-Martin

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:21:43 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:

>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 01:47:41 -0800, "Jesus"
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>
>>
>>On Jan 28, 8:58 am, Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Alfred Molon wrote:
>>> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>>> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>>> > cost would also be lower.Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>>or just recycle it at home.....
>
>Just put it in a woman's handbag and it'll never be seen again.

LOL along with 3 or 4 credit cards, an ID card, the missing car keys, a wedding
ring ...
--

Martin

Mister Bartlett

Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alfred Molon wrote:
> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> > cost would also be lower.
>
> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!

Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.

B;


--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
<http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG>

Deeply Filled Mortician

Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:

>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.

It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Jesus

On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> >> > cost would also be lower.
>
> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.

> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.

....it would give the Abo's something to do

Deeply Filled Mortician

Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
<[email protected]> writted:

>
>
>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>
>> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
>> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
>....it would give the Abo's something to do

Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Jesus

On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> <[email protected]> writted:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>
> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >....it would give the Abo's something to do Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.

time for some solar desalination.....

-Martin

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:37:25 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:

>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
><[email protected]> writted:
>
>>
>>
>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>>> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>>> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>>
>>> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>>> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>>> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>>> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>>
>>> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>>
>>> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>
>>> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>
>>....it would give the Abo's something to do
>
>Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>for drinking now - not such a popular notion.

Sewerage has been recycled for drink in UK for years. You have probably drunk it
without being aware of it. I'm not talking about foreign lagers made under
license. London tap water had been through an average of seven kidneys before
Londoners get top drink it.

Australia could distil drinking water from seawater, if they weren't so silly
about using nuclear power.
--

Martin

-Martin

On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>> <[email protected]> writted:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>
>> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>
>> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>
>> >....it would give the Abo's something to do Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
>time for some solar desalination.....

Australia has 30% of the world's uranium, what would you use as a power source
in their situation?
--

Martin

Jesus

On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >> <[email protected]> writted:
>
> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower.
>
> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion.
>
> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's uranium, what would you use as a power source
> in their situation?
> --
>
> Martin

Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
place.
After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......

-Martin

On 29 Jan 2007 03:41:36 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:


>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>place.
>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......

When do you foresee Australia using up all their uranium reserves,
if they use them to power nuclear power stations?
Maybe, long after the Belgian motorway lights went out for good and you were
forced to cycle to Amstelveen?

The population of Australia is not much more than that of the Netherlands. How
many nuclear power stations do you think Australia will need?
--

Martin

Jesus

On Jan 29, 12:58 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2007 03:41:36 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
> >place.
> >After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
> >Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......When do you foresee Australia using up all their uranium reserves,
> if they use them to power nuclear power stations?
> Maybe, long after the Belgian motorway lights went out for good and you were
> forced to cycle to Amstelveen?
>
> The population of Australia is not much more than that of the Netherlands. How
> many nuclear power stations do you think Australia will need?
> --
>
> Martin

Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
place.

Jesus

On Jan 29, 12:20 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:37:25 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>
>
>
> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> ><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >>> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >>> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >>> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
> >>> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> >>> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> >>> >> > cost would also be lower.
>
> >>> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >>> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >>> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >>....it would give the Abo's something to do
>
> >Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
> >they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> >for drinking now - not such a popular notion.Sewerage has been recycled for drink in UK for years. You have probably drunk it
> without being aware of it. I'm not talking about foreign lagers made under
> license. London tap water had been through an average of seven kidneys before
> Londoners get top drink it.
>
> Australia could distil drinking water from seawater, if they weren't so silly
> about using nuclear power.
> --
>
> Martin........d'oh

Environmental Effects Of Uranium Mining In Australia

By Michael Krockenberger
ACF Campaigns Manager

Mine-site impacts within Australia vary according to the climate
and ecosystems in which the mine is situated. For instance, Ranger is
in a wet-dry tropical monsoonal climate, whereas Olympic Dam/Roxby
Downs is found in the arid zone of South Australia. Paradoxically, the
two mines face the contrasting problems of too much water and too
little water, and yet a major impact of both is contamination of water
bodies.

Ranger, through design faults arising from over-estimation of
evaporation and under-estimation of rainfall, has had ongoing problems
with the disposal of contaminated water. Radionuclides and heavy
metals find their way into the wetlands of Kakadu National Park
through water disposal, leaching and erosion. Although diluted by wet
season rainfall, these pollutants accumulate in organisms. The
continuation and proposed extension of uranium processing at Ranger
through the milling of Jabiluka ore would compound these problems.
Similar problems of water disposal and wetland contamination would
arise at Koongarra.

Olympic Dam is a huge mine and has a voracious appetite for
processing water. It currently draws this from Borefield A, located
north of the mine in the Great Artesian Basin, at the rate of about 15
million litres per day. Mine expansion is resulting in the development
of Borefield B further north-east, which will provide for a total of
42 million litres per day until 2036. This is an enormous burden on
the basin's fossil water resources. The entire pastoral industry and
town use for the basin in South Australia is 130 million litres per
day.

Poor design and management of waste at Olympic Dam has seen up to
five billion litres of highly toxic and acidic water leak from the
tailings dam into groundwater. This was kept secret for years by
Western Mining until the evidence became overwhelming.

Three of the uranium mines currently proposed for Australia -
Kintyre, Beverley and Honeymoon - are in arid areas and would require
underground water, with the very real potential for similar problems
of groundwater contamination.

It is worth remembering Rum Jungle, the uranium mine south of
Darwin which operated in the 1950s and 60s. The clean-up of
radioactive contamination cost the Australian government far more than
it ever earned from the mine. Mining techniques have improved since
then, but community expectations of environmental protection have
increased and action is demanded to maintain the integrity of national
parks, world heritage areas and the wider Australian environment.

-Martin

On 29 Jan 2007 04:44:11 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 29, 12:58 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 29 Jan 2007 03:41:36 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>> >place.
>> >After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to
>> >Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......When do you foresee Australia using up all their uranium reserves,
>> if they use them to power nuclear power stations?
>> Maybe, long after the Belgian motorway lights went out for good and you were
>> forced to cycle to Amstelveen?
>>
>> The population of Australia is not much more than that of the Netherlands. How
>> many nuclear power stations do you think Australia will need?
>> --
>>
>> Martin
>
>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first
>place.

You should know.

BTW calling yourself Jesus is offensive to some, but I am sure that's why you do
it.
--

Martin

-Martin

On 29 Jan 2007 05:09:14 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 29, 12:20 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:37:25 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>>
>>
>>
>> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
>> ><[email protected]> writted:
>>
>> >>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
>> >><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> >>> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
>> >>> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>>
>> >>> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >>> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >>> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
>> >>> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
>> >>> >> > cost would also be lower.
>>
>> >>> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>>
>> >>> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>>
>> >>> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>>
>> >>....it would give the Abo's something to do
>>
>> >Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
>> >they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
>> >for drinking now - not such a popular notion.Sewerage has been recycled for drink in UK for years. You have probably drunk it
>> without being aware of it. I'm not talking about foreign lagers made under
>> license. London tap water had been through an average of seven kidneys before
>> Londoners get top drink it.
>>
>> Australia could distil drinking water from seawater, if they weren't so silly
>> about using nuclear power.
>> --
>>
>> Martin........d'oh
>
>Environmental Effects Of Uranium Mining In Australia
>
> By Michael Krockenberger
> ACF Campaigns Manager

Who?

Never had problems like this European mines.
--

Martin

Jesus

On Jan 29, 2:18 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2007 05:09:14 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 29, 12:20 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:37:25 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
>
> >> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> >Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus"
> >> ><[email protected]> writted:
>
> >> >>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
> >> >><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
> >> >>> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100,
> >> >>> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted:
>
> >> >>> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >>> >> Alfred Molon wrote:
> >> >>> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where nobody lives
> >> >>> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The transportation
> >> >>> >> > cost would also be lower.
>
> >> >>> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there!
>
> >> >>> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet.
>
> >> >>> It's a requirement that their economy is shit.
>
> >> >>....it would give the Abo's something to do
>
> >> >Maybe the world should be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows
> >> >they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage
> >> >for drinking now - not such a popular notion.Sewerage has been recycled for drink in UK for years. You have probably drunk it
> >> without being aware of it. I'm not talking about foreign lagers made under
> >> license. London tap water had been through an average of seven kidneys before
> >> Londoners get top drink it.
>
> >> Australia could distil drinking water from seawater, if they weren't so silly
> >> about using nuclear power.
> >> --
>
> >> Martin........d'oh
>
> >Environmental Effects Of Uranium Mining In Australia
>
> > By Michael Krockenberger
> > ACF Campaigns ManagerWho?
>
> Never had problems like this European mines.
> --
>
> Martin

therefore they dont exist ???