Digital photography, changing the world
Dec 12th 2004, 2:42 pm
#826
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:38:31 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:
>[email protected] writes:
>> WTF has Keith's post got to do with your implication that we all share
>> Keith's computer?
>He said "we have" and not "I have."
That has nothing to do with sharing Keith's computer.
This is just another of your stupid pointless arguments.
--
Martin
wrote:
>[email protected] writes:
>> WTF has Keith's post got to do with your implication that we all share
>> Keith's computer?
>He said "we have" and not "I have."
That has nothing to do with sharing Keith's computer.
This is just another of your stupid pointless arguments.
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:42 pm
#827
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On 2004-12-12 16:22:29 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]> said:
> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>> Perhaps. Since you haven't tried, we have only your word for the fact
>> that this mysterious concept is more difficult to understand than all
>> the myriad areas of expertise of your readers, and that you alone are
>> capable of comprehending it.
>
> Yes. But I'm not alone in being capable of comprehending it. Quite a
> few people can. But they are still a minority--and not a very vocal one
> at that.
>
>> Or maybe there's another explanation.
>
> There could be, but I believe this explanation is the correct one, after
> dealing with this for many years.
You may be right, and you are a member of a small intellectual elite.
Perhaps you are part of an advance party of super intelligent
extraterrestrials sent to prepare for an invasion from outer space.
That would explain your ability to grasp impossibly difficult concepts,
and your inability to communicate with mere Earthlings.
If only you slept in a Tardis and not a broom cupboard I'd incline
towards that theory. As it is ...
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>> Perhaps. Since you haven't tried, we have only your word for the fact
>> that this mysterious concept is more difficult to understand than all
>> the myriad areas of expertise of your readers, and that you alone are
>> capable of comprehending it.
>
> Yes. But I'm not alone in being capable of comprehending it. Quite a
> few people can. But they are still a minority--and not a very vocal one
> at that.
>
>> Or maybe there's another explanation.
>
> There could be, but I believe this explanation is the correct one, after
> dealing with this for many years.
You may be right, and you are a member of a small intellectual elite.
Perhaps you are part of an advance party of super intelligent
extraterrestrials sent to prepare for an invasion from outer space.
That would explain your ability to grasp impossibly difficult concepts,
and your inability to communicate with mere Earthlings.
If only you slept in a Tardis and not a broom cupboard I'd incline
towards that theory. As it is ...
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
Dec 12th 2004, 2:44 pm
#828
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>>>> [email protected] arranged some
>>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>>
>>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>>>> ... wrote:
>>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>> ... >
>>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>>> ... >> wrote:
>>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
>>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
>>>> sharing a PC.
>>>> ... >
>>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>>>>
>>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>>>
>>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>>
>> Can't be - I have a hob.
>
> for hob knobbing with?
Magda, of course.
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>>>> [email protected] arranged some
>>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>>
>>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>>>> ... wrote:
>>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>> ... >
>>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>>> ... >> wrote:
>>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
>>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
>>>> sharing a PC.
>>>> ... >
>>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>>>>
>>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>>>
>>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>>
>> Can't be - I have a hob.
>
> for hob knobbing with?
Magda, of course.
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
Dec 12th 2004, 2:45 pm
#829
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>>>>> [email protected] arranged some
>>>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>>>
>>>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>>>>> ... wrote:
>>>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>>> ... >
>>>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>>>> ... >> wrote:
>>>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>>>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>>>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
>>>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>>>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
>>>>> sharing a PC.
>>>>> ... >
>>>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>>>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>>>>
>>>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>>>
>>> Can't be - I have a hob.
>>
>> for hob knobbing with?
>Magda, of course.
ah, your sole mate of course :-)
--
Martin
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>>>>> [email protected] arranged some
>>>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>>>>
>>>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>>>>> ... wrote:
>>>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>>>>> ... >
>>>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>>>> ... >> wrote:
>>>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>>>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>>>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
>>>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>>>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
>>>>> sharing a PC.
>>>>> ... >
>>>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>>>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>>>>
>>>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>>>
>>> Can't be - I have a hob.
>>
>> for hob knobbing with?
>Magda, of course.
ah, your sole mate of course :-)
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:45 pm
#830
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
...
... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > wrote:
... >
... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>
... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
... >>>
... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... >>>>
... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... >>>> ... wrote:
... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>>> ... >
... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... >>>> ... >> wrote:
... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... >>>> sharing a PC.
... >>>> ... >
... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... >>>>
... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... >>>
... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... >>
... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
... >
... > for hob knobbing with?
...
... Magda, of course.
Why "of course" ??
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
...
... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > wrote:
... >
... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>
... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
... >>>
... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... >>>>
... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... >>>> ... wrote:
... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>>> ... >
... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... >>>> ... >> wrote:
... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... >>>> sharing a PC.
... >>>> ... >
... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... >>>>
... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... >>>
... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... >>
... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
... >
... > for hob knobbing with?
...
... Magda, of course.
Why "of course" ??
Dec 12th 2004, 2:47 pm
#831
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:42:37 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:22:29 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]> said:
>> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>> Perhaps. Since you haven't tried, we have only your word for the fact
>>> that this mysterious concept is more difficult to understand than all
>>> the myriad areas of expertise of your readers, and that you alone are
>>> capable of comprehending it.
>>
>> Yes. But I'm not alone in being capable of comprehending it. Quite a
>> few people can. But they are still a minority--and not a very vocal one
>> at that.
>>
>>> Or maybe there's another explanation.
>>
>> There could be, but I believe this explanation is the correct one, after
>> dealing with this for many years.
>You may be right, and you are a member of a small intellectual elite.
>Perhaps you are part of an advance party of super intelligent
>extraterrestrials sent to prepare for an invasion from outer space.
>That would explain your ability to grasp impossibly difficult concepts,
>and your inability to communicate with mere Earthlings.
>If only you slept in a Tardis and not a broom cupboard I'd incline
>towards that theory. As it is ...
:-)
Does having a relationship with a French petrol pump count?
--
Martin
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:22:29 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]> said:
>> Jeremy Henderson writes:
>>> Perhaps. Since you haven't tried, we have only your word for the fact
>>> that this mysterious concept is more difficult to understand than all
>>> the myriad areas of expertise of your readers, and that you alone are
>>> capable of comprehending it.
>>
>> Yes. But I'm not alone in being capable of comprehending it. Quite a
>> few people can. But they are still a minority--and not a very vocal one
>> at that.
>>
>>> Or maybe there's another explanation.
>>
>> There could be, but I believe this explanation is the correct one, after
>> dealing with this for many years.
>You may be right, and you are a member of a small intellectual elite.
>Perhaps you are part of an advance party of super intelligent
>extraterrestrials sent to prepare for an invasion from outer space.
>That would explain your ability to grasp impossibly difficult concepts,
>and your inability to communicate with mere Earthlings.
>If only you slept in a Tardis and not a broom cupboard I'd incline
>towards that theory. As it is ...
:-)
Does having a relationship with a French petrol pump count?
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:47 pm
#832
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On 2004-12-12 16:45:49 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>
> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]>
> ... > wrote:
> ... > ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
> rec.travel.europe, ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy
> Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... wrote:
> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
> <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one
> user. If this were
> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
> whole of rte ... >>>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... > ... > for hob knobbing with?
> ... ... Magda, of course.
>
> Why "of course" ??
If you have to ask ...
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>
> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]>
> ... > wrote:
> ... > ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
> rec.travel.europe, ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy
> Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... wrote:
> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
> <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one
> user. If this were
> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
> whole of rte ... >>>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... > ... > for hob knobbing with?
> ... ... Magda, of course.
>
> Why "of course" ??
If you have to ask ...
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
Dec 12th 2004, 2:48 pm
#833
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:45:49 +0100, Magda
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ...
> ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... > wrote:
> ... >
> ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>
> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>>
> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>>
> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... wrote:
> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
> ... >>>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>>
> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>>
> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >>
> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... >
> ... > for hob knobbing with?
> ...
> ... Magda, of course.
>Why "of course" ??
LOL and you swore him to silence too :-)
Never trust a man with holes in his soles!
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ...
> ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... > wrote:
> ... >
> ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>
> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>>
> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>>
> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... wrote:
> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
> ... >>>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>>> ... >
> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>>
> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>>
> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >>
> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... >
> ... > for hob knobbing with?
> ...
> ... Magda, of course.
>Why "of course" ??
LOL and you swore him to silence too :-)
Never trust a man with holes in his soles!
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:49 pm
#834
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... wrote:
...
... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >
... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
... >>
... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... >>> [email protected] arranged some
... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... >>>
... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... >>> ... wrote:
... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>> ... >
... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... >>> ... >> wrote:
... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... >>> sharing a PC.
... >>> ... >
... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... >>>
... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... >>
... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... >
... >Can't be - I have a hob.
...
... for hob knobbing with?
Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... wrote:
...
... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >
... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
... >>
... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... >>> [email protected] arranged some
... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... >>>
... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... >>> ... wrote:
... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... >>> ... >
... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... >>> ... >> wrote:
... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... >>> sharing a PC.
... >>> ... >
... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... >>>
... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... >>
... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... >
... >Can't be - I have a hob.
...
... for hob knobbing with?
Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
Dec 12th 2004, 2:49 pm
#835
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:47:48 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:45:49 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > wrote:
>> ... > ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... >> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... >>> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
>> rec.travel.europe, ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... >>>> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy
>> Henderson <[email protected]>
>> ... >>>> ... wrote:
>> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... >>>> ... >
>> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
>> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one
>> user. If this were
>> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
>> whole of rte ... >>>> sharing a PC.
>> ... >>>> ... >
>> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>> ... >>>> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>> ... >>> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>> ... >> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
>> ... > ... > for hob knobbing with?
>> ... ... Magda, of course.
>>
>> Why "of course" ??
>If you have to ask ...
I could hear the noise of the virtual boxed ear from here.
--
Martin
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:45:49 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:44:43 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On 2004-12-12 16:40:07 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... ... > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > wrote:
>> ... > ... >> On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... >> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>> ... >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... >>> ... >>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
>> rec.travel.europe, ... >>>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... >>>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... >>>> ... >>>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy
>> Henderson <[email protected]>
>> ... >>>> ... wrote:
>> ... >>>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... >>>> ... >
>> ... >>>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... >>>> ... >> wrote:
>> ... >>>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>> ... >>>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one
>> user. If this were
>> ... >>>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>> ... >>>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
>> whole of rte ... >>>> sharing a PC.
>> ... >>>> ... >
>> ... >>>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
>> ... >>>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>> ... >>>> ... >>>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>> ... >>> ... >>> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>> ... >> ... >> Can't be - I have a hob.
>> ... > ... > for hob knobbing with?
>> ... ... Magda, of course.
>>
>> Why "of course" ??
>If you have to ask ...
I could hear the noise of the virtual boxed ear from here.
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:51 pm
#836
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
>electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... wrote:
> ...
> ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >
> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>
> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>
> ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>> ... wrote:
> ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>> ... >
> ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> ... >>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
> ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
> ... >>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>> ... >
> ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>
> ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>
> ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >
> ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
> ...
> ... for hob knobbing with?
>Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
>electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... wrote:
> ...
> ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >
> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... >>
> ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>>
> ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... >>> ... wrote:
> ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... >>> ... >
> ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> ... >>> ... >> wrote:
> ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
> ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
> ... >>> sharing a PC.
> ... >>> ... >
> ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
> ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... >>>
> ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... >>
> ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... >
> ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
> ...
> ... for hob knobbing with?
>Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:52 pm
#837
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:05 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
... <[email protected]> wrote:
...
... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
... >electrons, so they looked like this :
... >
... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > ... wrote:
... > ...
... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... > ... >
... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
... > ... >>
... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... > ... >>>
... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > ... >>> ... wrote:
... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... > ... >>> ... >
... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
... > ... >>> ... >
... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... > ... >>>
... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... > ... >>
... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... > ... >
... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
... > ...
... > ... for hob knobbing with?
... >
... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
...
... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
... <[email protected]> wrote:
...
... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
... >electrons, so they looked like this :
... >
... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > ... wrote:
... > ...
... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
... > ... >
... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
... > ... >>
... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
... > ... >>>
... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
... > ... >>> ... wrote:
... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
... > ... >>> ... >
... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than one user. If this were
... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the whole of rte
... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
... > ... >>> ... >
... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my kitchen?
... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
... > ... >>>
... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
... > ... >>
... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
... > ... >
... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
... > ...
... > ... for hob knobbing with?
... >
... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
...
... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
Dec 12th 2004, 2:54 pm
#838
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On 2004-12-12 16:52:56 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:05 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> [email protected] arranged some
> electrons, so they looked like this :
>
> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
> ... <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... ... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >
> ... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]>
> ... > ... wrote:
> ... > ... ... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > ... >> ... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
> rec.travel.europe, ... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100,
> Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... > ... >>> ... wrote:
> ... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... > ... >>> ... >
> ... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
> <[email protected]>
> ... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than
> one user. If this were
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
> whole of rte ... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
> ... > ... >>> ... >
> ... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my
> kitchen?
> ... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... > ... >> ... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... > ... ... > ... for hob knobbing with?
> ... >
> ... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
> ... ... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
>
> Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
And assorted French CEO's.
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:05 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> [email protected] arranged some
> electrons, so they looked like this :
>
> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
> ... <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... ... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
> [email protected] arranged some
> ... >electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >
> ... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
> <[email protected]>
> ... > ... wrote:
> ... > ... ... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > ... >> ... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
> rec.travel.europe, ... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
> ... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100,
> Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
> ... > ... >>> ... wrote:
> ... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
> ... > ... >>> ... >
> ... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
> <[email protected]>
> ... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than
> one user. If this were
> ... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
> whole of rte ... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
> ... > ... >>> ... >
> ... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my
> kitchen?
> ... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
> ... > ... >> ... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
> ... > ... ... > ... for hob knobbing with?
> ... >
> ... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
> ... ... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
>
> Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
And assorted French CEO's.
J;
--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
Dec 12th 2004, 2:57 pm
#839
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:52:56 +0100, Magda
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
and runs on Keith's PC?
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
and runs on Keith's PC?
--
Martin
Dec 12th 2004, 2:58 pm
#840
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:54:00 +0100, Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:52:56 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:05 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>> [email protected] arranged some
>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
>> ... <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... ... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... >electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... >
>> ... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... wrote:
>> ... > ... ... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... > ... >
>> ... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... > ... >> ... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
>> rec.travel.europe, ... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100,
>> Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... >>> ... wrote:
>> ... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than
>> one user. If this were
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
>> whole of rte ... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >
>> ... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my
>> kitchen?
>> ... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>> ... > ... >> ... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>> ... > ... >
>> ... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
>> ... > ... ... > ... for hob knobbing with?
>> ... >
>> ... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
>> ... ... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
>>
>> Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
>And assorted French CEO's.
BTW what is a French CEO and is the pronunciation Italian?
--
Martin
wrote:
>On 2004-12-12 16:52:56 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> said:
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:05 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>> [email protected] arranged some
>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>>
>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:49:36 +0100, Magda
>> ... <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... ... >On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:40:07 +0100, in rec.travel.europe,
>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... >electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... >
>> ... > ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:35:52 +0100, Jeremy Henderson
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... wrote:
>> ... > ... ... > ... >On 2004-12-12 16:21:59 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... > ... >
>> ... > ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:20:53 +0100, Magda
>> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ... > ... >> ... > ... >>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:18:30 +0100, in
>> rec.travel.europe, ... > ... >>> [email protected] arranged some
>> ... > ... >>> electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> ... On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:18 +0100,
>> Jeremy Henderson <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... >>> ... wrote:
>> ... > ... >>> ... ... >On 2004-12-12 16:12:44 +0100, [email protected] said:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:10:03 +0100, Mxsmanic
>> <[email protected]>
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> wrote:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >>> [email protected] writes:
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>>> That is totally irrelevant.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> ... >>> "We" is plural, and implies more than
>> one user. If this were
>> ... > ... >>> ... >>> irrelevant, there'd be no reason to change pronouns.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >> ... >> "We" implies more than one person, not the
>> whole of rte ... > ... >>> sharing a PC.
>> ... > ... >>> ... >
>> ... > ... >>> ... >We don't? So who are all these strange people in my
>> kitchen?
>> ... > ... >>> ... ... Magda's gentlemen after her juicy marsh mallows? :-)
>> ... > ... >>> ... > ... >>> In Jeremy's kitchen ?!
>> ... > ... >> ... > ... >> Are you sharing Jeremy's kitchen with Mixi?
>> ... > ... >
>> ... > ... >Can't be - I have a hob.
>> ... > ... ... > ... for hob knobbing with?
>> ... >
>> ... >Do you mean hobnobbing or something else ?
>> ... ... I did, but the spelling checker decided that it knew best.
>>
>> Does your spell checker live in a shoe box with Mixi ?
>And assorted French CEO's.
BTW what is a French CEO and is the pronunciation Italian?
--
Martin