Made in Britain, dumped in China
Jan 29th 2007 | 11:05 pm
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>What you going to use then?
It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
--
Martin
>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>What you going to use then?
It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
--
Martin
Jan 30th 2007 | 9:11 am
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Let is be knownst that on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:03:40 +0000, The Reid
<[email protected]> writted:
>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>
>>Next in line had better be ME!!!
>
>then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-)
We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not
a burden anyone should bear.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
<[email protected]> writted:
>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>
>>Next in line had better be ME!!!
>
>then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-)
We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not
a burden anyone should bear.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Jan 30th 2007 | 12:50 pm
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>
> On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>> >> >> <[email protected]> writted:
>>
>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>
>> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives
>> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>> >> >> >> >> > transportation
>> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>
>> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>
>> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world
>> >> >> >should
>> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>> >> >> sewerage
>> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>
>> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source
>> >> in their situation?
>> >> --
>>
>> >> Martin
>>
>> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>> > place.
>> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>> What you going to use then?
>
> do you have a cite for that ?
> http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
And your page is unavailable.
news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>
> On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>> >> >> <[email protected]> writted:
>>
>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>
>> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives
>> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>> >> >> >> >> > transportation
>> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>
>> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>
>> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>> >> >> >should
>> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>> >> >> sewerage
>> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>
>> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source
>> >> in their situation?
>> >> --
>>
>> >> Martin
>>
>> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>> > place.
>> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>> What you going to use then?
>
> do you have a cite for that ?
> http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
And your page is unavailable.
Jan 30th 2007 | 12:52 pm
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>available.
>>What you going to use then?
>
> It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
> --
>
> Martin
>
But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small
amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up.
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>available.
>>What you going to use then?
>
> It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
> --
>
> Martin
>
But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small
amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up.
Jan 30th 2007 | 2:51 pm
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>>
>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cwm .googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>
>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>
>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>--
>>>
>>>>>Martin
>>>
>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>place.
>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>
>>>What you going to use then?
>>
>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>
>
>
> And your page is unavailable.
>
>
Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>>
>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cwm .googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>
>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>
>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>--
>>>
>>>>>Martin
>>>
>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>place.
>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>
>>>What you going to use then?
>>
>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>
>
>
> And your page is unavailable.
>
>
Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
Jan 30th 2007 | 4:11 pm
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>>
>>>
>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>
>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>
>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>>>Martin
>>>>
>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>place.
>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>
>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>
>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> And your page is unavailable.
>
> Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
Nope, said page was unavailable.
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>>
>>>
>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>
>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>
>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>>>Martin
>>>>
>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>place.
>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>
>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>
>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> And your page is unavailable.
>
> Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
Nope, said page was unavailable.
Jan 30th 2007 | 4:16 pm
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>>
>>>
>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>
>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>
>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>>>Martin
>>>>
>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>place.
>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>
>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>
>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> And your page is unavailable.
>
> Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
Uranium is actually a very common mineral. Burning coal puts about 17 tons
a year of it in to the atmosphere.
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>>
>>>
>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>
>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>
>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>>>Martin
>>>>
>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>place.
>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>
>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>
>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> And your page is unavailable.
>
> Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
Uranium is actually a very common mineral. Burning coal puts about 17 tons
a year of it in to the atmosphere.
Jan 30th 2007 | 6:17 pm
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Jan 31, 6:11 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] m...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected] roups.com...
>
> >>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
> >>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
> >>>>>>>>>should
> >>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>
> >>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> >>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
> >>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
> >>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>
> >>>>>>in their situation?
> >>>>>>--
>
> >>>>>>Martin
>
> >>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
> >>>>>place.
> >>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
> >>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
> >>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>
> >>>>What you going to use then?
>
> >>>do you have a cite for that ?
> >>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> >>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
> >> And your page is unavailable.
>
> > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> > are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
> Nope, said page was unavailable.
no problem here, but here is the :-
Summary
A new generation of nuclear reactors will increase demand for uranium
ore to produce reactor fuel.
In 2005 the world nuclear fleet consumed about 68,000 tonnes of
natural uranium, mostly from
mined sources. At the end of 2005 the world known recoverable uranium
resources amounted
to about 3.6 million tonnes (t). These resources show a wide variation
in ore grade and
accessibility. Understanding this variation is essential for assessing
nuclear energy security.
Uranium ore is not an energy resource unless the ore grade is high
enough. Below grade 0.02%
(U3O8Uranium Oxide) more energy is required to produce and exploit the
uranium fuel than can be
generated from it. Falling ore grade leads to rapidly rising CO2
emissions from the nuclear energy cycle.
Assuming world nuclear generating capacity remains at 2005 levels,
after about 2016 the mean
grade of uranium ore will fall significantly from today's levels, and
even more so after 2034.
After about 60 years the world nuclear power system will fall off the
'Energy Cliff' - meaning that
the nuclear system will consume as much energy as can be generated
from the uranium fuel.
Whether large and rich new uranium ore deposits will be found or not
is unknown.
Once high-grade uranium ores are no-longer available, the nuclear
industry will rely on uranium
and plutonium from military and civil stockpiles. These will last only
a few years, and questions
remain about the net energy gain from reprocessing these materials. In
the future, it is likely that
the nuclear industry and governments will look to MOX fuel - a mixture
of uranium and plutonium
dioxides. In time, the nuclear industry hopes to develop fast breeder
reactors fueled by weapons
useable plutonium. The widespread use and production of either fuel
has serious implications
for nuclear weapons proliferation and the risk of nuclear terrorism.
It is inevitable that replacements for uranium fuel will be sought
within the lifetime of any new
nuclear build in the UK. It is also inevitable that as high grade
uranium supplies decrease, the
cost of nuclear power will increase along with nuclear CO2 emissions.
The security risks
associated with MOX and plutonium fuel should not be underestimated.
These concerns should be
reviewed by Government, Parliament and the public before a decision is
taken on the future of nuclear power.
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] m...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected] roups.com...
>
> >>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
> >>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world> >>>>>>>>>should
> >>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>
> >>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> >>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
> >>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
> >>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>
> >>>>>>in their situation?
> >>>>>>--
>
> >>>>>>Martin
>
> >>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
> >>>>>place.
> >>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
> >>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
> >>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>
> >>>>What you going to use then?
>
> >>>do you have a cite for that ?
> >>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> >>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
> >> And your page is unavailable.
>
> > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
> > are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
> Nope, said page was unavailable.
no problem here, but here is the :-
Summary
A new generation of nuclear reactors will increase demand for uranium
ore to produce reactor fuel.
In 2005 the world nuclear fleet consumed about 68,000 tonnes of
natural uranium, mostly from
mined sources. At the end of 2005 the world known recoverable uranium
resources amounted
to about 3.6 million tonnes (t). These resources show a wide variation
in ore grade and
accessibility. Understanding this variation is essential for assessing
nuclear energy security.
Uranium ore is not an energy resource unless the ore grade is high
enough. Below grade 0.02%
(U3O8Uranium Oxide) more energy is required to produce and exploit the
uranium fuel than can be
generated from it. Falling ore grade leads to rapidly rising CO2
emissions from the nuclear energy cycle.
Assuming world nuclear generating capacity remains at 2005 levels,
after about 2016 the mean
grade of uranium ore will fall significantly from today's levels, and
even more so after 2034.
After about 60 years the world nuclear power system will fall off the
'Energy Cliff' - meaning that
the nuclear system will consume as much energy as can be generated
from the uranium fuel.
Whether large and rich new uranium ore deposits will be found or not
is unknown.
Once high-grade uranium ores are no-longer available, the nuclear
industry will rely on uranium
and plutonium from military and civil stockpiles. These will last only
a few years, and questions
remain about the net energy gain from reprocessing these materials. In
the future, it is likely that
the nuclear industry and governments will look to MOX fuel - a mixture
of uranium and plutonium
dioxides. In time, the nuclear industry hopes to develop fast breeder
reactors fueled by weapons
useable plutonium. The widespread use and production of either fuel
has serious implications
for nuclear weapons proliferation and the risk of nuclear terrorism.
It is inevitable that replacements for uranium fuel will be sought
within the lifetime of any new
nuclear build in the UK. It is also inevitable that as high grade
uranium supplies decrease, the
cost of nuclear power will increase along with nuclear CO2 emissions.
The security risks
associated with MOX and plutonium fuel should not be underestimated.
These concerns should be
reviewed by Government, Parliament and the public before a decision is
taken on the future of nuclear power.
Jan 30th 2007 | 7:16 pm
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Jan 30, 11:11 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:03:40 +0000, The Reid
> <[email protected]> writted:
>
> >On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>
> >>Next in line had better be ME!!!
>
> >then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-)
>
> We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not
> a burden anyone should bear.
> --
> ---
> DFM -http://www.deepfriedmars.com
> ---
> --
.....I'm so bored I could listen to Genesis......
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:03:40 +0000, The Reid
> <[email protected]> writted:
>
> >On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>
> >>Next in line had better be ME!!!
>
> >then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-)
>
> We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not
> a burden anyone should bear.
> --
> ---
> DFM -http://www.deepfriedmars.com
> ---
> --
.....I'm so bored I could listen to Genesis......
Jan 30th 2007 | 9:15 pm
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:50:40 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected] oups.com...
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>> >> >> <[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives
>>> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>> >> >> >> >> > transportation
>>> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>
>>> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>> >> >> >should
>>> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>> >> >> sewerage
>>> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>
>>> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>> >> in their situation?
>>> >> --
>>>
>>> >> Martin
>>>
>>> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>> > place.
>>> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>> What you going to use then?
>>
>> do you have a cite for that ?
http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>
>
>And your page is unavailable.
It works for me. Did you lose the last part of the URL?
--
Martin
>
>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected] oups.com...
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>> >> >> <[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives
>>> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>> >> >> >> >> > transportation
>>> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>
>>> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>> >> >> >should
>>> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>> >> >> sewerage
>>> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>
>>> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>> >> in their situation?
>>> >> --
>>>
>>> >> Martin
>>>
>>> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>> > place.
>>> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>> What you going to use then?
>>
>> do you have a cite for that ?
http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>
>
>And your page is unavailable.
It works for me. Did you lose the last part of the URL?
--
Martin
Jan 30th 2007 | 9:16 pm
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:52:22 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>available.
>>>What you going to use then?
>>
>> It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>>
>
>But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small
>amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up.
>
Part of it is plutonium, which is returned to Russia for enrichment.
--
Martin
>
>"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>available.
>>>What you going to use then?
>>
>> It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia.
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>>
>
>But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small
>amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up.
>
Part of it is plutonium, which is returned to Russia for enrichment.
--
Martin
Jan 31st 2007 | 3:19 pm
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected] groups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000c wm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>>
>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>
>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>
>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
>>are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>
>
>
> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
>
Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
/briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected] groups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000c wm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's
>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available.
>>>>>
>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>
>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>
>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you
>>are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>
>
>
> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
>
Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
/briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
Jan 31st 2007 | 4:08 pm
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>
>>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
>>>>>>>>>world's
>>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>>>>>available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>>
>>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>>
>>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
>>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
> Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
> /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>
> I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>
>
> Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>
I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Calif Bill wrote:
>
>> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>
>>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
>>>>>>>>>world's
>>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>>>>>available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>>
>>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>>
>>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
>>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
> Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
> /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>
> I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>
>
> Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>
I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
Jan 31st 2007 | 7:02 pm
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Feb 1, 6:08 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] om...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected].. .
>
> >>>Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com...
>
> >>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
> >>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
> >>>>>>>>>>>should
> >>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>
> >>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
> >>>>>>>>>>sewerage
> >>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
> >>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
> >>>>>>>>>world's
> >>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>
> >>>>>>>>in their situation?
> >>>>>>>>--
>
> >>>>>>>>Martin
>
> >>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
> >>>>>>>place.
> >>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
> >>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
> >>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
> >>>>>>>available.
>
> >>>>>>What you going to use then?
>
> >>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
> >>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> >>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
> >>>>And your page is unavailable.
>
> >>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
> >>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
> >> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
> > Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
> > /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>
> > I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>
> > Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>
> I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
> known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
> much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
> energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
> inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
and you know that because ........??
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] om...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected].. .
>
> >>>Calif Bill wrote:
>
> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com...
>
> >>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
> >>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world> >>>>>>>>>>>should
> >>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>
> >>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
> >>>>>>>>>>sewerage
> >>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
> >>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
> >>>>>>>>>world's
> >>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>
> >>>>>>>>in their situation?
> >>>>>>>>--
>
> >>>>>>>>Martin
>
> >>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
> >>>>>>>place.
> >>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
> >>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
> >>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
> >>>>>>>available.
>
> >>>>>>What you going to use then?
>
> >>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
> >>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
> >>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>
> >>>>And your page is unavailable.
>
> >>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
> >>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>
> >> Nope, said page was unavailable.
>
> > Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
> > /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>
> > I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>
> > Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>
> I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
> known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
> much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
> energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
> inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
and you know that because ........??
Feb 1st 2007 | 3:27 am
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]. ..
>>>
>>>
>>>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected] legroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g200 0cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l .nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to doMaybe the world
>>>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
>>>>>>>>>>world's
>>>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>>>>>>available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>>>
>>>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
>>>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Nope, said page was unavailable.
>>
>>Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
>>/briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>>
>>I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>>
>>
>>Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>>
>
>
> I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
> known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
> much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
> energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
> inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
>
>
Strange, all three times that I have tried when I click on the link I
get the "not available" message. When I then add the rest of the
address from the second line I get the fact sheet file in PDF format.
Perhaps they have you blocked.
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]. ..
>>>
>>>
>>>>Calif Bill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected] legroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g200 0cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l .nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
Maybe the world>>>>>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling
>>>>>>>>>>>sewerage
>>>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the
>>>>>>>>>>world's
>>>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>in their situation?
>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>>>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>>>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is
>>>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy
>>>>>>>>available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What you going to use then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>do you have a cite for that ?
>>>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/
>>>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And your page is unavailable.
>>>>
>>>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely
>>>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Nope, said page was unavailable.
>>
>>Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with
>>/briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link.
>>
>>I had no trouble. Earlier of now.
>>
>>
>>Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address.
>>
>
>
> I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of
> known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how
> much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get
> energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds
> inhabitants and have only a small need for oil.
>
>
Strange, all three times that I have tried when I click on the link I
get the "not available" message. When I then add the rest of the
address from the second line I get the fact sheet file in PDF format.
Perhaps they have you blocked.
