Go Back  British Expats > Usenet Groups > rec.travel.* > rec.travel.europe
Reload this Page >

Digital photography, changing the world

Wikiposts

Digital photography, changing the world

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 1st 2004, 8:41 pm
  #451  
nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 06:24:08 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >erilar writes:
    >> To be honest, this is one of the things that worries me about my digital
    >> camera.
    >If you back up your data, it will survive indefinitely. But if you take
    >no backups, you will lose all your photos when your disk drive fails
    >(and all disk drives eventually fail).

They do?

In 38 years of using disk drives I have only seen two fail, the others
all out lived the life of the computer. I have only ever had one PC
hard drive fail. It failed in the first two months.

    >> I keep foto albums, though, and the digital images I want to keep go into
    >> them.
    >Unfortunately, once you print the images, they lose the advantage of
    >digital and will eventually deteriorate.

--
Martin
 
Old Dec 1st 2004, 8:48 pm
  #452  
Tim Challenger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 06:24:08 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:

    > If you back up your data, it will survive indefinitely. But if you take
    > no backups, you will lose all your photos when your disk drive fails
    > (and all disk drives eventually fail).

Correction: ...and all disk drives eventually fail if left to run
indefinitely.

And houses burn down taking photo collections with them, in whatever form.

--
Tim C.
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 3:53 am
  #453  
Miguel Cruz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Tim Challenger <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:03:18 +0100, Kristian wrote:
    >> Nina Hagen
    > Udo Lindenberg, BAP, Die Fantastiche Vier,
    > Herbert Grönemeyer, Trio ("da da da") and
    > Rudolf "Rocky" Remmler ("Alles Hat Ein Ende nur die Wurst hat Zwei").
    > Not forgetting the pinnacle of German popular music acheivement: Modern
    > Talking and Boney-M.

Was Falco (RIP) German or Austrian?

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 4:04 am
  #454  
nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:53:03 -0600, [email protected] (Miguel Cruz)
wrote:

    >Tim Challenger <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:03:18 +0100, Kristian wrote:
    >>> Nina Hagen
    >> Udo Lindenberg, BAP, Die Fantastiche Vier,
    >> Herbert Grönemeyer, Trio ("da da da") and
    >> Rudolf "Rocky" Remmler ("Alles Hat Ein Ende nur die Wurst hat Zwei").
    >> Not forgetting the pinnacle of German popular music acheivement: Modern
    >> Talking and Boney-M.
    >Was Falco (RIP) German or Austrian?

google says Austrian.
--
Martin
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 4:29 am
  #455  
Frank F. Matthews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

erilar wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I predict that over the next few years vast numbers of people
    >>will loose all their "memory" photographs due to tech change +
    >>lack of back up.
    >
    >
    > To be honest, this is one of the things that worries me about my digital
    > camera. I have negatives going back half a century I can still make
    > prints from--or could if I still had access to a darkroom, anyway. I
    > keep foto albums, though, and the digital images I want to keep go into
    > them.
    >



I would expect that difficulties with finding darkrooms will be a
quicker killer for film images than any problems encountered with
digital tech change. I have also seen problems with color degradation
with older film images.
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 5:58 am
  #456  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to Mxsmanic

    >No, it's not. PS works with three numbers representing three specific
    >spots in the spectrum. Filters work with the entire visible spectrum.

You might as well say it works with 0s and 1s. I assume you are
aware you can describe any colour with a set of three RGB or RBY
components?

    >Shoot a black-and-white picture of a scene using a monochromatic yellow
    >filter. Then shoot a color picture of the same scene without a filter,
    >and try to convert it to grayscale in a way that matches the result
    >taken with the yellow filter. You'll find that it cannot be done.

You have demonstrated a difference between black and white and
colour photography which isnt what we are talking about. In any
case I expect you could darken the blues before your conversion
to greyscale to get the same result as yellow filtered black and
white.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 5:58 am
  #457  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to Mxsmanic

    >No, there are different types of pink cast. The cast that results from
    >use of a filter involves selectively altering the continuous spectrum of
    >light from the original scene. The cast that results from playing with
    >Photoshop simply involves boosting the red channel in an RGB subset of
    >the original scene.

that's not how I would add a colour filter, I would create a
layer of the filter colour I require over the whole image or as a
grad, then blend to the required degree. boosting red would do
just that, boost red.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 5:58 am
  #458  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to [email protected]

    > The cast that results from
    >>use of a filter involves selectively altering the continuous spectrum of
    >What does the word "continuous" add to the meaning?

What does "selectively"?

    >A filter, filters out that part of the spectrum that doesn't make it
    >through the filter, it must be possible to reproduce the same thing
    >with PS.

Of course, as Mixi knows?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:06 am
  #459  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to erilar

    > I
    >keep foto albums, though, and the digital images I want to keep go into
    >them.

I think prints with good inks are the safest way to save digital
images.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:06 am
  #460  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to [email protected]

    >Don't you back them up onto a CD/DVD too?

That's all very well but vulnerable to tech change and your
likely failure to re back up in old age.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:06 am
  #461  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to Mxsmanic

    >Unfortunately, once you print the images, they lose the advantage of
    >digital and will eventually deteriorate.

but not catastrophically, I have prints made by my grandfather,
dog-eared but viewable. CDs in 100 years? Unreadable due to tech
change and deterioration.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:06 am
  #462  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

Following up to [email protected]

    >They do?
    >In 38 years of using disk drives I have only seen two fail, the others
    >all out lived the life of the computer. I have only ever had one PC
    >hard drive fail. It failed in the first two months.

My last one failed.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:18 am
  #463  
Miguel Cruz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

The Reids <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Following up to Mxsmanic
    >> No, it's not. PS works with three numbers representing three specific
    >> spots in the spectrum. Filters work with the entire visible spectrum.
    > You might as well say it works with 0s and 1s. I assume you are
    > aware you can describe any colour with a set of three RGB or RBY
    > components?

That you cannot. The RGB gamut is not as comprehensive as, e.g., CIElab.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 6:20 am
  #464  
Miguel Cruz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

The Reids <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Following up to [email protected]
    >> They do?
    >> In 38 years of using disk drives I have only seen two fail, the others
    >> all out lived the life of the computer. I have only ever had one PC
    >> hard drive fail. It failed in the first two months.
    > My last one failed.

Just had two identical drives (with near-identical serial #s) fail within a
few days of each other, a week out of warranty.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
 
Old Dec 2nd 2004, 7:14 am
  #465  
Mxsmanic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Digital photography, changing the world

The Reids writes:

    > You might as well say it works with 0s and 1s.

No, that has nothing to do with what I'm saying.

    > I assume you are aware you can describe any colour with
    > a set of three RGB or RBY components?

You cannot describe any color that way. You can only describe
individually perceptible (to human beings) colors that way.

However, that also has nothing to do with what I was saying.

    > You have demonstrated a difference between black and white and
    > colour photography which isnt what we are talking about.

It's exactly what we are talking about.

    > In any
    > case I expect you could darken the blues before your conversion
    > to greyscale to get the same result as yellow filtered black and
    > white.

No, you can't. Try it.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
 


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.