With Global Warming A Fact....
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
BULLSHIT Jacqueline, produce some reliable figures, instead of relying
on your womb
on your womb
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Zubenelgenubi wrote:
> The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
> consume 25% of the world's energy. if you don't like it Jacqueline,
> tough!
>
Also, one notes, with far less pollution per amount of goods
produced than places like China, India, or Brazil. This is
a big deal. We could produce substantially more with the same
energy use or the same amount with much less energy use if
we simply allowed as much pollution as those countries
do.
Lots of people on Usenet hate America because of our success.
Envy is a powerful force.
Doug McDonald
> The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
> consume 25% of the world's energy. if you don't like it Jacqueline,
> tough!
>
Also, one notes, with far less pollution per amount of goods
produced than places like China, India, or Brazil. This is
a big deal. We could produce substantially more with the same
energy use or the same amount with much less energy use if
we simply allowed as much pollution as those countries
do.
Lots of people on Usenet hate America because of our success.
Envy is a powerful force.
Doug McDonald
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim Ley) wrote:
>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>
>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>
>Jim.
There are some positive exceptions in the US!
>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>
>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>
>Jim.
There are some positive exceptions in the US!
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On 4/02/07 16:55, in article [email protected],
"Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
"Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:46:03 +0100, Earl Evleth <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 4/02/07 16:55, in article [email protected],
>"Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
>
>
>Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
Only their 'power plants' are 'smelly'!!!!!
wrote:
>On 4/02/07 16:55, in article [email protected],
>"Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
>
>
>Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
Only their 'power plants' are 'smelly'!!!!!
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Jim Ley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:39:47 +0100, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim Ley) wrote:
> >
> >>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
> >><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
> >>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
> >>
> >>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
> >>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
> >
> >The sun always shines in California.
>
> So lots of AirCon needed you'd've thought?
Quite a lot of CA doesn't need aircon actually.
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:39:47 +0100, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim Ley) wrote:
> >
> >>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
> >><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
> >>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
> >>
> >>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
> >>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
> >
> >The sun always shines in California.
>
> So lots of AirCon needed you'd've thought?
Quite a lot of CA doesn't need aircon actually.
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
(don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:58:26 +0000, [email protected] (David Horne, _the_
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Jim Ley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:39:47 +0100, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim Ley) wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
>> >><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>> >>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>> >>
>> >>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>> >>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>> >
>> >The sun always shines in California.
>>
>> So lots of AirCon needed you'd've thought?
>
>Quite a lot of CA doesn't need aircon actually.
True, but it doesn't stop them using it :-)
AFAIK lowering a room temperature 10 DegC uses less energy than raising it 30
DegC. Mixi knows these things, because he done lots of research on global
warming in small enclosed spaces.
--
Martin
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>Jim Ley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:39:47 +0100, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim Ley) wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
>> >><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>> >>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>> >>
>> >>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>> >>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>> >
>> >The sun always shines in California.
>>
>> So lots of AirCon needed you'd've thought?
>
>Quite a lot of CA doesn't need aircon actually.
True, but it doesn't stop them using it :-)
AFAIK lowering a room temperature 10 DegC uses less energy than raising it 30
DegC. Mixi knows these things, because he done lots of research on global
warming in small enclosed spaces.
--
Martin
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:17:13 +0100, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>AFAIK lowering a room temperature 10 DegC uses less energy than raising it 30
>DegC. Mixi knows these things, because he done lots of research on global
>warming in small enclosed spaces.
Places (perhaps) where the sun doesn't shine?
Keith, Bristol, UK
>AFAIK lowering a room temperature 10 DegC uses less energy than raising it 30
>DegC. Mixi knows these things, because he done lots of research on global
>warming in small enclosed spaces.
Places (perhaps) where the sun doesn't shine?
Keith, Bristol, UK
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I stand by what I said. Soon all cities in the world will be car-free.
"Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Good for a start : you think !
>
> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de
> news: [email protected]. com...
>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>
>
>
"Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Good for a start : you think !
>
> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de
> news: [email protected]. com...
>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>
>
>
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
especially in the old town of Jerusalem !!
Why did you pick this city ?
"Joey Jolley" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
>I stand by what I said. Soon all cities in the world will be car-free.
> "Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Good for a start : you think !
>>
>> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message
>> de news: [email protected]. com...
>>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Why did you pick this city ?
"Joey Jolley" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
>I stand by what I said. Soon all cities in the world will be car-free.
> "Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Good for a start : you think !
>>
>> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message
>> de news: [email protected]. com...
>>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Shut up.
"Earl Evleth" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
C1EBCC5B.CFAA6%[email protected]...
> On 4/02/07 16:55, in article [email protected],
> "Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
>
>
> Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
>
"Earl Evleth" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
C1EBCC5B.CFAA6%[email protected]...
> On 4/02/07 16:55, in article [email protected],
> "Jacqueline" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are some positive exceptions in the US!
>
>
> Even with the figures for California, Sweden is more energy efficient.
>
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Because they're building a light-rail system. It's true.
"Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> especially in the old town of Jerusalem !!
> Why did you pick this city ?
>
> "Joey Jolley" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>>I stand by what I said. Soon all cities in the world will be car-free.
>> "Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Good for a start : you think !
>>>
>>> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message
>>> de news: [email protected]. com...
>>>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>>>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
"Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> especially in the old town of Jerusalem !!
> Why did you pick this city ?
>
> "Joey Jolley" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>>I stand by what I said. Soon all cities in the world will be car-free.
>> "Runge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Good for a start : you think !
>>>
>>> "Beavis and Butt-Head" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message
>>> de news: [email protected]. com...
>>>> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
>>>> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"The US takes 25% of the pullution in the world! And they refuse to
sign the Kyoto Protocol!!!!!!!!!!!" Jacqueline your statement makes no
sense. Don't you have some pills to tone down your hormones? Either
that or cut down on the gin.(snicker)
sign the Kyoto Protocol!!!!!!!!!!!" Jacqueline your statement makes no
sense. Don't you have some pills to tone down your hormones? Either
that or cut down on the gin.(snicker)
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On 2007-02-03 09:39:04 -0500, "Beavis and Butt-Head"
<[email protected]> said:
> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
As opposed to what? Jerusalem, North Dakota?
<[email protected]> said:
> I think auto travel will end in all cities around the world,
> especially in Europe and in Jerusalem, Israel.
As opposed to what? Jerusalem, North Dakota?
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:39 GMT, [email protected] (Jim
Ley) wrote:
>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>
>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>
>Jim.
Um, er, brownouts?
Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Epidaurus
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
Ley) wrote:
>On 3 Feb 2007 14:55:42 -0800, "Zubenelgenubi"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The US produces 25% of the world's goods and services thats why we
>>consume 25% of the world's energy.
>
>So how come California, one of the richest states, uses so much less
>electricity both per person and per unit of GDP?
>
>Jim.
Um, er, brownouts?
Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Epidaurus
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/