Crazy Horse Paris to change name ?
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe wrote:
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>Frank F. Matthews writes:
>>>A decendent of an early immigrant.
> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>Like members of the DAR and almost all American blacks?
>>If descendants of later immigrants are not really Americans, what are
>>they?
> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
Long generations if 200 years gets you only five.
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>Frank F. Matthews writes:
>>>A decendent of an early immigrant.
> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>Like members of the DAR and almost all American blacks?
>>If descendants of later immigrants are not really Americans, what are
>>they?
> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
Long generations if 200 years gets you only five.
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:22:10 GMT, "Frank F. Matthews"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Miss L. Toe wrote:
>> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>Frank F. Matthews writes:
>>>>A decendent of an early immigrant.
>> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>>Like members of the DAR and almost all American blacks?
>>>If descendants of later immigrants are not really Americans, what are
>>>they?
>> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
>Long generations if 200 years gets you only five.
I can manage 140 years going back two generations, excluding myself.
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Miss L. Toe wrote:
>> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>Frank F. Matthews writes:
>>>>A decendent of an early immigrant.
>> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>>Like members of the DAR and almost all American blacks?
>>>If descendants of later immigrants are not really Americans, what are
>>>they?
>> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
>Long generations if 200 years gets you only five.
I can manage 140 years going back two generations, excluding myself.
--
Martin
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe writes:
> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
Who were the _first_ settlers?
> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
Who were the _first_ settlers?
> Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[email protected] writes:
> I can manage 140 years going back two generations, excluding myself.
Few people reproduce at age 70.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> I can manage 140 years going back two generations, excluding myself.
Few people reproduce at age 70.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe writes:
> Why do you think it can't be done ?
There's no legal basis for it.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Why do you think it can't be done ?
There's no legal basis for it.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
> Who were the _first_ settlers?
I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
call Red Indians.
> > Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
> How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
> Who were the _first_ settlers?
I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
call Red Indians.
> > Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
> How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > Why do you think it can't be done ?
> There's no legal basis for it.
They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
than asking nicely.
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > Why do you think it can't be done ?
> There's no legal basis for it.
They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
than asking nicely.
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe writes:
> I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
> call Red Indians.
What about the archeological evidence for earlier settlers?
> Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
It's an inaccurate term. Immigration is not inherited.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
> call Red Indians.
What about the archeological evidence for earlier settlers?
> Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
It's an inaccurate term. Immigration is not inherited.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe writes:
> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
> than asking nicely.
Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
> than asking nicely.
Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Miss L. Toe writes:
>> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
>> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
>> than asking nicely.
> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
Buying the place up, starting a public relations offensive or a botcott,
etc.
The latter two are pretty close to terrorist acts under emerging
interpretation of the Patriot Act, but not yet in France.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
> Miss L. Toe writes:
>> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
>> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
>> than asking nicely.
> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
Buying the place up, starting a public relations offensive or a botcott,
etc.
The latter two are pretty close to terrorist acts under emerging
interpretation of the Patriot Act, but not yet in France.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:08:24 -0500, [email protected] (Miguel Cruz)
wrote:
>Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Miss L. Toe writes:
>>> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
>>> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
>>> than asking nicely.
>> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
>Buying the place up, starting a public relations offensive or a botcott,
Ah, so that's where a robot sleeps.
---
DFM
wrote:
>Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Miss L. Toe writes:
>>> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
>>> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
>>> than asking nicely.
>> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
>Buying the place up, starting a public relations offensive or a botcott,
Ah, so that's where a robot sleeps.
---
DFM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe wrote:
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Miss L. Toe writes:
>>>I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>Who were the _first_ settlers?
> I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
> call Red Indians.
Somewhat questionable. There is some evidence that they were in a
second or third wave of immigration and the original immigrants moved on
south.
>>>Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
>>How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
>
>
> Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
>
>
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Miss L. Toe writes:
>>>I would say a decendent of the first settlers.
>>Who were the _first_ settlers?
> I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we know
> call Red Indians.
Somewhat questionable. There is some evidence that they were in a
second or third wave of immigration and the original immigrants moved on
south.
>>>Second or third generation immigrants (or maybe fourth or fifth etc).
>>How can they be immigrants if they were born in the United States?
>
>
> Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
>
>
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Miss L. Toe wrote:
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Miss L. Toe writes:
>>>Why do you think it can't be done ?
>>There's no legal basis for it.
>
> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
> than asking nicely.
The French police can cope.
> "Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Miss L. Toe writes:
>>>Why do you think it can't be done ?
>>There's no legal basis for it.
>
> They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact they
> said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot more
> than asking nicely.
The French police can cope.
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we
know
> > call Red Indians.
> What about the archeological evidence for earlier settlers?
Tell me about it.
> > Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> > expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> > immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
> It's an inaccurate term. Immigration is not inherited.
Life is an inaccurate term.
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > I'm not a historian, but from the little I know possibly the people we
know
> > call Red Indians.
> What about the archeological evidence for earlier settlers?
Tell me about it.
> > Hence the word 'generation'. "second generation immigrant' is a common
> > expression in the UK used to refer to the children (born in the UK) of
> > immigrants who have become more integrated into British society.
> It's an inaccurate term. Immigration is not inherited.
Life is an inaccurate term.
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Mxsmanic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact
they
> > said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot
more
> > than asking nicely.
> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
Because they vote republican ??
news:[email protected]...
> Miss L. Toe writes:
> > They didnt say that their tactics were limited to legal means, in fact
they
> > said "whatever it takes" which to many people might mean doing a lot
more
> > than asking nicely.
> Terrorism? Why haven't they been arrested?
Because they vote republican ??