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>>> Are we talking about the meat or the breadroll? Or the coke that comes
>>>>> with it?
>>>>>
>>>>> T.
>>>>>
>>>>who mentioned coke
>>>
>>>I'm guessing few are sold without.
>>
>>How would you know? You never go in McDs.
>
>I do on occasions. Heck, I was there just last year, and IIRC the
>burger alone costs nearly that of the whole meal including coke.
You bought coke? Bloody hypocrite!
)
--
Martin
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:06:33 +0100, Martin
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:11:35 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>
>>>Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:35 GMT, "Alan"
>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Tom Peel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>>> Are we talking about the meat or the breadroll? Or the coke that comes
>>>>> with it?
>>>>>
>>>>> T.
>>>>>
>>>>who mentioned coke
>>>
>>>I'm guessing few are sold without.
>>
>>How would you know? You never go in McDs.
>
>I do on occasions. Heck, I was there just last year, and IIRC the
>burger alone costs nearly that of the whole meal including coke.
You bought coke? Bloody hypocrite!
)--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:21 pm
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen
Ellenson" <[email protected]> writted:
>
>"Deeply Filled Mortician" <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote
>in message news:[email protected]...
>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>
>>>The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>>
>>>> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>>> McDs.
>>>
>>>When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>>vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>>there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>
>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>> --
>> ---
>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>> ---
>
>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Ellenson" <[email protected]> writted:
>
>"Deeply Filled Mortician" <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote
>in message news:[email protected]...
>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>
>>>The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>>
>>>> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>>> McDs.
>>>
>>>When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>>vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>>there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>
>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>> --
>> ---
>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>> ---
>
>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Feb 28th 2007, 11:22 pm
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:21:14 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen
>Ellenson" <[email protected]> writted:
>
>>
>>"Deeply Filled Mortician" <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote
>>in message news:[email protected]...
>>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>>
>>>>The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>>>
>>>>> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>>>> McDs.
>>>>
>>>>When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>>>vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>>>there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>>
>>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>>> ---
>>
>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>
>It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
>and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
The meat is pure unadulterated minced Irish and British beef, which is more than
you can say about a FEBO snack.
--
Martin
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen
>Ellenson" <[email protected]> writted:
>
>>
>>"Deeply Filled Mortician" <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote
>>in message news:[email protected]...
>>> Let is be knownst that on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:07:42 +0000,
>>> [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) writted:
>>>
>>>>The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:41 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >sugar 4.17 --- 2
>>>>>
>>>>> assuming that's from the bun, that's one of the things I dislike about
>>>>> McDs.
>>>>
>>>>When have you ever had to go to one? I don't believe McDs is as evil and
>>>>vile as some do, probably, but I sure as hell won't waste my time eating
>>>>there, given easy to find and superior alternatives.
>>>
>>> McDs is evil in the way they suck in children to the junk food trap.
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>>> ---
>>
>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>
>It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
>and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
The meat is pure unadulterated minced Irish and British beef, which is more than
you can say about a FEBO snack.
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:31 pm
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On 1 Mar 2007 04:04:24 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mar 1, 1:01 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 1 Mar 2007 03:23:44 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Mar 1, 12:08 pm, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor
>> >(*)) wrote:
>> >> Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> > >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>
>> >> > >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> > >> >>family' ?
>>
>> >> > >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>>
>> >> > >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> > >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>>
>> >> > >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>>
>> >> > They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>>
>> >> Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>> >> disagree with.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
>> >> David Horne-http://www.davidhorne.net
>> >> (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
>>
>> >...I bet he'd like to sell his produce to McD's
>>
>> but would McDs want it?
>>
>> There's constant confusion between his own utterances and the scripted ones that
>> he makes in speeches.
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>
>....would be a win win situation, he gets to fill his already
>overflowing coffers, and they get the royal seal blubber
Isn't he several Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals?
They could replace the armed forces in Iraq with him.
--
Martin
>On Mar 1, 1:01 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 1 Mar 2007 03:23:44 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Mar 1, 12:08 pm, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_ chancellor
>> >(*)) wrote:
>> >> Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > On 1 Mar 2007 03:05:11 -0800, "Besmet Kalkoen" <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> > >On Mar 1, 9:13 am, The Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:10:10 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>
>> >> > >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>is it worse than being sucked into the idea of needing a 'royal
>> >> > >> >>family' ?
>>
>> >> > >> >Yes, you can ignore the royals, but lard keeps on returning.
>>
>> >> > >> its also a bizarre idea that theres any relationship between the
>> >> > >> desirability of a royal family and fatty food.
>>
>> >> > >...then they should keep their large royal mouths shut !
>>
>> >> > They didn't lose their heads, when all around were losing theirs.
>>
>> >> Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>> >> disagree with.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
>> >> David Horne-http://www.davidhorne.net
>> >> (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
>>
>> >...I bet he'd like to sell his produce to McD's
>>
>> but would McDs want it?
>>
>> There's constant confusion between his own utterances and the scripted ones that
>> he makes in speeches.
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>
>....would be a win win situation, he gets to fill his already
>overflowing coffers, and they get the royal seal blubber
Isn't he several Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals?
They could replace the armed forces in Iraq with him.
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:31 pm
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:15:20 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>
> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> >> chancellor (*)) wrote:
[]
> >> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >> >disagree with.
> >>
> >> He also talks bollocks,
> >
> >What has he said about food which was bollocks?
>
> Nothing, he denied it.
>
> What has he said about food or anything else for that matter that is at all
> original or worth GBP15million/annum of tenant farmers rents?
His originality or the lack thereof isn't the point. I thought you said
he was talking bollocks. I don't recall disagreeing with anything he
said about food.
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:15:20 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> chancellor (*)) wrote:
>
> >Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
> >> chancellor (*)) wrote:
[]
> >> >Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
> >> >disagree with.
> >>
> >> He also talks bollocks,
> >
> >What has he said about food which was bollocks?
>
> Nothing, he denied it.
>
> What has he said about food or anything else for that matter that is at all
> original or worth GBP15million/annum of tenant farmers rents?
His originality or the lack thereof isn't the point. I thought you said
he was talking bollocks. I don't recall disagreeing with anything he
said about food.
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
Feb 28th 2007, 11:32 pm
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:02:51 -0600, "Stephen Ellenson" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>"The Reid" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen Ellenson"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>>
>> these sort of things happen because people protest about them.
>I agree. You just shouldn't order "le royale"** if you ever go there.
>
>**pulp fiction reference (w/cheese)
>
*** Non dairy cheese in the USA.
--
Martin
wrote:
>
>"The Reid" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:55:07 -0600, "Stephen Ellenson"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>They know they have an image problem and are introducing many items in the
>>>US like salads, chicken, etc. and removing trans fats from the fries.
>>
>> these sort of things happen because people protest about them.
>I agree. You just shouldn't order "le royale"** if you ever go there.
>
>**pulp fiction reference (w/cheese)
>
*** Non dairy cheese in the USA.
--
Martin
Feb 28th 2007, 11:36 pm
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:04:44 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*)) wrote:
>> In was invariably on Waterloo station, which at the time only had
>> major franchises. I switched to filled croissants when an outlet
>> became available.
>
>There's a decent sandwich shop near Waterloo, under one of the bridges.
I used to work at Waterloo, theres all sorts of stuff, theres a good
restro under one of the arches and a good pub, but when your rushing
for the train, they dont get a look in, even if open at 11pm+
--
Mike Reid
UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
_the_ chancellor (*)) wrote:
>> In was invariably on Waterloo station, which at the time only had
>> major franchises. I switched to filled croissants when an outlet
>> became available.
>
>There's a decent sandwich shop near Waterloo, under one of the bridges.
I used to work at Waterloo, theres all sorts of stuff, theres a good
restro under one of the arches and a good pub, but when your rushing
for the train, they dont get a look in, even if open at 11pm+
--
Mike Reid
UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
Feb 28th 2007, 11:38 pm
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:05 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>disagree with.
I like duchy original cheese biscuits with black pepper, anyone had
the pasty?
--
Mike Reid
UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
_the_ chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Charles has said a lot of things about food recently which are hard to
>disagree with.
I like duchy original cheese biscuits with black pepper, anyone had
the pasty?
--
Mike Reid
UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"
Feb 28th 2007, 11:40 pm
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Prince Charles says ban McDonald's food
Let is be knownst that on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:22:07 +0100, Martin
<[email protected]> writted:
>On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:21:14 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
>>and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
>
>The meat is pure unadulterated minced Irish and British beef, which is more than
>you can say about a FEBO snack.
I don't think FEBO is a good example of food!
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
<[email protected]> writted:
>On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:21:14 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>It wont change the fact that their food is massively over processed
>>and laiden with fat, salt, and sugar!
>
>The meat is pure unadulterated minced Irish and British beef, which is more than
>you can say about a FEBO snack.
I don't think FEBO is a good example of food!
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
