Continental Airlines summonsed over Concorde crash
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Air wrote:
> The message <[email protected]>
> from "Keith W" <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
>
>
>>Horsefeathers. Titanium is widely used in aircraft construction, indeed
>>Comcorde used more than most as it was needed to resist the
>>friction heat along the leading edges of wings and stabiliser.
>
>
> AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
> titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
> fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>
> http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
> has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>
VERY interesting!! The report shows how badly Continental maintain their
aircraft. It makes you wonder just how safe their planes are.
T.
> The message <[email protected]>
> from "Keith W" <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
>
>
>>Horsefeathers. Titanium is widely used in aircraft construction, indeed
>>Comcorde used more than most as it was needed to resist the
>>friction heat along the leading edges of wings and stabiliser.
>
>
> AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
> titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
> fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>
> http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
> has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>
VERY interesting!! The report shows how badly Continental maintain their
aircraft. It makes you wonder just how safe their planes are.
T.
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Keith W wrote:
> "Air" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
> > titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
> > fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
> Titanium is more expensive than SS, not as readily available and is harder
> to work. It seems an unlikely material to choose for a 'bodge job'
> >
> > http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
> > has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
> >
> I didnt see anything in this to indicate the wrong materials were used and
> it stated that the spacing and size of the attachment holes were correct.
Errrr.........
" In the position of the missing part, the fitting still had several rivets in
place;
the fitting was drilled with thirty-seven holes, some of which had spaces
less than twice their diameter between them. "
From the above link.
Just look at the pics too. It's a mess.
Graham
> "Air" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
> > titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
> > fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
> Titanium is more expensive than SS, not as readily available and is harder
> to work. It seems an unlikely material to choose for a 'bodge job'
> >
> > http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
> > has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
> >
> I didnt see anything in this to indicate the wrong materials were used and
> it stated that the spacing and size of the attachment holes were correct.
Errrr.........
" In the position of the missing part, the fitting still had several rivets in
place;
the fitting was drilled with thirty-seven holes, some of which had spaces
less than twice their diameter between them. "
From the above link.
Just look at the pics too. It's a mess.
Graham
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Tom Peel <[email protected]>
sednews:[email protected]:
> Air wrote:
>> The message <[email protected]>
>> from "Keith W" <[email protected]> contains these words:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Horsefeathers. Titanium is widely used in aircraft construction, indeed
>>>Comcorde used more than most as it was needed to resist the
>>>friction heat along the leading edges of wings and stabiliser.
>>
>>
>> AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
>> titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
>> fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>>
>> http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
>> has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>>
> VERY interesting!! The report shows how badly Continental maintain their
> aircraft.
No it doesn't
sednews:[email protected]:
> Air wrote:
>> The message <[email protected]>
>> from "Keith W" <[email protected]> contains these words:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Horsefeathers. Titanium is widely used in aircraft construction, indeed
>>>Comcorde used more than most as it was needed to resist the
>>>friction heat along the leading edges of wings and stabiliser.
>>
>>
>> AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
>> titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not made or
>> fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>>
>> http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is old bit
>> has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>>
> VERY interesting!! The report shows how badly Continental maintain their
> aircraft.
No it doesn't
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Pooh Bear <[email protected]>
sednews:[email protected]:
> Keith W wrote:
>
>> "Air" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
>> > titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not
>> > made or fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>> Titanium is more expensive than SS, not as readily available and is
>> harder to work. It seems an unlikely material to choose for a 'bodge
>> job'
>> >
>> > http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is
>> > old bit has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>> >
>> I didnt see anything in this to indicate the wrong materials were
>> used and it stated that the spacing and size of the attachment holes
>> were correct.
>
> Errrr.........
>
> " In the position of the missing part, the fitting still had several
> rivets in place;
> the fitting was drilled with thirty-seven holes, some of which had
> spaces
> less than twice their diameter between them. "
>
> From the above link.
>
> Just look at the pics too. It's a mess.
>
Like you'd now, planespotting fjukwit.
Bertie
sednews:[email protected]:
> Keith W wrote:
>
>> "Air" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > AIUI the part which fell off, should not have been replaced with
>> > titanium, but should have been stainless steel. It was also not
>> > made or fitted correctly, and basically a 'bodge job'.
>> Titanium is more expensive than SS, not as readily available and is
>> harder to work. It seems an unlikely material to choose for a 'bodge
>> job'
>> >
>> > http://www.bea-fr.org/docs/f-sc00072...c000725ae.html is
>> > old bit has some interesting tit bits under section 16.6
>> >
>> I didnt see anything in this to indicate the wrong materials were
>> used and it stated that the spacing and size of the attachment holes
>> were correct.
>
> Errrr.........
>
> " In the position of the missing part, the fitting still had several
> rivets in place;
> the fitting was drilled with thirty-seven holes, some of which had
> spaces
> less than twice their diameter between them. "
>
> From the above link.
>
> Just look at the pics too. It's a mess.
>
Like you'd now, planespotting fjukwit.
Bertie




