Digital photography, changing the world
Dec 12th 2004, 7:42 pm
#901
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:48:35 +0100, Jeremy Henderson wrote:
> On 2004-12-12 17:44:30 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]> said:
>
>> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>
>>> See above.
>>
>> Why should I take anything you say at face value, if you do not do the
>> same for anything I say?
>
> That's a good question. Why don't you meditate on it for a while.
>
> J;
Maybe, if he meditates enough, he'll end up like the bomb in Dark Star.
There's always hope.
--
Tim C.
> On 2004-12-12 17:44:30 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]> said:
>
>> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>
>>> See above.
>>
>> Why should I take anything you say at face value, if you do not do the
>> same for anything I say?
>
> That's a good question. Why don't you meditate on it for a while.
>
> J;
Maybe, if he meditates enough, he'll end up like the bomb in Dark Star.
There's always hope.
--
Tim C.
Dec 12th 2004, 7:43 pm
#902
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:18:30 -0600, Miguel Cruz wrote:
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [email protected] writes:
>>> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>>> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>> I have no proof of that.
>
> Magda, you better finish off that film.
>
> miguel
No good, he'll only think it's a photoshop'ed fake. Or at least have no
proof that it isn't.
--
Tim C.
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [email protected] writes:
>>> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>>> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>> I have no proof of that.
>
> Magda, you better finish off that film.
>
> miguel
No good, he'll only think it's a photoshop'ed fake. Or at least have no
proof that it isn't.
--
Tim C.
Dec 12th 2004, 7:44 pm
#903
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:20:45 GMT, devil wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:40:30 +0100, Magda wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:38:04 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
>> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:43:38 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>> ...
>> ... > [email protected] writes:
>> ... >
>> ... >> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>> ... >> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>> ... >
>> ... > I have no proof of that.
>> ...
>> ... Entirely your fault.
>>
>> Maybe he does not know how to take the metro... ;)
>
> Naaa.. I suspect he is just scared of Magda.
:-) I am.
--
Tim C.
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:40:30 +0100, Magda wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:38:04 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
>> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:43:38 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>> ...
>> ... > [email protected] writes:
>> ... >
>> ... >> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>> ... >> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>> ... >
>> ... > I have no proof of that.
>> ...
>> ... Entirely your fault.
>>
>> Maybe he does not know how to take the metro... ;)
>
> Naaa.. I suspect he is just scared of Magda.
:-) I am.
--
Tim C.
Dec 12th 2004, 7:49 pm
#904
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:25:28 +0000, chancellor of the duchy of besses o'
th' barn wrote:
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> By now you should know that I'm indifferent
>> to personal attacks.
>
> The only thing that I know for certain is that it's highly possible in
> any thread here that you'll eventually resort to claiming you've being
> attacked. You've got a history of it, though I note you seem to have
> learned what 'ad hominem' means, so you don't throw that around as
> gratuitously as you used to. I can think of ways of describing this
> penchant of yours- indifference is certainly not one of them.
At least he doesn't claim we're all Nazis.
--
Tim C.
th' barn wrote:
> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> By now you should know that I'm indifferent
>> to personal attacks.
>
> The only thing that I know for certain is that it's highly possible in
> any thread here that you'll eventually resort to claiming you've being
> attacked. You've got a history of it, though I note you seem to have
> learned what 'ad hominem' means, so you don't throw that around as
> gratuitously as you used to. I can think of ways of describing this
> penchant of yours- indifference is certainly not one of them.
At least he doesn't claim we're all Nazis.
--
Tim C.
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#905
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
>> I worry you may be getting too emotionally tied up in this discussion.
>I don't become emotional over USENET discussions.
No need to "shout"
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>> I worry you may be getting too emotionally tied up in this discussion.
>I don't become emotional over USENET discussions.
No need to "shout"
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#906
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
> I try my best to explain but some things are
>very difficult to explain, it seems.
you do not, it is very clear you avoid explanations and bring in
as much bullshit and red herrings as possible when challenged.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
> I try my best to explain but some things are
>very difficult to explain, it seems.
you do not, it is very clear you avoid explanations and bring in
as much bullshit and red herrings as possible when challenged.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#907
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
>> I invite you to choose the most likely explanation.
>It's a combination of all three, I suspect.
99% the latter.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>> I invite you to choose the most likely explanation.
>It's a combination of all three, I suspect.
99% the latter.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#908
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to [email protected]
>>But the thread does prove one thing, Mixi is a troll, but we knew
>>that. The question is, is the current version entertaining?
>He is not a troll, he is just Mixi.
He is probably both. I cant believe he's not so stupid as to not
understand he is not communicating well, although I have made a
last attempt to explain, just in case.
He is after all, quite competent at using scientific verbiage as
bullshit.
Mixi must surely just enjoy getting people to argue along on the
silliest of points? Which is trolling, in my book.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>>But the thread does prove one thing, Mixi is a troll, but we knew
>>that. The question is, is the current version entertaining?
>He is not a troll, he is just Mixi.
He is probably both. I cant believe he's not so stupid as to not
understand he is not communicating well, although I have made a
last attempt to explain, just in case.
He is after all, quite competent at using scientific verbiage as
bullshit.
Mixi must surely just enjoy getting people to argue along on the
silliest of points? Which is trolling, in my book.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#909
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to [email protected]
>I don't think Mixi's motive is to troll, maybe it looks like it to
>those who disagree with him.
Can you give a credible alternative explanation for his posting
style?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>I don't think Mixi's motive is to troll, maybe it looks like it to
>those who disagree with him.
Can you give a credible alternative explanation for his posting
style?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#910
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to [email protected]
>Don't be unfair. About 50% of the time I agree with him.
how long did it take to find out what he was saying here?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>Don't be unfair. About 50% of the time I agree with him.
how long did it take to find out what he was saying here?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 7:53 pm
#911
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
>Why should anyone
>> take you seriously, or at all?
>Because what I've said is actually true.
Its not enough for something to be true, the truth has to be
expressed in an honest way without endless smokescreens.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>Why should anyone
>> take you seriously, or at all?
>Because what I've said is actually true.
Its not enough for something to be true, the truth has to be
expressed in an honest way without endless smokescreens.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
Dec 12th 2004, 8:12 pm
#912
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:53:35 +0000, The Reids wrote:
> Following up to [email protected]
>
>>I don't think Mixi's motive is to troll, maybe it looks like it to
>>those who disagree with him.
>
> Can you give a credible alternative explanation for his posting
> style?
I'm certain he's not trolling. I did a long time ago. I think he's just in
need of company. He can't do much entertaining in his own place, and can't
afford to eat out even on his French CEO's income.
--
im C.
> Following up to [email protected]
>
>>I don't think Mixi's motive is to troll, maybe it looks like it to
>>those who disagree with him.
>
> Can you give a credible alternative explanation for his posting
> style?
I'm certain he's not trolling. I did a long time ago. I think he's just in
need of company. He can't do much entertaining in his own place, and can't
afford to eat out even on his French CEO's income.
--
im C.
Dec 12th 2004, 8:17 pm
#913
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
The Reids <[email protected]> wrote:
>Following up to Mxsmanic
>>> This is just another of your stupid pointless arguments.
>>And this is presumably another of your personal attacks. What do you
>>hope to accomplish with it? By now you should know that I'm indifferent
>>to personal attacks.
>What do you expect to achieve with your pointless arguments?
He's achieving it.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
>Following up to Mxsmanic
>>> This is just another of your stupid pointless arguments.
>>And this is presumably another of your personal attacks. What do you
>>hope to accomplish with it? By now you should know that I'm indifferent
>>to personal attacks.
>What do you expect to achieve with your pointless arguments?
He's achieving it.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
Dec 12th 2004, 8:34 pm
#914
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:44:22 +0100, Tim Challenger
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:20:45 GMT, devil wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:40:30 +0100, Magda wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:38:04 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
>>> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>
>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:43:38 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>>> ...
>>> ... > [email protected] writes:
>>> ... >
>>> ... >> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>>> ... >> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>>> ... >
>>> ... > I have no proof of that.
>>> ...
>>> ... Entirely your fault.
>>>
>>> Maybe he does not know how to take the metro... ;)
>>
>> Naaa.. I suspect he is just scared of Magda.
>:-) I am.
me too :-)
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:20:45 GMT, devil wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:40:30 +0100, Magda wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:38:04 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
>>> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>
>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:43:38 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>>> ...
>>> ... > [email protected] writes:
>>> ... >
>>> ... >> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>>> ... >> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>>> ... >
>>> ... > I have no proof of that.
>>> ...
>>> ... Entirely your fault.
>>>
>>> Maybe he does not know how to take the metro... ;)
>>
>> Naaa.. I suspect he is just scared of Magda.
>:-) I am.
me too :-)
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 8:34 pm
#915
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 03:20:12 GMT, devil <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:54:42 +0100, nitram wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:44:30 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>>> See above.
>>>Why should I take anything you say at face value, if you do not do the
>>>same for anything I say?
>>
>> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>Where were you BTW?
Pulling strings.
--
Martin
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:54:42 +0100, nitram wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:44:30 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>>> See above.
>>>Why should I take anything you say at face value, if you do not do the
>>>same for anything I say?
>>
>> because Jeremy either has witnesses or is running a large number of
>> sock puppets that all went out for a meal together last weekend.
>Where were you BTW?
Pulling strings.
--
Martin
