I am leaving this NG.
May 20th 2002, 3:20 pm
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am leaving this NG.
Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer It
is about better men than me.
Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer It
is about better men than me.
May 20th 2002, 6:28 pm
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about bombing
in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that travel-related
information from you will be welcomed by all.
Best,
Michael
To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages
only, please!
>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about bombing
in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that travel-related
information from you will be welcomed by all.
Best,
Michael
To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages
only, please!
May 20th 2002, 9:33 pm
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
[email protected] (Pan) wrote:
>On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>
>>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>
>You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>
He's free to go.
PB
>On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>
>>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>
>You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>
He's free to go.
PB
May 21st 2002, 4:21 am
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Don't slam the door as you leave!
ArtKramr wrote:
>
> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>
> Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer It
> is about better men than me.
ArtKramr wrote:
>
> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>
> Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer It
> is about better men than me.
May 21st 2002, 10:21 am
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
On Tue, 21 May 2002 15:34:37 GMT, "Evelyn Vogt Gamble (Divamanque)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Don't slam the door as you leave! OR Kick the cat! ArtKramr wrote:
>>
>> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>> Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
>> It is about better men than me.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Don't slam the door as you leave! OR Kick the cat! ArtKramr wrote:
>>
>> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>> Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
>> It is about better men than me.
May 21st 2002, 2:30 pm
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:52:35 GMT, Padraig Breathnach <[email protected]> wrote:
>[email protected] (Pan) wrote:
>
>>On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>>
>>>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>>You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>>bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>>travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>>
>He's free to go.
As I said, it's up to him what he should do.
Michael
To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages
only, please!
>[email protected] (Pan) wrote:
>
>>On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>>
>>>Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>>You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>>bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>>travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>>
>He's free to go.
As I said, it's up to him what he should do.
Michael
To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages
only, please!
May 21st 2002, 3:22 pm
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> [email protected] (Pan) wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>>
>>> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>> You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>> bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>> travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>>
> He's free to go.
>
> PB
Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
you on it.
> [email protected] (Pan) wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2002 02:36:11 GMT, [email protected] (ArtKramr) wrote:
>>
>>> Those who want to contact me can do it by e-mail.
>>
>> You've posted some travel-related information, in addition to the posts about
>> bombing in WW II and such-like. It's up to you what to do, but I think that
>> travel-related information from you will be welcomed by all.
>>
> He's free to go.
>
> PB
Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
you on it.
May 21st 2002, 5:21 pm
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Rick Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>> He's free to go.
>
> Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
> you on it.
Mister Breathnach, you are under arrest for the most grievous of crimes: an
apparently vague statement posted to a Usenet forum. I hope you will go quietly with
the police so that the community can begin its healing process. Though honestly, I
don't know how we can ever recover. Rick, I think we all owe you a debt of gratitude
for going above and beyond the call of normalcy to call attention to this before it
became too late.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini
photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/
> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>> He's free to go.
>
> Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
> you on it.
Mister Breathnach, you are under arrest for the most grievous of crimes: an
apparently vague statement posted to a Usenet forum. I hope you will go quietly with
the police so that the community can begin its healing process. Though honestly, I
don't know how we can ever recover. Rick, I think we all owe you a debt of gratitude
for going above and beyond the call of normalcy to call attention to this before it
became too late.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini
photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/
May 21st 2002, 7:22 pm
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Miguel Cruz wrote:
> Rick Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>>> He's free to go.
>>
>> Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
>> you on it.
>
> Mister Breathnach, you are under arrest for the most grievous of crimes: an
> apparently vague statement posted to a Usenet forum. I hope you will go quietly
> with the police so that the community can begin its healing process. Though
> honestly, I don't know how we can ever recover. Rick, I think we all owe you a debt
> of gratitude for going above and beyond the call of normalcy to call attention to
> this before it became too late.
>
> miguel
Phew! Looks you got there just in time. Wouldn't want the RTE Borg to have to operate
independently of each other. Close call. It's... It's... so... so... ironic, don't
you think?
> Rick Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Padraig Breathnach wrote:
>>> He's free to go.
>>
>> Nice non-commital, factual statement PB and plenty of wiggle room if someone calls
>> you on it.
>
> Mister Breathnach, you are under arrest for the most grievous of crimes: an
> apparently vague statement posted to a Usenet forum. I hope you will go quietly
> with the police so that the community can begin its healing process. Though
> honestly, I don't know how we can ever recover. Rick, I think we all owe you a debt
> of gratitude for going above and beyond the call of normalcy to call attention to
> this before it became too late.
>
> miguel
Phew! Looks you got there just in time. Wouldn't want the RTE Borg to have to operate
independently of each other. Close call. It's... It's... so... so... ironic, don't
you think?
May 21st 2002, 10:21 pm
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Rick Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Phew! Looks you got there just in time. Wouldn't want the RTE Borg to have to
> operate independently of each other. Close call. It's... It's... so... so...
> ironic, don't you think?
1. People go happily about their lives, chatting from time to time in this forum. Few
of us know each other in any serious way (I think all of the people I know
personally are almost 100% lurkers), but we're used to each other's manner and
style. We poke and jibe, but basically have learned to get along.
2. New people show up all the time and participate happily. Some get bored (or get
the info they need) and leave; others stay.
3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against various
people that have been contributing here for some time.
4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
disruptive.
I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're hoping for.
Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let it.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini
photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/
> Phew! Looks you got there just in time. Wouldn't want the RTE Borg to have to
> operate independently of each other. Close call. It's... It's... so... so...
> ironic, don't you think?
1. People go happily about their lives, chatting from time to time in this forum. Few
of us know each other in any serious way (I think all of the people I know
personally are almost 100% lurkers), but we're used to each other's manner and
style. We poke and jibe, but basically have learned to get along.
2. New people show up all the time and participate happily. Some get bored (or get
the info they need) and leave; others stay.
3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against various
people that have been contributing here for some time.
4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
disruptive.
I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're hoping for.
Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let it.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini
photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/
May 22nd 2002, 3:25 am
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Miguel Cruz wrote:
> 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against various
> people that have been contributing here for some time.
Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
> 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
> disruptive.
Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously, like a
herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
> I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
> hoping for.
Hoping for? Sheeesh!
> Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
> it.
Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
wrong, result.
> 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against various
> people that have been contributing here for some time.
Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
> 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
> disruptive.
Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously, like a
herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
> I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
> hoping for.
Hoping for? Sheeesh!
> Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
> it.
Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
wrong, result.
May 22nd 2002, 3:25 am
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was just
an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
Rick Jacobs wrote:
>
> Miguel Cruz wrote:
>
> > 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against
> > various people that have been contributing here for some time.
>
> Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
> his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
> hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
> reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
> overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
>
> > 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
> > disruptive.
>
> Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously, like
> a herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
>
> > I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
> > hoping for.
>
> Hoping for? Sheeesh!
>
> > Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
> > it.
>
> Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
> wrong, result.
an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
Rick Jacobs wrote:
>
> Miguel Cruz wrote:
>
> > 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against
> > various people that have been contributing here for some time.
>
> Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
> his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
> hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
> reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
> overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
>
> > 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
> > disruptive.
>
> Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously, like
> a herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
>
> > I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
> > hoping for.
>
> Hoping for? Sheeesh!
>
> > Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
> > it.
>
> Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
> wrong, result.
May 22nd 2002, 3:25 am
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
David Gascon <[email protected]> wrote:
>What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
>just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
>
Seriously unrequited. I'm not speaking to him any more, no matter how hard he
clamours for my attention.
PB
>What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
>just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
>
Seriously unrequited. I'm not speaking to him any more, no matter how hard he
clamours for my attention.
PB
May 22nd 2002, 3:25 am
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
David Gascon wrote:
> What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
> just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
As if on cue, another of the Borg chimed in defensively, making their
antogonists point.
Barbara, where are you? We await your pontifications on this very serious matter.
I bet you Borg members email each other about this crap, don't you? Get a life.
> Rick Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> Miguel Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against
>>> various people that have been contributing here for some time.
>>
>> Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
>> his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
>> hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
>> reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
>> overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
>>
>>> 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
>>> disruptive.
>>
>> Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously,
>> like a herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
>>
>>> I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
>>> hoping for.
>>
>> Hoping for? Sheeesh!
>>
>>> Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
>>> it.
>>
>> Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
>> wrong, result.
> What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
> just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
As if on cue, another of the Borg chimed in defensively, making their
antogonists point.
Barbara, where are you? We await your pontifications on this very serious matter.
I bet you Borg members email each other about this crap, don't you? Get a life.
> Rick Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> Miguel Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Someone else shows up and starts launching weird, bitter attacks against
>>> various people that have been contributing here for some time.
>>
>> Weird, bitter attacks? Please... if one of your collective is questioned for first
>> his double standard and second for his method of debate about the same, one can
>> hardly define that as a "weird, bitter attack," at least to the normal objective
>> reader. However, your collective one-for-all-and-all-for-one mindeset seems to
>> overide common sense, throwing objectivity out the window.
>>
>>> 4. Other regulars take issue with this behavior because it's unpleasant and
>>> disruptive.
>>
>> Another RTE Borg observation, you take yourselves just a little too seriously,
>> like a herd gone mad and all members think they are the alpha leader.
>>
>>> I don't think this has the makings of the hivemind conspiracy that you're
>>> hoping for.
>>
>> Hoping for? Sheeesh!
>>
>>> Occam's Razor will be your friend, if you only let
>>> it.
>>
>> Your postulations are a straight line that leads directly to a convenient, but
>> wrong, result.
May 22nd 2002, 4:21 am
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: I am leaving this NG.
Rick Jacobs wrote:
>
> David Gascon wrote:
>
> > What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
> > just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
>
> As if on cue, another of the Borg chimed in defensively, making their
> antogonists point.
>
> Barbara, where are you? We await your pontifications on this very serious matter.
>
> I bet you Borg members email each other about this crap, don't you? Get a life.
>
I bet this "member" ignores you & your obsession quite totally hereafter. 'Bye.
>
> David Gascon wrote:
>
> > What "collective"? Sheeesh, just what IS your problem? At first I thought it was
> > just an unrequited love for PB, but it apparently goes beyond that.
>
> As if on cue, another of the Borg chimed in defensively, making their
> antogonists point.
>
> Barbara, where are you? We await your pontifications on this very serious matter.
>
> I bet you Borg members email each other about this crap, don't you? Get a life.
>
I bet this "member" ignores you & your obsession quite totally hereafter. 'Bye.
